Literature DB >> 27649220

Utilizing Chinese Admission Records for MACE Prediction of Acute Coronary Syndrome.

Danqing Hu1, Zhengxing Huang2, Tak-Ming Chan3, Wei Dong4, Xudong Lu5, Huilong Duan6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Clinical major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE) prediction of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is important for a number of applications including physician decision support, quality of care assessment, and efficient healthcare service delivery on ACS patients. Admission records, as typical media to contain clinical information of patients at the early stage of their hospitalizations, provide significant potential to be explored for MACE prediction in a proactive manner.
METHODS: We propose a hybrid approach for MACE prediction by utilizing a large volume of admission records. Firstly, both a rule-based medical language processing method and a machine learning method (i.e., Conditional Random Fields (CRFs)) are developed to extract essential patient features from unstructured admission records. After that, state-of-the-art supervised machine learning algorithms are applied to construct MACE prediction models from data.
RESULTS: We comparatively evaluate the performance of the proposed approach on a real clinical dataset consisting of 2930 ACS patient samples collected from a Chinese hospital. Our best model achieved 72% AUC in MACE prediction. In comparison of the performance between our models and two well-known ACS risk score tools, i.e., GRACE and TIMI, our learned models obtain better performances with a significant margin.
CONCLUSIONS: Experimental results reveal that our approach can obtain competitive performance in MACE prediction. The comparison of classifiers indicates the proposed approach has a competitive generality with datasets extracted by different feature extraction methods. Furthermore, our MACE prediction model obtained a significant improvement by comparison with both GRACE and TIMI. It indicates that using admission records can effectively provide MACE prediction service for ACS patients at the early stage of their hospitalizations.

Entities:  

Keywords:  MACE prediction; acute coronary syndrome; admission record; hybrid model; risk factor identification

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27649220      PMCID: PMC5036745          DOI: 10.3390/ijerph13090912

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health        ISSN: 1660-4601            Impact factor:   3.390


  28 in total

1.  Prediction modeling using EHR data: challenges, strategies, and a comparison of machine learning approaches.

Authors:  Jionglin Wu; Jason Roy; Walter F Stewart
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 2.983

2.  Assessment of the risk factors of coronary heart events based on data mining with decision trees.

Authors:  Minas A Karaolis; Joseph A Moutiris; Demetra Hadjipanayi; Constantinos S Pattichis
Journal:  IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed       Date:  2010-01-12

3.  Efficient and sparse feature selection for biomedical text classification via the elastic net: Application to ICU risk stratification from nursing notes.

Authors:  Ben J Marafino; W John Boscardin; R Adams Dudley
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2015-02-17       Impact factor: 6.317

4.  Extracting important information from Chinese Operation Notes with natural language processing methods.

Authors:  Hui Wang; Weide Zhang; Qiang Zeng; Zuofeng Li; Kaiyan Feng; Lei Liu
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2014-01-31       Impact factor: 6.317

5.  TIMI, PURSUIT, and GRACE risk scores: sustained prognostic value and interaction with revascularization in NSTE-ACS.

Authors:  Pedro de Araújo Gonçalves; Jorge Ferreira; Carlos Aguiar; Ricardo Seabra-Gomes
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2005-03-11       Impact factor: 29.983

6.  Risk stratification for in-hospital mortality in acutely decompensated heart failure: classification and regression tree analysis.

Authors:  Gregg C Fonarow; Kirkwood F Adams; William T Abraham; Clyde W Yancy; W John Boscardin
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2005-02-02       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Towards actionable risk stratification: a bilinear approach.

Authors:  Xiang Wang; Fei Wang; Jianying Hu; Robert Sorrentino
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2014-10-14       Impact factor: 6.317

8.  Predictors of outcome in patients with acute coronary syndromes without persistent ST-segment elevation. Results from an international trial of 9461 patients. The PURSUIT Investigators.

Authors:  E Boersma; K S Pieper; E W Steyerberg; R G Wilcox; W C Chang; K L Lee; K M Akkerhuis; R A Harrington; J W Deckers; P W Armstrong; A M Lincoff; R M Califf; E J Topol; M L Simoons
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2000-06-06       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 9.  Value and limitations of existing scores for the assessment of cardiovascular risk: a review for clinicians.

Authors:  Marie Therese Cooney; Alexandra L Dudina; Ian M Graham
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2009-09-29       Impact factor: 24.094

10.  General cardiovascular risk profile for use in primary care: the Framingham Heart Study.

Authors:  Ralph B D'Agostino; Ramachandran S Vasan; Michael J Pencina; Philip A Wolf; Mark Cobain; Joseph M Massaro; William B Kannel
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2008-01-22       Impact factor: 29.690

View more
  11 in total

1.  Machine learning versus traditional risk stratification methods in acute coronary syndrome: a pooled randomized clinical trial analysis.

Authors:  William J Gibson; Tarek Nafee; Ryan Travis; Megan Yee; Mathieu Kerneis; Magnus Ohman; C Michael Gibson
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 2.300

Review 2.  Making Sense of Big Textual Data for Health Care: Findings from the Section on Clinical Natural Language Processing.

Authors:  A Névéol; P Zweigenbaum
Journal:  Yearb Med Inform       Date:  2017-09-11

Review 3.  Predicting Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events in Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Scoping Review of Machine Learning Approaches.

Authors:  Sara Chopannejad; Farahnaz Sadoughi; Rafat Bagherzadeh; Sakineh Shekarchi
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2022-05-26       Impact factor: 2.762

Review 4.  Systematic review of current natural language processing methods and applications in cardiology.

Authors:  Meghan Reading Turchioe; Alexander Volodarskiy; Jyotishman Pathak; Drew N Wright; James Enlou Tcheng; David Slotwiner
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2022-05-25       Impact factor: 7.365

5.  Clinician involvement in research on machine learning-based predictive clinical decision support for the hospital setting: A scoping review.

Authors:  Jessica M Schwartz; Amanda J Moy; Sarah C Rossetti; Noémie Elhadad; Kenrick D Cato
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 4.497

6.  Machine-learned models using hematological inflammation markers in the prediction of short-term acute coronary syndrome outcomes.

Authors:  Konrad Pieszko; Jarosław Hiczkiewicz; Paweł Budzianowski; Janusz Rzeźniczak; Jan Budzianowski; Jerzy Błaszczyński; Roman Słowiński; Paweł Burchardt
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2018-12-03       Impact factor: 5.531

7.  Evidential MACE prediction of acute coronary syndrome using electronic health records.

Authors:  Danqing Hu; Wei Dong; Xudong Lu; Huilong Duan; Kunlun He; Zhengxing Huang
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2019-04-09       Impact factor: 2.796

8.  Utilizing dynamic treatment information for MACE prediction of acute coronary syndrome.

Authors:  Huilong Duan; Zhoujian Sun; Wei Dong; Zhengxing Huang
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2019-01-09       Impact factor: 2.796

Review 9.  Clinical Natural Language Processing in languages other than English: opportunities and challenges.

Authors:  Aurélie Névéol; Hercules Dalianis; Sumithra Velupillai; Guergana Savova; Pierre Zweigenbaum
Journal:  J Biomed Semantics       Date:  2018-03-30

10.  Association Patterns of Ontological Features Signify Electronic Health Records in Liver Cancer.

Authors:  Lawrence W C Chan; S C Cesar Wong; Choo Chiap Chiau; Tak-Ming Chan; Liang Tao; Jinghan Feng; Keith W H Chiu
Journal:  J Healthc Eng       Date:  2017-08-06       Impact factor: 2.682

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.