Literature DB >> 27644848

Personal indium exposure concentration in respirable dusts and serum indium level.

Satoko Iwasawa1, Makiko Nakano, Hiroyuki Miyauchi, Shigeru Tanaka, Yaeko Kawasumi, Ichiro Higashikubo, Akiyo Tanaka, Miyuki Hirata, Kazuyuki Omae.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to assess the relationship between indium exposure concentration in the respirable dust fraction (In-E) and indium in serum (In-S) in workers.
METHODS: A total of 39 workers were studied. The study subjects were categorized into 3 groups, namely, smelting workers (n=7), ITO workers (n=6) in an ITO grinding plant, and other workers (n=26). In-E and In-S ranged from 0.004-24.0 μg/m3 and 0.1-8.50 μg/L, respectively. The simple regression equation was log(In-S)=0.322×log(In-E)-0.443. The simple correlation coefficients for the smelting workers, ITO workers and other workers were 0.489, 0.812 and 0.163, respectively. The differences in the relationships among the three groups suggest that In-S may vary with the chemical form to which the workers were exposed. In-E and In-S seem to be positively correlated. The correlation coefficient was higher for both smelting and ITO workers than for other workers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27644848      PMCID: PMC5285317          DOI: 10.2486/indhealth.2016-0015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ind Health        ISSN: 0019-8366            Impact factor:   2.179


Recent epidemiological studies in Japan revealed that the inhalation of hardly soluble indium compounds causes interstitial and emphysematous lung diseases1, 2, 3, 4). Based on the dose-effect and dose-response relationships between indium in serum (In-S) and Krebs von den Lungen-6 (KL-6), the Japan Society for Occupational Health (JSOH) recommended an occupational exposure limit based on the biological monitoring (OEL-B) of indium of 3 μg/L of In-S in 2007. However, no information is available regarding the relationships between indium exposure and its biological exposure or effect indices. In 2013 and 2014, we performed cross-sectional studies in 10 indium metal processing plants and 1 indium-tin oxide target plate (ITO) grinding plant where the external and internal exposure indices of indium were expected to be correlated, and measured the 8-hour time-weighted average (8h-TWA) exposure concentrations of indium in the respirable dust fraction (In-E, μg/m3) and of indium in serum (In-S, μg/L). The aim of this study was to assess the relationship between In-E and In-S. This study was approved by the Ethical Committee, School of Medicine, Keio University (approval number 20110268), and written informed consent was obtained from all study subjects. In the 10 indium metal processing plants, the In-E was measured in the study of work-environment assessment conducted by the Japan Industrial Safety and Health Association and commissioned by the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare. In the ITO grinding plant, our research team measured the In-E. The respirable fraction of dust in the breathing zone was collected using a respirable dust cyclone (GS-3, SKC Inc) at a flow rate of 2.75 L/min or a TR sampler (PM4 NWPS-254, Sibata Scientific Technology Ltd.) coupled with a minipump (MP-Σ3, Sibata Scientific Technology Ltd.) at a flow rate of 2 L/min. Because sampling times ranged from 251 to 483 min, we converted the concentration to a conventional 8h-TWA. In-E was measured using inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) at the Kyushu University Center of Advanced Instrumental Analysis2) or at the Japan Industrial Safety and Health Association2, 5, 6). All In-S values were measured by our research team using ICP-MS at the Kyushu University Center of Advanced Instrumental Analysis2). Detection limit of In-S was 0.1 μg/L. The number of currently indium-exposed workers in whom both In-E and In-S were measured was 64. Among the 64 workers, 23 were excluded from the analysis because their In-S levels were less than the detection limit (<0.1 μg/L). These 23 workers were categorized dental technicians (n=9), workers of bonding (n=1), solder manufacturing (n=10) and other indium metal processing (n=3). One worker with an occupational history of ITO manufacturing from several years prior and one worker with practically no exposure as of the sampling day (In-E: 0.00002 μg/m3) were also excluded. Ultimately, the study subjects included 39 workers. The study subjects were categorized into three occupational groups, namely, ITO grinding workers (n=6, ITO workers), workers in indium alloy smelting plants using high-temperature furnaces (≥1000°C) (n=7, smelting workers), and dental technicians and workers of bonding, solder manufacturing and other indium metal processing (n=26, other workers).

