Literature DB >> 26858416

Warning signals are under positive frequency-dependent selection in nature.

Mathieu Chouteau1, Mónica Arias2, Mathieu Joron3.   

Abstract

Positive frequency-dependent selection (FDS) is a selection regime where the fitness of a phenotype increases with its frequency, and it is thought to underlie important adaptive strategies resting on signaling and communication. However, whether and how positive FDS truly operates in nature remains unknown, which hampers our understanding of signal diversity. Here, we test for positive FDS operating on the warning color patterns of chemically defended butterflies forming multiple coexisting mimicry assemblages in the Amazon. Using malleable prey models placed in localities showing differences in the relative frequencies of warningly colored prey, we demonstrate that the efficiency of a warning signal increases steadily with its local frequency in the natural community, up to a threshold where protection stabilizes. The shape of this relationship is consistent with the direct effect of the local abundance of each warning signal on the corresponding avoidance knowledge of the local predator community. This relationship, which differs from purifying selection acting on each mimetic pattern, indicates that predator knowledge, integrated over the entire community, is saturated only for the most common warning signals. In contrast, among the well-established warning signals present in local prey assemblages, most are incompletely known to local predators and enjoy incomplete protection. This incomplete predator knowledge should generate strong benefits to life history traits that enhance warning efficiency by increasing the effective frequency of prey visible to predators. Strategies such as gregariousness or niche convergence between comimics may therefore readily evolve through their effects on predator knowledge and warning efficiency.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Müllerian mimicry; aposematism; butterflies; predation; warning signal

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26858416      PMCID: PMC4776528          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1519216113

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  30 in total

1.  Can receiver psychology explain the evolution of aposematism?

Authors:  Michael P. Speed
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 2.844

2.  Variations in cone photoreceptor abundance and the visual ecology of birds.

Authors:  N S Hart
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 1.836

3.  Mimicry: an interface between psychology and evolution.

Authors:  J Mallet
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-07-31       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Balancing selection on a floral polymorphism.

Authors:  B Subramaniam; M D Rausher
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 3.694

5.  Natural selection on polymorphic malaria antigens and the search for a vaccine.

Authors:  D J Conway
Journal:  Parasitol Today       Date:  1997-01

6.  Specialized avian predators repeatedly attack novel color morphs of Heliconius butterflies.

Authors:  Gary M Langham
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 3.694

7.  Three-butterfly system provides a field test of müllerian mimicry.

Authors:  D D Kapan
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-01-18       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Visual pigments, oil droplets, ocular media and cone photoreceptor distribution in two species of passerine bird: the blue tit (Parus caeruleus L.) and the blackbird (Turdus merula L.).

Authors:  N S Hart; J C Partridge; I C Cuthill; A T Bennett
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 1.836

9.  Polymorphic mimicry, microhabitat use, and sex-specific behaviour.

Authors:  M Joron
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 2.411

10.  Vision in the peafowl (Aves: Pavo cristatus).

Authors:  Nathan S Hart
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 3.312

View more
  36 in total

1.  Neural divergence and hybrid disruption between ecologically isolated Heliconius butterflies.

Authors:  Stephen H Montgomery; Matteo Rossi; W Owen McMillan; Richard M Merrill
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-02-09       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  How do predators generalize warning signals in simple and complex prey communities? Insights from a videogame.

Authors:  Mónica Arias; John W Davey; Simon Martin; Chris Jiggins; Nicola Nadeau; Mathieu Joron; Violaine Llaurens
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2020-02-19       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Intraspecific sequence and gene expression variation contribute little to venom diversity in sidewinder rattlesnakes ( Crotalus cerastes).

Authors:  Rhett M Rautsaw; Erich P Hofmann; Mark J Margres; Matthew L Holding; Jason L Strickland; Andrew J Mason; Darin R Rokyta; Christopher L Parkinson
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-07-03       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Dominant words rise to the top by positive frequency-dependent selection.

Authors:  Mark Pagel; Mark Beaumont; Andrew Meade; Annemarie Verkerk; Andreea Calude
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-03-21       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Mutation load at a mimicry supergene sheds new light on the evolution of inversion polymorphisms.

Authors:  Paul Jay; Mathieu Chouteau; Annabel Whibley; Héloïse Bastide; Hugues Parrinello; Violaine Llaurens; Mathieu Joron
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2021-01-25       Impact factor: 38.330

6.  The Scent Chemistry of Heliconius Wing Androconia.

Authors:  Florian Mann; Sohini Vanjari; Neil Rosser; Sandra Mann; Kanchon K Dasmahapatra; Chris Corbin; Mauricio Linares; Carolina Pardo-Diaz; Camilo Salazar; Chris Jiggins; Stefan Schulz
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2017-08-08       Impact factor: 2.626

7.  Maintaining mimicry diversity: optimal warning colour patterns differ among microhabitats in Amazonian clearwing butterflies.

Authors:  Keith R Willmott; Julia C Robinson Willmott; Marianne Elias; Chris D Jiggins
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-05-31       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Mimics here and there, but not everywhere: Müllerian mimicry in Ceroglossus ground beetles?

Authors:  Carlos P Muñoz-Ramírez; Pierre-Paul Bitton; Stéphanie M Doucet; Lacey L Knowles
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 3.703

9.  No link between nymph and adult coloration in shield bugs: weak selection by predators.

Authors:  Iliana Medina; Regina Vega-Trejo; Thomas Wallenius; Damien Esquerré; Constanza León; Daniela M Perez; Megan L Head
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2020-06-24       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  Polymorphism at a mimicry supergene maintained by opposing frequency-dependent selection pressures.

Authors:  Mathieu Chouteau; Violaine Llaurens; Florence Piron-Prunier; Mathieu Joron
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-07-03       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.