Literature DB >> 31469055

3D-Printed Ceramic-Demineralized Bone Matrix Hyperelastic Bone Composite Scaffolds for Spinal Fusion.

J Adam Driscoll1,2, Ryan Lubbe1,2, Adam E Jakus2,3,4, Kevin Chang1,2, Meraaj Haleem1,2, Chawon Yun1,2, Gurmit Singh1,2, Andrew D Schneider1,2, Karina M Katchko1,2, Carmen Soriano5, Michael Newton6, Tristan Maerz6,7, Xin Li2, Kevin Baker6,8, Wellington K Hsu1,2, Ramille N Shah2,3,4,6,9, Stuart R Stock2,10, Erin L Hsu1,2.   

Abstract

Although numerous spinal biologics are commercially available, a cost-effective and safe bone graft substitute material for spine fusion has yet to be proven. In this study, "3D-Paints" containing varying volumetric ratios of hydroxyapatite (HA) and human demineralized bone matrix (DBM) in a poly(lactide-co-glycolide) elastomer were three-dimensional (3D) printed into scaffolds to promote osteointegration in rats, with an end goal of spine fusion without the need for recombinant growth factor. Spine fusion was evaluated by manual palpation, and osteointegration and de novo bone formation within scaffold struts were evaluated by laboratory and synchrotron microcomputed tomography and histology. The 3:1 HA:DBM composite achieved the highest mean fusion score and fusion rate (92%), which was significantly greater than the 3D printed DBM-only scaffold (42%). New bone was identified extending from the host transverse processes into the scaffold macropores, and osteointegration scores correlated with successful fusion. Strikingly, the combination of HA and DBM resulted in the growth of bone-like spicules within the DBM particles inside scaffold struts. These spicules were not observed in DBM-only scaffolds, suggesting that de novo spicule formation requires both HA and DBM. Collectively, our work suggests that this recombinant growth factor-free composite shows promise to overcome the limitations of currently used bone graft substitutes for spine fusion. Impact Statement Currently, there exists a no safe, yet highly effective, bone graft substitute that is well accepted for use in spine fusion procedures. With this work, we show that a three-dimensional printed scaffold containing osteoconductive hydroxyapatite and osteoinductive demineralized bone matrix that promotes new bone spicule formation, osteointegration, and successful fusion (stabilization) when implemented in a preclinical model of spine fusion. Our study suggests that this material shows promise as a recombinant growth factor-free bone graft substitute that could safely promote high rates of successful fusion and improve patient care.

Entities:  

Keywords:  3D printing; demineralized bone matrix; hydroxyapatite; osteointegration; spine fusion

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31469055      PMCID: PMC7044791          DOI: 10.1089/ten.TEA.2019.0166

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A        ISSN: 1937-3341            Impact factor:   3.845


  25 in total

1.  Outcomes following nonoperative and operative treatment for cervical disc herniations in National Football League athletes.

Authors:  Wellington K Hsu
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2011-05-01       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 2.  A critical review of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 trials in spinal surgery: emerging safety concerns and lessons learned.

Authors:  Eugene J Carragee; Eric L Hurwitz; Bradley K Weiner
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 4.166

3.  Hyperelastic "bone": A highly versatile, growth factor-free, osteoregenerative, scalable, and surgically friendly biomaterial.

Authors:  Adam E Jakus; Alexandra L Rutz; Sumanas W Jordan; Abhishek Kannan; Sean M Mitchell; Chawon Yun; Katie D Koube; Sung C Yoo; Herbert E Whiteley; Claus-Peter Richter; Robert D Galiano; Wellington K Hsu; Stuart R Stock; Erin L Hsu; Ramille N Shah
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2016-09-28       Impact factor: 17.956

4.  Bone: formation by autoinduction.

Authors:  M R Urist
Journal:  Science       Date:  1965-11-12       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 5.  Guideline update for the performance of fusion procedures for degenerative disease of the lumbar spine. Part 16: bone graft extenders and substitutes as an adjunct for lumbar fusion.

