Literature DB >> 27673275

Decoupling of excitation and receive coils in pulsed magnetic resonance using sinusoidal magnetic field modulation.

Mark Tseytlin1, Boris Epel2, Subramanian Sundramoorthy2, Dmitriy Tipikin3, Howard J Halpern2.   

Abstract

In pulsed magnetic resonance, the excitation power is many orders of magnitude larger than that induced by the spin system in the receiving coil or resonator. The receiver must be protected during and immediately after the excitation pulse to allow for the energy stored in the resonator to dissipate to a safe level. The time during which the signal is not detected, the instrumental dead-time, can be shortened by using magnetically decoupled excitation and receive coils. Such coils are oriented, with respect to each other, in a way that minimizes the total magnetic flux produced by one coil in the other. We suggest that magnetically decoupled coils can be isolated to a larger degree by tuning them to separate frequencies. Spins are excited at one frequency, and the echo signal is detected at another. Sinusoidal magnetic field modulation that rapidly changes the Larmor frequency of the spins between the excitation and detection events is used to ensure the resonance conditions for both coils. In this study, the relaxation times of trityl-CD3 were measured in a field-modulated pulsed EPR experiment and compared to results obtained using a standard spin echo method. The excitation and receive coils were tuned to 245 and 256.7MHz, respectively. Using an available rapid-scan, cross-loop EPR resonator, we demonstrated an isolation improvement of approximately 20-30dB due to frequency decoupling. Theoretical analysis, numerical simulations, and proof-of-concept experiments demonstrated that substantial excitation-detection decoupling can be achieved. A pulsed L-band system, including a small volume bi-modal resonator equipped with modulation coils, was constructed to demonstrate fivefold dead-time reduction in comparison with the standard EPR experiment. This was achieved by detuning of the excitation and receive coils by 26MHz and using sinusoidal modulation at 480kHz.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bi-modal resonators; EPR imaging; Field modulated pulsed EPR; Pulsed EPR

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27673275      PMCID: PMC5071169          DOI: 10.1016/j.jmr.2016.09.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Magn Reson        ISSN: 1090-7807            Impact factor:   2.229


  9 in total

1.  Fourier-transform electron spin resonance with bandwidth-compensated chirp pulses.

Authors:  Andrin Doll; Gunnar Jeschke
Journal:  J Magn Reson       Date:  2014-06-30       Impact factor: 2.229

2.  Rapid frequency scan EPR.

Authors:  Mark Tseitlin; George A Rinard; Richard W Quine; Sandra S Eaton; Gareth R Eaton
Journal:  J Magn Reson       Date:  2011-05-19       Impact factor: 2.229

3.  A Wire Crossed-Loop-Resonator for Rapid Scan EPR.

Authors:  George A Rinard; Richard W Quine; Joshua R Biller; Gareth R Eaton
Journal:  Concepts Magn Reson Part B Magn Reson Eng       Date:  2010-04-09       Impact factor: 1.176

4.  Computationally Efficient Steady-State Solution of the Bloch Equations for Rapid Sinusoidal Scans Based on Fourier Expansion in Harmonics of the Scan Frequency.

Authors:  Mark Tseitlin; Gareth R Eaton; Sandra S Eaton
Journal:  Appl Magn Reson       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 0.831

5.  Digital EPR with an arbitrary waveform generator and direct detection at the carrier frequency.

Authors:  Mark Tseitlin; Richard W Quine; George A Rinard; Sandra S Eaton; Gareth R Eaton
Journal:  J Magn Reson       Date:  2011-09-14       Impact factor: 2.229

6.  Deconvolution of sinusoidal rapid EPR scans.

Authors:  Mark Tseitlin; George A Rinard; Richard W Quine; Sandra S Eaton; Gareth R Eaton
Journal:  J Magn Reson       Date:  2010-11-26       Impact factor: 2.229

7.  Rapid-scan EPR with triangular scans and fourier deconvolution to recover the slow-scan spectrum.

Authors:  Janhavi P Joshi; John R Ballard; George A Rinard; Richard W Quine; Sandra S Eaton; Gareth R Eaton
Journal:  J Magn Reson       Date:  2005-04-14       Impact factor: 2.229

8.  A Versatile High Speed 250 MHz Pulse Imager for Biomedical Applications.

Authors:  Boris Epel; Subramanian V Sundramoorthy; Colin Mailer; Howard J Halpern
Journal:  Concepts Magn Reson Part B Magn Reson Eng       Date:  2008-07-10       Impact factor: 1.176

9.  Orthogonal resonators for pulse in vivo electron paramagnetic imaging at 250 MHz.

Authors:  Subramanian V Sundramoorthy; Boris Epel; Howard J Halpern
Journal:  J Magn Reson       Date:  2014-01-21       Impact factor: 2.229

  9 in total
  2 in total

1.  Modular imaging system: Rapid scan EPR at 800 MHz.

Authors:  Oxana Tseytlin; Priyaankadevi Guggilapu; Andrey A Bobko; Hussien AlAhmad; Xuan Xu; Boris Epel; Ryan O'Connell; Emily H Hoblitzell; Timothy D Eubank; Valery V Khramtsov; Benoit Driesschaert; Eiad Kazkaz; Mark Tseytlin
Journal:  J Magn Reson       Date:  2019-06-08       Impact factor: 2.229

2.  Rapid Scan EPR imaging as a Tool for Magnetic Field Mapping.

Authors:  Oxana Tseytlin; Andrey A Bobko; Mark Tseytlin
Journal:  Appl Magn Reson       Date:  2020-09-25       Impact factor: 0.831

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.