Alessandro Maggi1, Hanqing Li2, Julia R Greer3. 1. Division of Engineering and Applied Science, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA. Electronic address: maggi@caltech.edu. 2. Division of Biology and Biological Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA. 3. Division of Engineering and Applied Science, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA.
Abstract
The precise mechanisms that lead to orthopedic implant failure are not well understood; it is believed that the micromechanical environment at the bone-implant interface regulates structural stability of an implant. In this work, we seek to understand how the 3D mechanical environment of an implant affects bone formation during early osteointegration. We employed two-photon lithography (TPL) direct laser writing to fabricate 3-dimensional rigid polymer scaffolds with tetrakaidecahedral periodic geometry, herewith referred to as nanolattices, whose strut dimensions were on the same order as osteoblasts' focal adhesions (∼2μm) and pore sizes on the order of cell size, ∼10μm. Some of these nanolattices were subsequently coated with thin conformal layers of Ti or W, and a final outer layer of 18nm-thick TiO2 was deposited on all samples to ensure biocompatibility. Nanomechanical experiments on each type of nanolattice revealed the range of stiffnesses of 0.7-100MPa. Osteoblast-like cells (SAOS-2) were seeded on each nanolattice, and their mechanosensitve response was explored by tracking mineral secretions and intracellular f-actin and vinculin concentrations after 2, 8 and 12days of cell culture in mineralization media. Experiments revealed that the most compliant nanolattices had ∼20% more intracellular f-actin and ∼40% more Ca and P secreted onto them than the stiffer nanolattices, where such cellular response was virtually indistinguishable. We constructed a simple phenomenological model that appears to capture the observed relation between scaffold stiffness and f-actin concentration. This model predicts a range of optimal scaffold stiffnesses for maximum f-actin concentration, which appears to be directly correlated with osteoblast-driven mineral deposition. This work suggests that three-dimensional scaffolds with titania-coated surfaces may provide an optimal microenvironment for cell growth when their stiffness is similar to that of cartilage (∼0.5-3MPa). These findings help provide a greater understanding of osteoblast mechanosensitivity and may have profound implications in developing more effective and safer bone prostheses. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE: Creating prostheses that lead to optimal bone remodeling has been a challenge for more than two decades because of a lack of thorough knowledge of cell behavior in three-dimensional (3D) environments. Literature has shown that 2D substrate stiffness plays a significant role in determining cell behavior, however, limitations in fabrication techniques and difficulties in characterizing cell-scaffold interactions have limited our understanding of how 3D scaffolds' stiffness affects cell response. The present study shows that scaffold structural stiffness affects osteoblasts cellular response. Specifically this work shows that the cells grown on the most compliant nanolattices with a stiffness of 0.7MPa expressed ∼20% higher concentration of intracellular f-actin and secreted ∼40% more Ca and P compared with all other nanolattices. This suggests that bone scaffolds with a stiffness close to that of cartilage may serve as optimal 3D scaffolds for new synthetic bone graft materials.