Authors:  Michael G Kaiser; Michael W Groff; William C Watters; Zoher Ghogawala; Praveen V Mummaneni; Andrew T Dailey; Tanvir F Choudhri; Jason C Eck; Alok Sharan; Jeffrey C Wang; Sanjay S Dhall; Daniel K Resnick
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2014-07

6.  Comparison of lumbar spine fusion using mixed and cloned marrow cells.

Authors:  Q Cui; Z Ming Xiao; G Balian; G J Wang
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2001-11-01       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Dioxin Exposure Impairs BMP-2-Mediated Spinal Fusion in a Rat Arthrodesis Model.

Authors:  Erin L Hsu; Kevin Sonn; Abhishek Kannan; Sharath Bellary; Chawon Yun; Sohaib Hashmi; John Nelson; Marco Mendoza; Michael Nickoli; Jason Ghodasra; Christian Park; Sean Mitchell; Amruta Ashtekar; Anjan Ghosh; Akshay Jain; Stuart R Stock; Wellington K Hsu
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2015-06-17       Impact factor: 5.284

8.  Anti-Inflammatory Peptide Attenuates Edema and Promotes BMP-2-Induced Bone Formation in Spine Fusion.

Authors:  Juliane D Glaeser; Khosrowdad Salehi; Linda E A Kanim; Dmitriy Sheyn; Zachary NaPier; Phillip H Behrens; Leslie Garcia; Jason M Cuéllar; Hyun W Bae
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2018-07-03       Impact factor: 3.845

9.  Comparison of lentiviral and adenoviral gene therapy for spinal fusion in rats.

Authors:  Masashi Miyazaki; Osamu Sugiyama; Jun Zou; Seung Hwan Yoon; Feng Wei; Yuichiro Morishita; Chananit Sintuu; Mandeep S Virk; Jay R Lieberman; Jeffrey C Wang
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2008-06-01       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Basic science and spine literature document bone morphogenetic protein increases cancer risk.

Authors:  Nancy E Epstein
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2014-12-30
View more
  6 in total

1.  Osteoinductivity and biomechanical assessment of a 3D printed demineralized bone matrix-ceramic composite in a rat spine fusion model.

Authors:  Mark A Plantz; Silvia Minardi; Joseph G Lyons; Allison C Greene; David J Ellenbogen; Mitchell Hallman; Jonathan T Yamaguchi; Soyeon Jeong; Chawon Yun; Adam E Jakus; Kenneth R Blank; Robert M Havey; Muturi Muriuki; Avinash G Patwardhan; Ramille N Shah; Wellington K Hsu; Stuart R Stock; Erin L Hsu
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2021-04-06       Impact factor: 10.633

Review 2.  Novel Approaches Guiding the Future of Spinal Biologics for Bone Regeneration.

Authors:  Eileen N Phan; Wellington K Hsu
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2022-04-18

3.  Inclusion of a 3D-printed Hyperelastic Bone mesh improves mechanical and osteogenic performance of a mineralized collagen scaffold.

Authors:  Marley J Dewey; Andrey V Nosatov; Kiran Subedi; Ramille Shah; Adam Jakus; Brendan A C Harley
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2020-11-21       Impact factor: 8.947

4.  Preclinical Safety of a 3D-Printed Hydroxyapatite-Demineralized Bone Matrix Scaffold for Spinal Fusion.

Authors:  Mark Plantz; Joseph Lyons; Jonathan T Yamaguchi; Allison C Greene; David J Ellenbogen; Mitchell J Hallman; Vivek Shah; Chawon Yun; Adam E Jakus; Daniele Procissi; Silvia Minardi; Ramille N Shah; Wellington K Hsu; Erin L Hsu
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2022-01-01       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Influence of Geometry and Architecture on the In Vivo Success of 3D-Printed Scaffolds for Spinal Fusion.

Authors:  Mitchell Hallman; J Adam Driscoll; Ryan Lubbe; Soyeon Jeong; Kevin Chang; Meraaj Haleem; Adam Jakus; Richard Pahapill; Chawon Yun; Ramille Shah; Wellington K Hsu; Stuart R Stock; Erin L Hsu
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2020-03-26       Impact factor: 3.845

Review 6.  Innovative Molecular and Cellular Therapeutics in Cleft Palate Tissue Engineering.

Authors:  Jeremie D Oliver; Shihai Jia; Leslie R Halpern; Emily M Graham; Emma C Turner; John S Colombo; David W Grainger; Rena N D'Souza
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part B Rev       Date:  2020-09-28       Impact factor: 7.376

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.