Literature DB >> 28923538

Three-dimensional nano-architected scaffolds with tunable stiffness for efficient bone tissue growth.

Alessandro Maggi1, Hanqing Li2, Julia R Greer3.   

Abstract

The precise mechanisms that lead to orthopedic implant failure are not well understood; it is believed that the micromechanical environment at the bone-implant interface regulates structural stability of an implant. In this work, we seek to understand how the 3D mechanical environment of an implant affects bone formation during early osteointegration. We employed two-photon lithography (TPL) direct laser writing to fabricate 3-dimensional rigid polymer scaffolds with tetrakaidecahedral periodic geometry, herewith referred to as nanolattices, whose strut dimensions were on the same order as osteoblasts' focal adhesions (∼2μm) and pore sizes on the order of cell size, ∼10μm. Some of these nanolattices were subsequently coated with thin conformal layers of Ti or W, and a final outer layer of 18nm-thick TiO2 was deposited on all samples to ensure biocompatibility. Nanomechanical experiments on each type of nanolattice revealed the range of stiffnesses of 0.7-100MPa. Osteoblast-like cells (SAOS-2) were seeded on each nanolattice, and their mechanosensitve response was explored by tracking mineral secretions and intracellular f-actin and vinculin concentrations after 2, 8 and 12days of cell culture in mineralization media. Experiments revealed that the most compliant nanolattices had ∼20% more intracellular f-actin and ∼40% more Ca and P secreted onto them than the stiffer nanolattices, where such cellular response was virtually indistinguishable. We constructed a simple phenomenological model that appears to capture the observed relation between scaffold stiffness and f-actin concentration. This model predicts a range of optimal scaffold stiffnesses for maximum f-actin concentration, which appears to be directly correlated with osteoblast-driven mineral deposition. This work suggests that three-dimensional scaffolds with titania-coated surfaces may provide an optimal microenvironment for cell growth when their stiffness is similar to that of cartilage (∼0.5-3MPa). These findings help provide a greater understanding of osteoblast mechanosensitivity and may have profound implications in developing more effective and safer bone prostheses. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE: Creating prostheses that lead to optimal bone remodeling has been a challenge for more than two decades because of a lack of thorough knowledge of cell behavior in three-dimensional (3D) environments. Literature has shown that 2D substrate stiffness plays a significant role in determining cell behavior, however, limitations in fabrication techniques and difficulties in characterizing cell-scaffold interactions have limited our understanding of how 3D scaffolds' stiffness affects cell response. The present study shows that scaffold structural stiffness affects osteoblasts cellular response. Specifically this work shows that the cells grown on the most compliant nanolattices with a stiffness of 0.7MPa expressed ∼20% higher concentration of intracellular f-actin and secreted ∼40% more Ca and P compared with all other nanolattices. This suggests that bone scaffolds with a stiffness close to that of cartilage may serve as optimal 3D scaffolds for new synthetic bone graft materials.
Copyright © 2017 Acta Materialia Inc. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Mechanical characterization; Mechanics; Micro fabrication; Mineralization; Scaffold; Two-photon lithography

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28923538      PMCID: PMC5663471          DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2017.09.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Biomater        ISSN: 1742-7061            Impact factor:   8.947


  40 in total

Review 1.  Tissue cells feel and respond to the stiffness of their substrate.

Authors:  Dennis E Discher; Paul Janmey; Yu-Li Wang
Journal:  Science       Date:  2005-11-18       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Progressive development of the rat osteoblast phenotype in vitro: reciprocal relationships in expression of genes associated with osteoblast proliferation and differentiation during formation of the bone extracellular matrix.

Authors:  T A Owen; M Aronow; V Shalhoub; L M Barone; L Wilming; M S Tassinari; M B Kennedy; S Pockwinse; J B Lian; G S Stein
Journal:  J Cell Physiol       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 6.384

3.  Future clinical and economic impact of revision total hip and knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Steven M Kurtz; Kevin L Ong; Jordana Schmier; Fionna Mowat; Khaled Saleh; Eva Dybvik; Johan Kärrholm; Göran Garellick; Leif I Havelin; Ove Furnes; Henrik Malchau; Edmund Lau
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 5.284

4.  Mechanotransduction across the cell surface and through the cytoskeleton.

Authors:  N Wang; J P Butler; D E Ingber
Journal:  Science       Date:  1993-05-21       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 5.  Materials as stem cell regulators.