The precise mechanisms that lead to orthopedic implant failure are not well understood; it is believed that the micromechanical environment at the bone-implant interface regulates structural stability of an implant. In this work, we seek to understand how the 3D mechanical environment of an implant affects bone formapan class="Chemical">tion during early osteointegration. We employed two-photon lithography (TPL) direct laser writing to fabricate 3-dimensional rigid polymer scaffolds with tetrakaidecahedral periodic geometry, herewith referred to as nanolattices, whose strut dimensions were on the same order as osteoblasts' focal adhesions (∼2μm) and pore sizes on the order of cell size, ∼10μm. Some of these nanolattices were subsequently coated with thin conformal layers of Ti or W, and a final outer layer of 18nm-thick TiO2 was deposited on all samples to ensure biocompatibility. Nanomechanical experiments on each type of nanolattice revealed the range of stiffnesses of 0.7-100MPa. Osteoblast-like cells (SAOS-2) were seeded on each nanolattice, and their mechanosensitve response was explored by tracking mineral secretions and intracellular f-actin and vinculin concentrations after 2, 8 and 12days of cell culture in mineralization media. Experiments revealed that the most compliant nanolattices had ∼20% more intracellular f-actin and ∼40% more Ca and P secreted onto them than the stiffer nanolattices, where such cellular response was virtually indistinguishable. We constructed a simple phenomenological model that appears to capture the observed relation between scaffold stiffness and f-actin concentration. This model predicts a range of optimal scaffold stiffnesses for maximum f-actin concentration, which appears to be directly correlated with osteoblast-driven mineral deposition. This work suggests that three-dimensional scaffolds with titania-coated surfaces may provide an optimal microenvironment for cell growth when their stiffness is similar to that of cartilage (∼0.5-3MPa). These findings help provide a greater understanding of osteoblast mechanosensitivity and may have profound implications in developing more effective and safer bone prostheses. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE: Creating prostheses that lead to optimal bone remodeling has been a challenge for more than two decades because of a lack of thorough knowledge of cell behavior in three-dimensional (3D) environments. Literature has shown that 2D substrate stiffness plays a significant role in determining cell behavior, however, limitations in fabrication techniques and difficulties in characterizing cell-scaffold interactions have limited our understanding of how 3D scaffolds' stiffness affects cell response. The present study shows that scaffold structural stiffness affects osteoblasts cellular response. Specifically this work shows that the cells grown on the most compliant nanolattices with a stiffness of 0.7MPa expressed ∼20% higher concentration of intracellular f-actin and secreted ∼40% more Ca and P compared with all other nanolattices. This suggests that bone scaffolds with a stiffness close to that of cartilage may serve as optimal 3D scaffolds for new synthetic bone graft materials.
Authors: T A Owen; M Aronow; V Shalhoub; L M Barone; L Wilming; M S Tassinari; M B Kennedy; S Pockwinse; J B Lian; G S Stein Journal: J Cell Physiol Date: 1990-06 Impact factor: 6.384
Authors: Steven M Kurtz; Kevin L Ong; Jordana Schmier; Fionna Mowat; Khaled Saleh; Eva Dybvik; Johan Kärrholm; Göran Garellick; Leif I Havelin; Ove Furnes; Henrik Malchau; Edmund Lau Journal: J Bone Joint Surg Am Date: 2007-10 Impact factor: 5.284
Authors: Adam E Jakus; Alexandra L Rutz; Sumanas W Jordan; Abhishek Kannan; Sean M Mitchell; Chawon Yun; Katie D Koube; Sung C Yoo; Herbert E Whiteley; Claus-Peter Richter; Robert D Galiano; Wellington K Hsu; Stuart R Stock; Erin L Hsu; Ramille N Shah Journal: Sci Transl Med Date: 2016-09-28 Impact factor: 17.956
Authors: Piotr Stanisław Zieliński; Pavan Kumar Reddy Gudeti; Timo Rikmanspoel; Małgorzata Katarzyna Włodarczyk-Biegun Journal: Bioact Mater Date: 2022-04-23
Authors: Noah Z Laird; Timothy M Acri; Jaidev L Chakka; Juliana C Quarterman; Walla I Malkawi; Satheesh Elangovan; Aliasger K Salem Journal: Eur J Pharm Biopharm Date: 2021-02-05 Impact factor: 5.589
Authors: Antonio Perez-Moreno; María de Las Virtudes Reyes-Peces; Deseada María de Los Santos; Gonzalo Pinaglia-Tobaruela; Emilio de la Orden; José Ignacio Vilches-Pérez; Mercedes Salido; Manuel Piñero; Nicolás de la Rosa-Fox Journal: Polymers (Basel) Date: 2020-11-26 Impact factor: 4.329
Authors: Tomasz Szymański; Adam Aron Mieloch; Magdalena Richter; Tomasz Trzeciak; Ewa Florek; Jakub Dalibor Rybka; Michael Giersig Journal: Materials (Basel) Date: 2020-09-11 Impact factor: 3.623