| Literature DB >> 21233793 |
Tatiane C Carvalho1, Marília R Simão, Sérgio R Ambrósio, Niege A J C Furtado, Rodrigo C S Veneziani, Vladimir C G Heleno, Fernando B Da Costa, Brenda P F A Gomes, Maria Gorete M Souza, Erika Borges dos Reis, Carlos H G Martins.
Abstract
Six pimarane-type diterpenes isolated from Viguiera arenaria Baker and two semi-synthetic derivatives were evaluated in vitro against a panel of representative microorganisms responsible for dental root canal infections. The microdilution method was used for the determination of the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC) against Porphyromonas gingivalis, Prevotella nigrescens, Prevotella intermedia, Prevotella buccae, Fusobacterium nucleatum, Bacteroides fragilis, Actinomyces naeslundii, Actinomyces viscosus, Peptostreptococcus micros, Enterococcus faecalis and Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans. The compounds ent-pimara-8(14),15-dien-19-oic acid, its sodium salt and ent-8(14),15-pimaradien-3β-ol were the most active, displaying MIC values ranging from 1 to 10 μg mL-1. The results also allow us to conclude that minor structural differences among these diterpenes significantly influence their antimicrobial activity, bringing new perspectives to the discovery of new chemicals for use as a complement to instrumental endodontic procedures.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2011 PMID: 21233793 PMCID: PMC6259102 DOI: 10.3390/molecules160100543
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Figure 1Chemical structures of the diterpenes evaluated in the present work.
In vitro antibacterial activity (MIC) of the pimarane-type diterpenes against endodontic pathogens.
| Microorganism (ATCC) | Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (μg mL-1) | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | Chlor | |
| * | 1.25 | 10.0 | 40.0 | 1.0 | 0.92 | ||||
| * | 2.0 | 10.0 | * | * | * | 60.0 | 1.25 | 1.85 | |
| * | 2.0 | 10.0 | 50.0 | 60.0 | 60.0 | 40.0 | 1.5 | 0.92 | |
| * | 1.0 | 7.5 | 50.0 | 40.0 | 60.0 | 20.0 | 1.75 | 0.92 | |
| * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | 1.85 | |
| * | 4.0 | 4.0 | 4.0 | 1.5 | 2.25 | 1.75 | 2.25 | 0.92 | |
| * | 2.0 | 2.5 | 40.0 | 40.0 | 18.0 | 16.0 | 10.0 | 7.38 | |
| * | 1.25 | 5.0 | 12.0 | 60.0 | 60.0 | 40.0 | 5.0 | 1.85 | |
| * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | 1.85 | |
| * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | 3.69 | |
| * | 0.5 | 6.0 | 16.0 | 8.0 | 1.85 | ||||
| * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | 3.69 | |
| * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | 7.38 | |
| * | 4.0 | 10.0 | * | 40.0 | 40.0 | * | 1.25 | 7.38 | |
* Inactive in the evaluated concentrations (MIC values higher than 80.0 μg mL-1); Chlorhexidine (Chlor)- positive control.
Minimum bactericidal concentration for the compounds 2, 3 and 8 against endodontic pathogens.
| Microorganisms (ATCC) | Minimum Bactericidal Concentration (μg mL-1) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | 3 | 8 | Chlor | |
| 10.0 | 10.0 | 8.0 | 0.92 | |
| 10.0 | 40.0 | 8.0 | 1.85 | |
| 2.0 | 40.0 | 1.75 | 0.92 | |
| 1.0 | 40.0 | 2.0 | 0.92 | |
| 4.0 | 14.0 | 5.0 | 0.92 | |
| 2.0 | 2.5 | 14.0 | 7.38 | |
| 10.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 | 1.85 | |
| 1.0 | 6.0 | 12.0 | 1.85 | |
| 4.0 | 60.0 | 1.75 | 7.38 | |
Chlorhexidine (Chlor) - positive control; DMSO 5% water solution (negative control) did not affect the growth of the microorganisms.
Figure 2Chemical structure of kaurenoic acid (KA) and its respective methyl ester (KA-Me).