Statistical analysis

To compare In-S and In-E among the three groups, the values were log-normally transformed to an approximately normal distribution before analysis, the geometric means (GM) and the geometric standard deviations (GSD) were calculated, and the Steel rank sum test was applied. A single regression model and a single correlation analysis were used to evaluate the relationship between In-E and In-S. Statistical significance was assessed with p<0.05. All statistical analyses were performed using JMP version 11.0.0 (SAS Institute). The mean age of the subjects was 38.5 years (range 20–63), 87.5% were male, and 47.5% were current smokers. The mean duration of indium exposure was 8.2 years (range 0.7–34.7). In-E ranged from 0.004 to 24.0 μg/m3, and In-S ranged from 0.1 to 8.5 μg/L. The GM (GSD) of In-E was 0.97 (8.68) in the smelting workers, 1.22 (2.19) in the ITO workers and, 0.10 (6.49) in the other workers, respectively. The In-E values of the smelting workers and the ITO workers were marginally (p=0.0709) and significantly (p=0.0069) higher than the In-E values of the other workers. The GM (GSD) of In-S was 0.93 (4.50) in the smelting workers, 0.58 (3.26) in the ITO workers, and 0.12 (1.62) in the other workers, respectively. The In-S values of the smelting workers and the ITO workers were significantly (p=0.011 and 0.022, respectively) higher than those of the other workers. Figure 1a shows a scattergram of log(In-E) and log(In-S). The simple regression equation was log(In-S)=0.322×log(In-E)−0.443, the regression coefficient was statistically significant (p=0.0002), and the simple correlation coefficient was 0.555 (95%CI 0.290–0.741).
Fig. 1.

Scattergram of log(In-E) and log(In-S) classified by job types.

The x-axis represents log(In-E) and the y-axis represents log(In-S).

r: simple correlation coefficient. *: p<0.05.

Scattergram of log(In-E) and log(In-S) classified by job types. The x-axis represents log(In-E) and the y-axis represents log(In-S). r: simple correlation coefficient. *: p<0.05. Because the distribution of the In-E and In-S values was different among the three groups, scattergrams were displayed for each group (Figs. 1b, 1c, 1d). The simple correlation coefficients were 0.489 (95%CI −0.417–0.908) in the smelting workers (Fig. 1b), 0.812 (0.002–0.979) in the ITO workers (Fig. 1c), and 0.163 (−0.240–0.518) in the other workers (Fig. 1d). Due to the small number of subjects, the distributions of the In-E and In-S values in the smelting and ITO workers were not statistically significant, but they seemed to be linear (Fig. 1b, 1c). As far as we know, this is the first paper concerning the relationship between In-E and In-S. Our research team has been interested in the relationship between In-E and In-S for a long time. However, we believed that it would be difficult to clarify this relationship because we believed that In-S may strongly reflect the amount of indium load in the lungs and, thus, the current In-S would not correlate to the current In-E. The reasons are supposed as follows: (1) due to the hardly soluble characteristics of indium compounds, the clearance rate of accumulated indium compounds in the lungs is very small7); (2) the In-S levels of formerly indium-exposed workers do not readily decrease4) and the biological half-life of In-S in formerly exposed workers who perfectly removed from indium exposure is around 8 years8); and (3) many indium processing plants have instituted labor hygiene management systems, and In-E and indium inhalation concentration may not be parallel due to the wearing of effective protective devices6). In this study, we had a chance to measure In-S and In-E in 11 plants that had not yet taken action to improve the work environment. Workers in these plants wore no or ineffective respiratory protective devices, and the In-E levels were expected to be low, so the indium load in the lungs of the workers could be expected to be small. However, it should be noted that extrapolation of this study’s results to other indium-exposed populations requires careful consideration of whether the indium lung load in the population is actually negligible and whether the population wears appropriate respiratory protective devices. After the log transformation of In-S and In-E, a significant positive correlation was observed (Fig. 1a). This suggests that In-S may increase In-E-concentration-dependently in the workers in this study. Figures 1b, 1c and 1d seem to suggest that the relationship between In-E and In-S may vary due to the chemical form of the indium compounds. ITO, indium trioxide, indium metal, or indium alloy was the major chemical form in the ITO workers, the smelting workers9), and the other workers. Though the number of workers was very small, In-E was correlated to In-S in the ITO workers and in the smelting workers, but not in the other workers. We have no information about the difference in the kinetics of each chemical form in the lung, but indium metal or indium alloy may show different kinetics unlike ITO or indium trioxide. This study has some limitations. First, the number of study subjects was not sufficiently large, and information of relatively high In-E levels was lacking. This may make it difficult to smoothly interpret the results, and indicates a need to expand the study. Secondary, day-to-day variations of In-S are considered to be negligible, but day-to-day variations of In-E cannot be ignored. We may need to measure In-E on multiple days. In conclusion, In-E and In-S seem to be positively correlated, but more data are needed to draw final conclusions. Studies of the kinetics in the lungs of each indium chemical form are also necessary to elucidate the relationship between In-E and In-S.

