Literature DB >> 27647897

BMI1-UBR5 axis regulates transcriptional repression at damaged chromatin.

Anthony Sanchez1, Angelo De Vivo1, Nadima Uprety2, Jonghwan Kim2, Stanley M Stevens1, Younghoon Kee3.   

Abstract

BMI1 is a component of the Polycomb Repressive Complex 1 (PRC1), which plays a key role in maintaining epigenetic silencing during development. BMI1 also participates in gene silencing during DNA damage response, but the precise downstream function of BMI1 in gene silencing is unclear. Here we identified the UBR5 E3 ligase as a downstream factor of BMI1. We found that UBR5 forms damage-inducible nuclear foci in a manner dependent on the PRC1 components BMI1, RNF1 (RING1a), and RNF2 (RING1b). Whereas transcription is repressed at UV-induced lesions on chromatin, depletion of the PRC1 members or UBR5 alone derepressed transcription elongation at these sites, suggesting that UBR5 functions in a linear pathway with PRC1 in inducing gene silencing at lesions. Mass spectrometry (MS) analysis revealed that UBR5 associates with BMI1 as well as FACT components SPT16 and SSRP1. We found that UBR5 localizes to the UV-induced lesions along with SPT16. We show that UBR5 ubiquitinates SPT16, and depletion of UBR5 or BMI1 leads to an enlargement of SPT16 foci size at UV lesions, suggesting that UBR5 and BMI1 repress SPT16 enrichment at the damaged sites. Consistently, depletion of the FACT components effectively reversed the transcriptional derepression incurred in the UBR5 and BMI1 KO cells. Finally, UBR5 and BMI1 KO cells are hypersensitive to UV, which supports the notion that faulty RNA synthesis at damaged sites is harmful to the cell fitness. Altogether, these results suggest that BMI1 and UBR5 repress the polymerase II (Pol II)-mediated transcription at damaged sites, by negatively regulating the FACT-dependent Pol II elongation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  BMI1; FACT; Polycomb; UBR5; transcription

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27647897      PMCID: PMC5056041          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1610735113

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  42 in total

Review 1.  Polycomb silencers control cell fate, development and cancer.

Authors:  Anke Sparmann; Maarten van Lohuizen
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 60.716

2.  The histone chaperone facilitates chromatin transcription (FACT) protein maintains normal replication fork rates.

Authors:  Takuya Abe; Kazuto Sugimura; Yoshifumi Hosono; Yasunari Takami; Motomu Akita; Akari Yoshimura; Shusuke Tada; Tatsuo Nakayama; Hiromu Murofushi; Katsuzumi Okumura; Shunichi Takeda; Masami Horikoshi; Masayuki Seki; Takemi Enomoto
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2011-07-07       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 3.  Transcriptional regulation by Polycomb group proteins.

Authors:  Luciano Di Croce; Kristian Helin
Journal:  Nat Struct Mol Biol       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 15.369

4.  A functional genomic approach reveals the transcriptional role of EDD in the expression and function of angiogenesis regulator ACVRL1.

Authors:  Hui-Wen Chen; Chang-Ching Yang; Chia-Ling Hsieh; Hsuan Liu; Sheng-Chung Lee; Bertrand Chin-Ming Tan
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2013-11-02

5.  EDD induces cell cycle arrest by increasing p53 levels.

Authors:  Veronique A J Smits
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2012-02-15       Impact factor: 4.534

6.  Quantitative Proteomic Atlas of Ubiquitination and Acetylation in the DNA Damage Response.

Authors:  Andrew E H Elia; Alexander P Boardman; David C Wang; Edward L Huttlin; Robert A Everley; Noah Dephoure; Chunshui Zhou; Itay Koren; Steven P Gygi; Stephen J Elledge
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2015-06-04       Impact factor: 17.970

7.  Mammalian hyperplastic discs homolog EDD regulates miRNA-mediated gene silencing.

Authors:  Hong Su; Shuxia Meng; Yanyan Lu; Melanie I Trombly; Jian Chen; Chengyi Lin; Anita Turk; Xiaozhong Wang
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2011-07-08       Impact factor: 17.970

8.  Acetylation regulates gluconeogenesis by promoting PEPCK1 degradation via recruiting the UBR5 ubiquitin ligase.

Authors:  Wenqing Jiang; Shiwen Wang; Mengtao Xiao; Yan Lin; Lisha Zhou; Qunying Lei; Yue Xiong; Kun-Liang Guan; Shimin Zhao
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2011-07-08       Impact factor: 17.970

9.  BMI1 confers radioresistance to normal and cancerous neural stem cells through recruitment of the DNA damage response machinery.