Authors:  William L Murphy; Todd C McDevitt; Adam J Engler
Journal:  Nat Mater       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 43.841

6.  Strong, lightweight, and recoverable three-dimensional ceramic nanolattices.

Authors:  Lucas R Meza; Satyajit Das; Julia R Greer
Journal:  Science       Date:  2014-09-12       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Hyperelastic "bone": A highly versatile, growth factor-free, osteoregenerative, scalable, and surgically friendly biomaterial.

Authors:  Adam E Jakus; Alexandra L Rutz; Sumanas W Jordan; Abhishek Kannan; Sean M Mitchell; Chawon Yun; Katie D Koube; Sung C Yoo; Herbert E Whiteley; Claus-Peter Richter; Robert D Galiano; Wellington K Hsu; Stuart R Stock; Erin L Hsu; Ramille N Shah
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2016-09-28       Impact factor: 17.956

8.  Taking cell-matrix adhesions to the third dimension.

Authors:  E Cukierman; R Pankov; D R Stevens; K M Yamada
Journal:  Science       Date:  2001-11-23       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Bioactive glass scaffolds for bone tissue engineering: state of the art and future perspectives.

Authors:  Qiang Fu; Eduardo Saiz; Mohamed N Rahaman; Antoni P Tomsia
Journal:  Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl       Date:  2011-10-10       Impact factor: 7.328

Review 10.  A review of the mechanical behavior of CaP and CaP/polymer composites for applications in bone replacement and repair.

Authors:  Amy J Wagoner Johnson; Brad A Herschler
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2010-07-21       Impact factor: 8.947

View more
  7 in total

1.  Calcium phosphate coated 3D printed porous titanium with nanoscale surface modification for orthopedic and dental applications.

Authors:  Susmita Bose; Dishary Banerjee; Anish Shivaram; Solaiman Tarafder; Amit Bandyopadhyay
Journal:  Mater Des       Date:  2018-04-18       Impact factor: 7.991

2.  3D printing of bio-instructive materials: Toward directing the cell.

Authors:  Piotr Stanisław Zieliński; Pavan Kumar Reddy Gudeti; Timo Rikmanspoel; Małgorzata Katarzyna Włodarczyk-Biegun
Journal:  Bioact Mater       Date:  2022-04-23

Review 3.  Applications of nanotechnology in 3D printed tissue engineering scaffolds.

Authors:  Noah Z Laird; Timothy M Acri; Jaidev L Chakka; Juliana C Quarterman; Walla I Malkawi; Satheesh Elangovan; Aliasger K Salem
Journal:  Eur J Pharm Biopharm       Date:  2021-02-05       Impact factor: 5.589

4.  Lightweight, flaw-tolerant, and ultrastrong nanoarchitected carbon.

Authors:  Xuan Zhang; Andrey Vyatskikh; Huajian Gao; Julia R Greer; Xiaoyan Li
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-03-18       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Functionally Graded Scaffolds with Programmable Pore Size Distribution Based on Triply Periodic Minimal Surface Fabricated by Selective Laser Melting.

Authors:  Xueyong Zhou; Yuan Jin; Jianke Du
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2020-11-09       Impact factor: 3.623

6.  Hydroxyl Groups Induce Bioactivity in Silica/Chitosan Aerogels Designed for Bone Tissue Engineering. In Vitro Model for the Assessment of Osteoblasts Behavior.

Authors:  Antonio Perez-Moreno; María de Las Virtudes Reyes-Peces; Deseada María de Los Santos; Gonzalo Pinaglia-Tobaruela; Emilio de la Orden; José Ignacio Vilches-Pérez; Mercedes Salido; Manuel Piñero; Nicolás de la Rosa-Fox
Journal:  Polymers (Basel)       Date:  2020-11-26       Impact factor: 4.329

Review 7.  Utilization of Carbon Nanotubes in Manufacturing of 3D Cartilage and Bone Scaffolds.

Authors:  Tomasz Szymański; Adam Aron Mieloch; Magdalena Richter; Tomasz Trzeciak; Ewa Florek; Jakub Dalibor Rybka; Michael Giersig
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2020-09-11       Impact factor: 3.623

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.