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by Grants-in-aid for Scientific Research (Project No. 24590758 and 26860443) from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan (2012-13 and 2014-2015).

Conflict of Interest

None of the authors has any conflict of interest to disclose.
  8 in total

1.  Assessment of workplace air concentrations of indium dust in an indium-recycling plant.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Miyauchi; Aoi Minozoe; Shigeru Tanaka; Akiyo Tanaka; Miyuki Hirata; Masahiro Nakaza; Heihachiro Arito; Yoko Eitaki; Makiko Nakano; Kazuyuki Omae
Journal:  J Occup Health       Date:  2012-02-10       Impact factor: 2.708

2.  Interstitial pulmonary disorders in indium-processing workers.

Authors:  T Chonan; O Taguchi; K Omae
Journal:  Eur Respir J       Date:  2006-10-18       Impact factor: 16.671

3.  High levels of indium exposure relate to progressive emphysematous changes: a 9-year longitudinal surveillance of indium workers.

Authors:  Atsuko Amata; Tatsuya Chonan; Kazuyuki Omae; Hiroshi Nodera; Jiro Terada; Koichiro Tatsumi
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  2015-08-18       Impact factor: 9.139

4.  Causal relationship between indium compound inhalation and effects on the lungs.

Authors:  Makiko Nakano; Kazuyuki Omae; Akiyo Tanaka; Miyuki Hirata; Takehiro Michikawa; Yuriko Kikuchi; Noriyuki Yoshioka; Yuji Nishiwaki; Tatsuya Chonan
Journal:  J Occup Health       Date:  2009-10-16       Impact factor: 2.708

5.  Toxicology and carcinogenesis studies of indium phosphide (CAS No. 22398-90-7) in F344/N rats and B6C3F1 mice (inhalation studies).

Authors: 
Journal:  Natl Toxicol Program Tech Rep Ser       Date:  2001-07

6.  Five-year cohort study: emphysematous progression of indium-exposed workers.

Authors:  Makiko Nakano; Kazuyuki Omae; Kazuhiko Uchida; Takehiro Michikawa; Noriyuki Yoshioka; Miyuki Hirata; Akiyo Tanaka
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 9.410

7.  Exposure to hardly soluble indium compounds in ITO production and recycling plants is a new risk for interstitial lung damage.

Authors:  T Hamaguchi; K Omae; T Takebayashi; Y Kikuchi; N Yoshioka; Y Nishiwaki; A Tanaka; M Hirata; O Taguchi; T Chonan
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2007-07-11       Impact factor: 4.402

8.  Pulmonary effects in workers exposed to indium metal: A cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Makiko Nakano; Akiyo Tanaka; Miyuki Hirata; Satoko Iwasawa; Kazuyuki Omae
Journal:  J Occup Health       Date:  2015-05-08       Impact factor: 2.708

  8 in total
  4 in total

1.  Application of the ICRP respiratory tract model to estimate pulmonary retention of industrially sampled indium-containing dusts.

Authors:  Aleksandr B Stefaniak; M Abbas Virji; Melissa A Badding; Kristin J Cummings
Journal:  Inhal Toxicol       Date:  2017-06-08       Impact factor: 2.724

2.  Nitrative DNA damage in lung epithelial cells exposed to indium nanoparticles and indium ions.

Authors:  Sharif Ahmed; Hatasu Kobayashi; Tahmina Afroz; Ning Ma; Shinji Oikawa; Shosuke Kawanishi; Mariko Murata; Yusuke Hiraku
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Biomonitorization of concentrations of 28 elements in serum and urine among workers exposed to indium compounds.

Authors:  Nan Liu; Yi Guan; Bin Li; Sanqiao Yao
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-02-22       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Assessment of Occupational Exposure to Indium Dust for Indium-Tin-Oxide Manufacturing Workers.

Authors:  Boo Wook Kim; Wonseok Cha; Sungwon Choi; Jungah Shin; Byung-Soon Choi; Miyeon Kim
Journal:  Biomolecules       Date:  2021-03-12
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.