| Literature DB >> 27649126 |
Mauro S Nogueira1, Fernando B Da Costa2, Reto Brun3,4, Marcel Kaiser5,6, Thomas J Schmidt7.
Abstract
Aldama discolor (syn.<span class="Species">Viguiera discolor) is an endemic Asteraceae from the Brazilian "Cerrado", which has not previously been investigated for its chemical constituents and biological activity. Diterpenes are common secondary metabolites found in Aldama species, some of which have been reported to present potential antiprotozoal and antimicrobial activities. In this study, the known ent-3-α-hydroxy-kaur-16-en-18-ol (1), as well as three new diterpenes, namely, ent-7-oxo-pimara-8,15-diene-18-ol (2), ent-2S,4S-2-19-epoxy-pimara-8(3),15-diene-7β-ol (3) and ent-7-oxo-pimara-8,15-diene-3β-ol (4), were isolated from the dichloromethane extract of A. discolor leaves and identified by means of MS and NMR. The compounds were assayed in vitro against Trypanosoma brucei rhodesiense, T. cruzi and Leishmania donovani, Plasmodium falciparum and also tested for cytotoxicity against mammalian cells (L6 cell line). The ent-kaurane 1 showed significant in vitro activity against both P. falciparum (IC 50 = 3.5 μ M) and L. donovani (IC 50 = 2.5 μ M) and ent-pimarane 2 against P. falciparum (IC 50 = 3.8 μ M). Both compounds returned high selectivity indices (SI >10) in comparison with L6 cells, which makes them interesting candidates for in vivo tests. In addition to the diterpenes, the sesquiterpene lactone budlein A (5), which has been reported to possess a strong anti-T. b. rhodesiense activity, was identified as major compound in the A. discolor extract and explains its high activity against this parasite (100% growth inhibition at 2 μ g/mL).Entities:
Keywords: Aldama discolor; Asteraceae; Leishmania donovani; Plasmodium falciparum; Trypanosoma brucei rhodesiense; Trypanosoma cruzi; Viguiera discolor; antiprotozoal activity; ent-kaurane; ent-pimarane
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27649126 PMCID: PMC6274167 DOI: 10.3390/molecules21091237
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
In vitro growth inhibition (%) of Aldama discolor crude extracts against T. b. rhodesiense, T. cruzi, L. donovani and P. falciparum. DCM, dichloromethane.
| Extract | Yield (%) | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 µg/mL | 10 µg/mL | 2 µg/mL | 10 µg/mL | 2 µg/mL | 10 µg/mL | 2 µg/mL | 10 µg/mL | ||
| Hex | 31.2 | 100.0 | 0.0 | 6.8 | 25.0 | 86.9 | - | 99.8 | 3.0 |
| DCM | 100.0 | 100.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 21.1 | 86.4 | 5.7 | 99.7 | 28.0 |
| EtOAc | 100.0 | 99.8 | 6.9 | 14.8 | 14.2 | 87.8 | 17.8 | 100.0 | 25.2 |
| MeOH | 100.0 | 100.0 | 0.0 | 5.4 | 34.1 | 69.0 | 45.2 | 87.4 | 9.4 |
Percentage of dried crude extract in relation to the pulverized dried plant material. All extracts were prepared with 500 mg of the plant material.
Figure 1Chemical structures of diterpenes 1–4.
C-NMR and H-NMR spectroscopic data for 1–4 (150 and 600 MHz, CDCl).
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 38.6 | 35.5 | a 1.84 ddd | 16.6, 12.8, 3.8 | 34.3 | 13, 3.5 | 36.8 | 13, 11, 3.6 | ||||
| b 1.28 ddd | 16.6, 12.8, 4.1 | 13, 4.2, 3.5 | 13, 6, 2.7 | |||||||||
| 2 | 27.9 | 13.4, 11.8, 3.6 | 18.3 | a 1.65 dt | 13.8, 3.8 | 27.4 | 13.3, 11.7, 3.5 | 81 | 11.5, 4.6, 1.3 | |||
| 13.4, 8, 4.4 | b 1.71 dt | 13.8, 3.5 | 13.3, 3.9 | |||||||||
| 3 | 81.1 | 3.42 ddd | 11.8, 4.4, 1.3 | 34.6 | a 1.33 ddt | 12.8, 3.8, 1.3 | 78.1 | 3.29 dd | 11.7, 4.4 | 28.1 | a 1.74 m | |
| b 1.52 ddd | 13.8, 12.8, 4.2 | b 1.78 ddd | 13.2, 3.6, 1.8 | |||||||||
| 4 | 43.1 | 37.7 | 38.9 | 42.4 | ||||||||
| 5 | 55.9 | 0.87 ddd | 11.8, 6, 1.7 | 43.2 | 2.08 dd | 13.4, 4.5 | 49.1 | 1.69 dd | 11.7, 3.9 | 47.5 | 1.71 m | |
| 6 | 20.2 | 16, 11.8, 3.8 | 35.3 | 35.1 | 17.7, 11.7 | 28.9 | ||||||
