Objectives: To summarize recent research and present a selection of the best papers published in 2016 in the field of clinical Natural Language Processing (NLP). Method: A survey of the literature was performed by the two section editors of the IMIA Yearbook NLP section. Bibliographic databases were searched for papers with a focus on NLP efforts applied to clinical texts or aimed at a clinical outcome. Papers were automatically ranked and then manually reviewed based on titles and abstracts. A shortlist of candidate best papers was first selected by the section editors before being peer-reviewed by independent external reviewers. Results: The five clinical NLP best papers provide a contribution that ranges from emerging original foundational methods to transitioning solid established research results to a practical clinical setting. They offer a framework for abbreviation disambiguation and coreference resolution, a classification method to identify clinically useful sentences, an analysis of counseling conversations to improve support to patients with mental disorder and grounding of gradable adjectives. Conclusions: Clinical NLP continued to thrive in 2016, with an increasing number of contributions towards applications compared to fundamental methods. Fundamental work addresses increasingly complex problems such as lexical semantics, coreference resolution, and discourse analysis. Research results translate into freely available tools, mainly for English. Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart.
Objectives: To summarize recent research and present a selection of the best papers published in 2016 in the field of clinical Natural Language Processing (NLP). Method: A survey of the literature was performed by the two section editors of the IMIA Yearbook NLP section. Bibliographic databases were searched for papers with a focus on NLP efforts applied to clinical texts or aimed at a clinical outcome. Papers were automatically ranked and then manually reviewed based on titles and abstracts. A shortlist of candidate best papers was first selected by the section editors before being peer-reviewed by independent external reviewers. Results: The five clinical NLP best papers provide a contribution that ranges from emerging original foundational methods to transitioning solid established research results to a practical clinical setting. They offer a framework for abbreviation disambiguation and coreference resolution, a classification method to identify clinically useful sentences, an analysis of counseling conversations to improve support to patients with mental disorder and grounding of gradable adjectives. Conclusions: Clinical NLP continued to thrive in 2016, with an increasing number of contributions towards applications compared to fundamental methods. Fundamental work addresses increasingly complex problems such as lexical semantics, coreference resolution, and discourse analysis. Research results translate into freely available tools, mainly for English. Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart.
Authors: Todd Lingren; Vidhu Thaker; Cassandra Brady; Bahram Namjou; Stephanie Kennebeck; Jonathan Bickel; Nandan Patibandla; Yizhao Ni; Sara L Van Driest; Lixin Chen; Ashton Roach; Beth Cobb; Jacqueline Kirby; Josh Denny; Lisa Bailey-Davis; Marc S Williams; Keith Marsolo; Imre Solti; Ingrid A Holm; John Harley; Isaac S Kohane; Guergana Savova; Nancy Crimmins Journal: Appl Clin Inform Date: 2016-07-20 Impact factor: 2.342
Authors: Pedro L Teixeira; Wei-Qi Wei; Robert M Cronin; Huan Mo; Jacob P VanHouten; Robert J Carroll; Eric LaRose; Lisa A Bastarache; S Trent Rosenbloom; Todd L Edwards; Dan M Roden; Thomas A Lasko; Richard A Dart; Anne M Nikolai; Peggy L Peissig; Joshua C Denny Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2016-08-07 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Adam Yala; Regina Barzilay; Laura Salama; Molly Griffin; Grace Sollender; Aditya Bardia; Constance Lehman; Julliette M Buckley; Suzanne B Coopey; Fernanda Polubriaginof; Judy E Garber; Barbara L Smith; Michele A Gadd; Michelle C Specht; Thomas M Gudewicz; Anthony J Guidi; Alphonse Taghian; Kevin S Hughes Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2016-11-08 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: Jeremy L Warner; Mia A Levy; Michael N Neuss; Jeremy L Warner; Mia A Levy; Michael N Neuss Journal: J Oncol Pract Date: 2015-08-25 Impact factor: 3.840
Authors: Jeffrey J VanWormer; Robert H Holsman; Jordan B Petchenik; Brian J Dhuey; Matthew C Keifer Journal: Injury Date: 2015-09-28 Impact factor: 2.586
Authors: Sheng Yu; Abhishek Chakrabortty; Katherine P Liao; Tianrun Cai; Ashwin N Ananthakrishnan; Vivian S Gainer; Susanne E Churchill; Peter Szolovits; Shawn N Murphy; Isaac S Kohane; Tianxi Cai Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2017-04-01 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Jared B Hawkins; John S Brownstein; Gaurav Tuli; Tessa Runels; Katherine Broecker; Elaine O Nsoesie; David J McIver; Ronen Rozenblum; Adam Wright; Florence T Bourgeois; Felix Greaves Journal: BMJ Qual Saf Date: 2015-10-13 Impact factor: 7.035
Authors: Nithin Kolanu; A Shane Brown; Amanda Beech; Jacqueline R Center; Christopher P White Journal: Arch Osteoporos Date: 2021-01-06 Impact factor: 2.617
Authors: Huaqin Pan; Vesselina Bakalov; Lisa Cox; Michelle L Engle; Stephen W Erickson; Michael Feolo; Yuelong Guo; Wayne Huggins; Stephen Hwang; Masato Kimura; Michelle Krzyzanowski; Josh Levy; Michael Phillips; Ying Qin; David Williams; Erin M Ramos; Carol M Hamilton Journal: Sci Data Date: 2022-09-01 Impact factor: 8.501