Authors:  Sabrina Facchino; Mohamed Abdouh; Wassim Chatoo; Gilbert Bernier
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-07-28       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Histone H1 couples initiation and amplification of ubiquitin signalling after DNA damage.

Authors:  Tina Thorslund; Anita Ripplinger; Saskia Hoffmann; Thomas Wild; Michael Uckelmann; Bine Villumsen; Takeo Narita; Titia K Sixma; Chunaram Choudhary; Simon Bekker-Jensen; Niels Mailand
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2015-10-21       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  22 in total

Review 1.  Preserving genome integrity and function: the DNA damage response and histone modifications.

Authors:  Jae Jin Kim; Seo Yun Lee; Kyle M Miller
Journal:  Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol       Date:  2019-06-04       Impact factor: 8.250

2.  Putting the brakes on transcription at damaged chromatin: Do Polycomb silencers do more than modify histones?

Authors:  Younghoon Kee
Journal:  Mol Cell Oncol       Date:  2016-10-14

3.  PARP1-dependent recruitment of the FBXL10-RNF68-RNF2 ubiquitin ligase to sites of DNA damage controls H2A.Z loading.

Authors:  Gergely Rona; Domenico Roberti; Yandong Yin; Julia K Pagan; Harrison Homer; Elizabeth Sassani; Andras Zeke; Luca Busino; Eli Rothenberg; Michele Pagano
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2018-07-09       Impact factor: 8.140

Review 4.  Structure and function of the histone chaperone FACT - Resolving FACTual issues.

Authors:  Katerina Gurova; Han-Wen Chang; Maria E Valieva; Poorva Sandlesh; Vasily M Studitsky
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta Gene Regul Mech       Date:  2018-07-25       Impact factor: 4.490

Review 5.  Non-canonical DNA/RNA structures during Transcription-Coupled Double-Strand Break Repair: Roadblocks or Bona fide repair intermediates?

Authors:  Nadine Puget; Kyle M Miller; Gaëlle Legube
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2019-07-08

Review 6.  Transcriptional regulation and chromatin dynamics at DNA double-strand breaks.

Authors:  Sunwoo Min; Jae-Hoon Ji; Yungyeong Heo; Hyeseong Cho
Journal:  Exp Mol Med       Date:  2022-10-13       Impact factor: 12.153

7.  Enhancing chemotherapy sensitivity by targeting PcG via the ATM/p53 pathway.

Authors:  Shu-Bin Gao; Kang-Li Li; Huan Qiu; Ling-Yu Zhu; Chang-Bao Pan; Yue Zhao; Shu-Hua Wei; Shu Shi; Guang-Hui Jin; Li-Xiang Xue
Journal:  Am J Cancer Res       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 6.166

Review 8.  R-loops as Janus-faced modulators of DNA repair.

Authors:  Aline Marnef; Gaëlle Legube
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  2021-04-09       Impact factor: 28.824

Review 9.  Regulation of chromatin structure and function: insights into the histone chaperone FACT.

Authors:  Peijun Wang; Wanting Yang; Shuxin Zhao; Buhe Nashun
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2021-02-16       Impact factor: 4.534

10.  UBR5 targets tumor suppressor CDC73 proteolytically to promote aggressive breast cancer.

Authors:  Gang Xiang; Shuxuan Wang; Ling Chen; Mei Song; Xiaoxu Song; Huan Wang; Pengbo Zhou; Xiaojing Ma; Jing Yu
Journal:  Cell Death Dis       Date:  2022-05-12       Impact factor: 9.685

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.