Literature DB >> 2764656

Evaluation of the do not resuscitate orders at a community hospital.

C J Stolman1, J J Gregory, D Dunn, B Ripley.   

Abstract

Demographic, medical, and outcome characteristics for 821 do not resuscitate (DNR) patients were compared with 300 age- and sex-matched control patients, and with 230 patients for whom cardiopulmonary resuscitation had been performed. Do not resuscitate patients were more likely to be female and older than cardiopulmonary resuscitation patients and to have a child as next of kin. Although DNR patients in intensive care units had comparable illness levels before and at the time of the order, treatment levels were reduced when the order was written. In general, DNR patients received more nursing care than other patients. Hospital mortality was 59.8% for DNR, 83.9% for CPR, and 1.7% for control patients. We identified diagnosis, prior activity, hospital unit, and employment status as predictors of DNR. According to documentation, 20% of patients participated in the DNR decision. Introduction of a DNR progress note form significantly improved documentation of the DNR process, but further efforts to improve DNR practice and patient participation are recommended.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Death and Euthanasia; Empirical Approach; Overlook Hospital (Summit, NJ)

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2764656

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-9926


  12 in total

1.  Evaluation of do not resuscitate orders (DNR) in a Swiss community hospital.

Authors:  N Junod Perron; A Morabia; A De Torrenté
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 2.903

2.  We meant no harm, yet we made a mistake; why not apologize for it? A student's view.

Authors:  Dominic E Sanford; David A Fleming
Journal:  HEC Forum       Date:  2010-06

3.  Do not resuscitate policies of New Jersey hospitals.

Authors:  C J Stolman; J J Gregory; D Dunn
Journal:  HEC Forum       Date:  1991

4.  The 'no code' tattoo--an ethical dilemma.

Authors:  K V Iserson
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1992-03

5.  Timing of do-not-resuscitate orders for hospitalized older adults who require a surrogate decision-maker.

Authors:  Alexia M Torke; Greg A Sachs; Paul R Helft; Sandra Petronio; Christianna Purnell; Siu Hui; Christopher M Callahan
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2011-07-07       Impact factor: 5.562

6.  Variation in decisions to forgo life-sustaining therapies in US ICUs.

Authors:  Caroline M Quill; Sarah J Ratcliffe; Michael O Harhay; Scott D Halpern
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 9.410

7.  Deciding not to resuscitate in Dutch hospitals.

Authors:  J J van Delden; P J van der Maas; L Pijnenborg; C W Looman
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 2.903

8.  Advance directives: the views of health care professionals.

Authors:  M Kelner; I L Bourgeault; P C Hébert; E V Dunn
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1993-04-15       Impact factor: 8.262

9.  Evaluation of end of life care in cancer patients at a teaching hospital in Japan.

Authors:  Y Tokuda; N Nakazato; K Tamaki
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 2.903

10.  Patient acceptance of an information sheet about cardiopulmonary resuscitation options.

Authors:  R A Gates; M J Weaver; R H Gates
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 5.128

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.