| 17.7,3.9 | 13.9, 3.8 | |||||||||||
| 7 | 41.5 | 199.8 | 199.8 | 72.8 | 6.8, 3.8 | |||||||
| 175.2 | 176.2 | |||||||||||
| 8 | 44.1 | 129.1 | 129.5 | 140.1 | ||||||||
| 9 | 56 | 1.03 d | 6.9 | 165.8 | 164.7 | 46.7 | 2.05 ddd | 10.2, 6.4, 2.1 | ||||
| 10 | 38.9 | 39.5 | 39.5 | 38.1 | ||||||||
| 11 | 18.5 | 22.8 | 22.8 | 18.9 | ||||||||
| 13.4, 6.9, 3.6 | ||||||||||||
| 12 | 39.7 | 11.5 | 33.1 | 33 | 35.4 | |||||||
| 11.5, 5, 1.8 | ||||||||||||
| 13 | 44 | 2.64 t | 5 | 34.3 | 34.2 | 38.8 | ||||||
| 14 | 33.2 | pax 1.47 m | 33.6 | 17, 2.3 | 33.6 | 17, 2 | 133.9 | 5.47 t | 1.7 | |||
| peq 1.63 m | 17, 2.3 | 17, 1.4 | ||||||||||
| 15 | 49 | 2.05 t | 2.5 | 147.4 | 5.75 dd | 17.7, 10.6 | 147.2 | 5.74 dd | 17.2, 10.7 | 146.5 | 5.68 dd | 17.3, 10.4 |
| 16 | 155.7 | 110.8 | 4.89 dd | 17.7, 1 | 110.9 | 4.88 dd | 17.2, 1.4 | 113.5 | 4.82 dd | 17.3, 1.7 | ||
| 4.91 dd | 10.6, 1 | 4.9 | 10.7, 1.4 | 4.97 dd | 10.4, 1.7 | |||||||
| 17 | 103.3 | 4.73 ddt | 2.5, 1.8, 1.3 | 24.8 | 0.95 s | 24.8 | 0.94 s | 29.2 | 1.02 s | |||
| 4.79 m | 119 | 119 | ||||||||||
| 18 | 22.8 | 1.22 s | 70.9 | a 3.13 d | 10.9 | 27.5 | 1.0 s | 22.4 | 1.27 s | |||
| b 3.41 d | 10.9 | |||||||||||
| 19 | 64.5 | a 4.20 d | 11.2 | 17.5 | 0.87 s | 15.3 | 0.89 s | 64.4 | a 4.25 d | 11.1 | ||
| b 3.31 dd | 11.2, 1.3 | b 3.34 dd | 11.1, 1.5 | |||||||||
| 20 | 18.3 | 0.98 s | 18.8 | 1.10 s | 18.3 | 1.06 s | 15.2 | 0.65 s | ||||
Assignments of the proton shifts were compared with those described by Lloyd et al. [29] and Dutra et al. [30].
Figure 23D-structures of the most energetically-favorable conformers for the ent-pimaranes 2–4 obtained after a low mode molecular dynamics (LMD) conformation search. Distances (≤3.0 Å) between the protons in the molecular model were in agreement with the experimental NOE effects, as shown by the NOESY correlations (dashed arrows). HMBC key correlations are also shown (blue arrows).
Figure 3(A) Time-dependent density functional (TDDFT) calculated CD spectra for Compound 3 as a normal pimarane (blue, dashed) and ent-pimarane (red) in comparison with the experimental spectrum of the isolated compound (black); (B) comparison of CD spectra of Compounds 1 (blue) and 3 (red). Both compounds show essentially the same Cotton effects, so that they belong to the same series of diterpenes; (C) Correlation between the Cotton effect sign of a model enone in heptane that corresponds to the same absolute configuration as that observed in Compounds 1 and 3 (adapted from Lightner et al. [32]).
IC (geometric mean of 2 experiments ±SE) of the isolated compounds (M) tested against T. b. rhodesiense, T. cruzi, L. donovani, P. falciparum and L6 cells. The selectivity index (SI) determined with L6 cells is also shown.
| Comp. | SI | SI | SI | SI | L6 Cells | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 20.1 ± 0.5 | 2 | 55.6 | 1 | 2.5 ± 1.5 | 16 | 3.5 ± 0.2 | 11 | 40.2 ± 5.5 | |
| 24.3 | 2 | 15.4 | 3 | 18.2 | 3 | 3.8 | 13 | 48.3 ± 5.9 | |
| NA | 19.4 | 4 | 13.8 | 5 | 16.5 ± 4.9 | 4 | 69.3 ± 10.9 | ||
| 47.3 ± 4.1 | 2 | 58.9 | 2 | 21.9 | 5 | 16.1 ± 6.1 | 6 | 101.0 ± 45.7 | |
| 0.025 ± 0.0005 | 0.653 ± 0.135 | 0.049 ± 0.001 | 0.003 ± 0.001 | 0.008 + 0.001 |
T. b. rhodesiense (STIB 900 strain, trypomastigotes, pos.control: melarsoprol); T. cruzi (Tulahuen C4 strain, amastigotes, pos. control: benznidazole); L. donovani (MHOM-ET-67/L82 strain, amastigotes, pos. control: miltefosine); P. falciparum (NF54 strain, intra-erythrocytic stages, pos. control: chloroquine), cytotoxicity (L6-cell-line from rat-skeletal myoblasts, pos. control: podophyllotoxin); only one experiment was carried out to obtain the IC; NA: not assayed due to the indication of a lack of activity in a prediction study (unpublished data).