Literature DB >> 32323248

Recent Research Advances in Biologic Bone Graft Materials for Spine Surgery.

Mark A Plantz1, Wellington K Hsu1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Biologic bone graft materials continue to be an important component of various spinal fusion procedures. Given the known risks and morbidity of harvesting iliac crest bone graft, the historical gold standard for spinal fusion, these biologic materials serve the purpose of improving both the efficacy and safety of spinal fusion procedures. Recent advances in biomedical and materials sciences have enabled the design of many novel materials that have shown promise as effective bone graft materials. This review will discuss current research pertaining to several of these materials, including functionalized peptide amphiphiles and other nanocomposites, novel demineralized bone matrix applications, 3D-printed materials, and Hyperelastic Bone®, among others. RECENT
FINDINGS: Recent investigation has demonstrated that novel technologies, including nanotechnology and 3D printing, can be used to produce biomaterials with significant osteogenic potential. Notably, peptide amphiphile nanomaterials functionalized to bind BMP-2 have demonstrated significant bone regenerative capacity in a pre-clinical rodent posterolateral lumbar fusion (PLF) model. Additionally, 3D-printed Hyperelastic Bone® has demonstrated promising bone regenerative capacity in several in vivo animal models. Composite materials such as TrioMatrix® (demineralized bone matrix, hydroxyapatite, and nanofiber-based collagen scaffold) have also demonstrated significant osteogenic potential in both in vitro and in vivo settings. Advances in materials science and engineering have allowed for the design and implementation of several novel biologic materials, including nanocomposites, 3D-printed materials, and various biologic composites. These materials provide significant bone regenerative capacity and have the potential to be alternatives to other bone graft materials, such as autograft and BMP-2, which have known complications.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biologics; Biomaterials; Bone regeneration; Nanotechnology; Spine fusion

Year:  2020        PMID: 32323248      PMCID: PMC7251006          DOI: 10.1007/s12178-020-09620-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med        ISSN: 1935-9748


  41 in total

Review 1.  Allograft bone. The influence of processing on safety and performance.

Authors:  T Boyce; J Edwards; N Scarborough
Journal:  Orthop Clin North Am       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 2.472

2.  Peptide-amphiphile nanofibers: a versatile scaffold for the preparation of self-assembling materials.

Authors:  Jeffrey D Hartgerink; Elia Beniash; Samuel I Stupp
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-04-02       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Spinal fusion in the United States: analysis of trends from 1998 to 2008.

Authors:  Sean S Rajaee; Hyun W Bae; Linda E A Kanim; Rick B Delamarter
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2012-01-01       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Gel scaffolds of BMP-2-binding peptide amphiphile nanofibers for spinal arthrodesis.

Authors:  Sungsoo S Lee; Erin L Hsu; Marco Mendoza; Jason Ghodasra; Michael S Nickoli; Amruta Ashtekar; Mahesh Polavarapu; Jacob Babu; Rehan M Riaz; Joseph D Nicolas; David Nelson; Sohaib Z Hashmi; Start R Kaltz; Jeffrey S Earhart; Bradley R Merk; Jeff S McKee; Shawn F Bairstow; Ramille N Shah; Wellington K Hsu; Samuel I Stupp
Journal:  Adv Healthc Mater       Date:  2014-04-22       Impact factor: 9.933

5.  Bone extracellular matrix hydrogel enhances osteogenic differentiation of C2C12 myoblasts and mouse primary calvarial cells.

Authors:  Noura Alom; Heather Peto; Glen R Kirkham; Kevin M Shakesheff; Lisa J White
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater       Date:  2017-04-21       Impact factor: 3.368

Review 6.  Biologics in spine arthrodesis.

Authors:  Abhishek Kannan; Shah-Nawaz M Dodwad; Wellington K Hsu
Journal:  J Spinal Disord Tech       Date:  2015-06

7.  National trends in anterior cervical fusion procedures.

Authors:  Satyajit Marawar; Federico P Girardi; Andrew A Sama; Yan Ma; Licia K Gaber-Baylis; Melanie C Besculides; Stavros G Memtsoudis
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2010-07-01       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Heparin binding nanostructures to promote growth of blood vessels.

Authors:  Kanya Rajangam; Heather A Behanna; Michael J Hui; Xiaoqiang Han; James F Hulvat; Jon W Lomasney; Samuel I Stupp
Journal:  Nano Lett       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 11.189

9.  Trends in Lumbar Fusion Procedure Rates and Associated Hospital Costs for Degenerative Spinal Diseases in the United States, 2004 to 2015.

Authors:  Brook I Martin; Sohail K Mirza; Nicholas Spina; William R Spiker; Brandon Lawrence; Darrel S Brodke
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2019-03-01       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Donor site morbidity after anterior iliac crest bone harvest for single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion.

Authors:  Jeff S Silber; D Greg Anderson; Scott D Daffner; Brian T Brislin; J Martin Leland; Alan S Hilibrand; Alexander R Vaccaro; Todd J Albert
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2003-01-15       Impact factor: 3.468

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Therapeutics for enhancement of spinal fusion: A mini review.

Authors:  Yidan Zhang; Yu Jiang; Da Zou; Baozhi Yuan; Hua Zhu Ke; Weishi Li
Journal:  J Orthop Translat       Date:  2021-12-06       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Surgeon experience influences patient characteristics and outcomes in spine deformity surgery.

Authors:  Alexander J Schupper; Sean N Neifert; Michael L Martini; Jonathan S Gal; Frank J Yuk; John M Caridi
Journal:  Spine Deform       Date:  2020-10-26

3.  Bone induction and defect repair by true bone ceramics incorporated with rhBMP-2 and Sr.

Authors:  Chunli Zhang; Gang Xu; Liwei Han; Xiantong Hu; Yantao Zhao; Zhonghai Li
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2021-08-24       Impact factor: 3.896

4.  Evolution of evidence in spinal surgery - past, present and future Scientometric analysis of randomized controlled trials in spinal surgery.

Authors:  Sathish Muthu; Madhan Jeyaraman; Naveen Jeyaraman
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2022-09-18
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.