Literature DB >> 35617971

Predicting Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events in Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Scoping Review of Machine Learning Approaches.

Sara Chopannejad1, Farahnaz Sadoughi2, Rafat Bagherzadeh3, Sakineh Shekarchi2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Acute coronary syndrome is the topmost cause of death worldwide; therefore, it is necessary to predict major adverse cardiovascular events and cardiovascular deaths in patients with acute coronary syndrome to make correct and timely clinical decisions.
OBJECTIVE: The current review aimed to highlight algorithms and important predictor variables through examining those studies which used machine learning algorithms for predicting major adverse cardiovascular events in patients with acute coronary syndrome.
METHODS: To predict major adverse cardiovascular events in patients with acute coronary syndrome, the preferred reporting items for scoping reviews guidelines were used. In doing so, PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, Springer, and IEEE Xplore databases were searched for articles published between 2005 and 2021. The checklist "Quality assessment of machine learning studies" was used to assess the quality of eligible studies. The findings of the studies are presented in the form of a narrative synthesis of evidence.
RESULTS: In total, among 2,558 retrieved articles, 22 studies were qualified for analysis. Major adverse cardiovascular events and mortality were predicted in 5 and 17 studies, respectively. According to the results, 14 (63.64%) studies did not perform external validation and only used registry data. The algorithms used in this study comprised, inter alia, Regression Logistic, Random Forest, Boosting Ensemble, Non-Boosting Ensemble, Decision Trees, and Naive Bayes. Multiple studies (N = 20) achieved a high area under the ROC curve between 0.8 and 0.99 in predicting mortality and major adverse cardiovascular events. The predictor variables used in these studies were divided into demographic, clinical, and therapeutic features. However, no study reported the integration of machine learning model into clinical practice.
CONCLUSION: Machine learning algorithms rendered acceptable results to predict major adverse cardiovascular events and mortality outcomes in patients with acute coronary syndrome. However, these approaches have never been integrated into clinical practice. Further research is required to develop feasible and effective machine learning prediction models to measure their potentially important implications for optimizing the quality of care in patients with acute coronary syndrome. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35617971      PMCID: PMC9329142          DOI: 10.1055/a-1863-1589

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Clin Inform        ISSN: 1869-0327            Impact factor:   2.762


  60 in total

Review 1.  Machine learning: Trends, perspectives, and prospects.

Authors:  M I Jordan; T M Mitchell
Journal:  Science       Date:  2015-07-17       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Unsupervised Machine Learning of Topics Documented by Nurses about Hospitalized Patients Prior to a Rapid-Response Event.

Authors:  Zfania Tom Korach; Kenrick D Cato; Sarah A Collins; Min Jeoung Kang; Christopher Knaplund; Patricia C Dykes; Liqin Wang; Kumiko O Schnock; Jose P Garcia; Haomiao Jia; Frank Chang; Jessica M Schwartz; Li Zhou
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2019-12-18       Impact factor: 2.342

3.  Using Machine Learning Models to Predict In-Hospital Mortality for ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Patients.

Authors:  Xiang Li; Haifeng Liu; Jingang Yang; Guotong Xie; Meilin Xu; Yuejin Yang
Journal:  Stud Health Technol Inform       Date:  2017

4.  What is Machine Learning? A Primer for the Epidemiologist.

Authors:  Qifang Bi; Katherine E Goodman; Joshua Kaminsky; Justin Lessler
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2019-12-31       Impact factor: 4.897

5.  Risk prediction model for in-hospital mortality in women with ST-elevation myocardial infarction: A machine learning approach.

Authors:  Hend Mansoor; Islam Y Elgendy; Richard Segal; Anthony A Bavry; Jiang Bian
Journal:  Heart Lung       Date:  2017-10-06       Impact factor: 2.210

6.  An unsupervised machine learning method for discovering patient clusters based on genetic signatures.

Authors:  Christian Lopez; Scott Tucker; Tarik Salameh; Conrad Tucker
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2018-07-29       Impact factor: 6.317

Review 7.  Machine learning versus conventional clinical methods in guiding management of heart failure patients-a systematic review.

Authors:  George Bazoukis; Stavros Stavrakis; Jiandong Zhou; Sandeep Chandra Bollepalli; Gary Tse; Qingpeng Zhang; Jagmeet P Singh; Antonis A Armoundas
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2021-01       Impact factor: 4.214

8.  Comparison and improvement of the predictability and interpretability with ensemble learning models in QSPR applications.

Authors:  Chia-Hsiu Chen; Kenichi Tanaka; Masaaki Kotera; Kimito Funatsu
Journal:  J Cheminform       Date:  2020-03-30       Impact factor: 5.514

9.  Machine Learning to Predict the 1-Year Mortality Rate After Acute Anterior Myocardial Infarction in Chinese Patients.

Authors:  Yi-Ming Li; Li-Cheng Jiang; Jing-Jing He; Kai-Yu Jia; Yong Peng; Mao Chen
Journal:  Ther Clin Risk Manag       Date:  2020-01-09       Impact factor: 2.423

10.  The predictive value of lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio in the prognosis of acute coronary syndrome patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xiao-Qing Quan; Run-Chang Wang; Qing Zhang; Cun-Tai Zhang; Lei Sun
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2020-07-15       Impact factor: 2.298

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.