R A Gates1, M J Weaver, R H Gates. 1. Department of Nursing, Fitzsimons Army Medical Center, Aurora, CO 80045-5001.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine initial patient acceptance of a cardiopulmonary resuscitation/do-not-resuscitate orders (CPR/DNR) information sheet intended to facilitate early discussion of CPR preferences. DESIGN: Attitudinal survey of adults after reading a CPR/DNR information sheet. SETTING: Inpatient wards and outpatient clinics of a tertiary care military teaching hospital. PATIENTS: 230 English-reading, mentally competent, volunteer patients (95%) of 243 eligible patients completed questionnaires. Mean age was 51.5 +/- 17 years; 122 (53%) patients were men; 103 (45%) were inpatients. Self-reported diagnoses were: cancer, 42 (18%); HIV disease, 22 (10%); other medical conditions, 87 (38%); pre- and postoperative cases, 35 (15%); and unknown, 44 (19%). RESULTS: 56% of the patients had previously thought about CPR options. 10% of the patients had actually discussed preferences with their physicians. 90% of the patients desired discussion with their physicians and other health care providers. 91% of the patients reported feeling better or no change after reading the information. 78% of the patients agreed that the information sheet would be helpful in discussing their preferences and most thought the information should be routinely given to all patients. CONCLUSIONS: Written information about CPR options was perceived as helpful and acceptable to most patients surveyed. Since a few patients initially reported feeling worse after reading the CPR/DNR information sheet, written information should not be used alone but may facilitate initial communication and discussion.
OBJECTIVE: To determine initial patient acceptance of a cardiopulmonary resuscitation/do-not-resuscitate orders (CPR/DNR) information sheet intended to facilitate early discussion of CPR preferences. DESIGN: Attitudinal survey of adults after reading a CPR/DNR information sheet. SETTING: Inpatient wards and outpatient clinics of a tertiary care military teaching hospital. PATIENTS: 230 English-reading, mentally competent, volunteer patients (95%) of 243 eligible patients completed questionnaires. Mean age was 51.5 +/- 17 years; 122 (53%) patients were men; 103 (45%) were inpatients. Self-reported diagnoses were: cancer, 42 (18%); HIV disease, 22 (10%); other medical conditions, 87 (38%); pre- and postoperative cases, 35 (15%); and unknown, 44 (19%). RESULTS: 56% of the patients had previously thought about CPR options. 10% of the patients had actually discussed preferences with their physicians. 90% of the patients desired discussion with their physicians and other health care providers. 91% of the patients reported feeling better or no change after reading the information. 78% of the patients agreed that the information sheet would be helpful in discussing their preferences and most thought the information should be routinely given to all patients. CONCLUSIONS: Written information about CPR options was perceived as helpful and acceptable to most patients surveyed. Since a few patients initially reported feeling worse after reading the CPR/DNR information sheet, written information should not be used alone but may facilitate initial communication and discussion.
Entities:
Keywords:
Death and Euthanasia; Empirical Approach; Fitzsimons Army Medical Center
Authors: Michael E Wilson; Abbasali Akhoundi; Artur K Krupa; Richard F Hinds; John M Litell; Ognjen Gajic; Kianoush Kashani Journal: BMC Anesthesiol Date: 2014-03-08 Impact factor: 2.217