Literature DB >> 8308873

Deciding not to resuscitate in Dutch hospitals.

J J van Delden1, P J van der Maas, L Pijnenborg, C W Looman.   

Abstract

The use of do not resuscitate (DNR) orders in Dutch hospitals was studied as part of a nationwide study on medical decisions concerning the end of life. DNR decisions are made in 6 per cent of all admissions, and 61 per cent of all in-hospital deaths were preceded by a DNR decision. We found that in only 14 per cent of the cases had the patients been involved in the DNR decision (32 per cent of competent patients). The concept of futility is analysed as these findings are discussed. We conclude that determining the effectiveness of resuscitation is a medical judgement whereas determining the proportionality (burden/benefit ratio) of it requires a discussion between doctor and patient (or his or her surrogates). Since the respondents in the cases without patient involvement gave many reasons for their decision that went beyond determining effectiveness, we conclude that more patient involvement would have been desirable.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Central Bureau of Statistics (Netherlands); Death and Euthanasia; Empirical Approach

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8308873      PMCID: PMC1376338          DOI: 10.1136/jme.19.4.200

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Ethics        ISSN: 0306-6800            Impact factor:   2.903


  15 in total

1.  Resuscitation policies--action required.

Authors:  R Gillon
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 2.903

2.  Do-not-resuscitate orders in Swedish medical wards.

Authors:  K Asplund; M Britton
Journal:  J Intern Med       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 8.989

3.  Epidemiology of no-code orders in an academic hospital.

Authors:  R F Uhlmann; W J McDonald; T S Inui
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1984-01

4.  Do-not-resuscitate orders in a county hospital.

Authors:  M R Levy; M E Lambe; C L Shear
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1984-01

5.  'Do not resuscitate' decisions. A prospective study at three teaching hospitals.

Authors:  B Lo; G Saika; W Strull; E Thomas; J Showstack
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1985-06

Review 6.  Medical futility: its meaning and ethical implications.

Authors:  L J Schneiderman; N S Jecker; A R Jonsen
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1990-06-15       Impact factor: 25.391

7.  The do-not-resuscitate order in teaching hospitals.

Authors:  A L Evans; B A Brody
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1985-04-19       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Survey of "do not resuscitate" orders in a district general hospital.

Authors:  E J Aarons; N J Beeching
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1991-12-14

9.  The do-not-resuscitate order. Still too little too late.

Authors:  K Gleeson; S Wise
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1990-05

10.  The values history. The evaluation of the patient's values and advance directives.

Authors:  D J Doukas; L B McCullough
Journal:  J Fam Pract       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 0.493

View more
  5 in total

1.  Not if, but how: one way to talk with patients about forgoing life support.

Authors:  R Löfmark; T Nilstun
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 2.401

2.  What is the role of empirical research in bioethical reflection and decision-making? An ethical analysis.

Authors:  Pascal Borry; Paul Schotsmans; Kris Dierickx
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2004

3.  Discussions of "code status" on a family practice teaching ward: what barriers do family physicians face?

Authors:  B Calam; S Far; R Andrew
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2000-11-14       Impact factor: 8.262

4.  The impact of regional culture on intensive care end of life decision making: an Israeli perspective from the ETHICUS study.

Authors:  F D Ganz; J Benbenishty; M Hersch; A Fischer; G Gurman; C L Sprung
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 2.903

Review 5.  Increasing use of DNR orders in the elderly worldwide: whose choice is it?

Authors:  E P Cherniack
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 2.903

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.