| Literature DB >> 27660390 |
Akira Sassa1, Melike Çağlayan2, Yesenia Rodriguez2, William A Beard2, Samuel H Wilson2, Takehiko Nohmi3, Masamitsu Honma3, Manabu Yasui4.
Abstract
Numerous ribonucleotides are incorporated into the genome during DNA replication. Oxidized ribonucleotides can also be erroneously incorporated into DNA. Embedded ribonucleotides destabilize the structure of DNA and retard DNA synthesis by DNA polymerases (pols), leading to genomic instability. Mammalian cells possess translesion DNA synthesis (TLS) pols that bypass DNA damage. The mechanism of TLS and repair of oxidized ribonucleotides remains to be elucidated. To address this, we analyzed the miscoding properties of the ribonucleotides riboguanosine (rG) and 7,8-dihydro-8-oxo-riboguanosine (8-oxo-rG) during TLS catalyzed by the human TLS pols κ and η in vitro The primer extension reaction catalyzed by human replicative pol α was strongly blocked by 8-oxo-rG. pol κ inefficiently bypassed rG and 8-oxo-rG compared with dG and 7,8-dihydro-8-oxo-2'-deoxyguanosine (8-oxo-dG), whereas pol η easily bypassed the ribonucleotides. pol α exclusively inserted dAMP opposite 8-oxo-rG. Interestingly, pol κ preferentially inserted dCMP opposite 8-oxo-rG, whereas the insertion of dAMP was favored opposite 8-oxo-dG. In addition, pol η accurately bypassed 8-oxo-rG. Furthermore, we examined the activity of the base excision repair (BER) enzymes 8-oxoguanine DNA glycosylase (OGG1) and apurinic/apyrimidinic endonuclease 1 on the substrates, including rG and 8-oxo-rG. Both BER enzymes were completely inactive against 8-oxo-rG in DNA. However, OGG1 suppressed 8-oxo-rG excision by RNase H2, which is involved in the removal of ribonucleotides from DNA. These results suggest that the different sugar backbones between 8-oxo-rG and 8-oxo-dG alter the capacity of TLS and repair of 8-oxoguanine.Entities:
Keywords: 8-oxoguanine (8-oxoG); DNA damage; DNA polymerase; base excision repair (BER); oxidative stress; ribonucleotide; translesion DNA synthesis
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27660390 PMCID: PMC5104951 DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M116.738732
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Biol Chem ISSN: 0021-9258 Impact factor: 5.157