Literature DB >> 17626138

Exposure to hardly soluble indium compounds in ITO production and recycling plants is a new risk for interstitial lung damage.

T Hamaguchi1, K Omae, T Takebayashi, Y Kikuchi, N Yoshioka, Y Nishiwaki, A Tanaka, M Hirata, O Taguchi, T Chonan.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To identify the effects of indium on the lung and to assess exposure-effect and exposure-response relations between indium exposure and effects on the lungs.
METHODS: Ninety three male indium exposed and 93 male non-exposed workers from four ITO manufacturing or ITO recycling plants were analysed in a cross-sectional study. Indium in serum (In-S) was determined as a biological exposure index. Geometric means (GSD) of In-S were 8.25 ng/ml (4.55) in the exposed workers and 0.25 (2.64) in the non-exposed workers. The maximum concentration of In-S was 116.9 ng/ml. A questionnaire for respiratory symptoms and job histories, spirometry, high-resolution computerised tomography (HRCT) of the chest, serum KL-6, serum SP-A, serum SP-D and serum CRP were measured as the effect indices.
RESULTS: Spirometry, subjective symptoms and the prevalence of interstitial or emphysematous changes on lung HRCT showed no differences between exposed and non-exposed workers. Geometric means (GSD) of KL-6, SP-D and SP-A in the exposed workers were 495.4 U/ml (2.26), 85.2 ng/ml (2.02) and 39.6 ng/ml (1.57), and were significantly higher than those in the non-exposed workers. The prevalence (%) of the exposed and non-exposed workers exceeding the reference values were also significantly higher in KL-6 (41.9 vs 2.2), SP-D (39.8 vs 7.5), and SP-A (43.0 vs 24.7). Very sharp exposure-effect and exposure-response relations were discovered between In-S and KL-6 and between In-S and SP-D when the exposed workers were classified into seven groups by In-S.
CONCLUSIONS: The study outcomes with regard to the basis of serum immunochemistry biomarkers and HRCT indicate that exposure to hardly soluble indium compound dust may represent a risk for interstitial lung damage.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17626138     DOI: 10.1136/oem.2006.029124

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Occup Environ Med        ISSN: 1351-0711            Impact factor:   4.402


  27 in total

1.  Relationship between indium exposure and oxidative damage in workers in indium tin oxide production plants.

Authors:  Hung-Hsin Liu; Chang-Yun Chen; Gun-Ing Chen; Lien-Hsiung Lee; Hsiu-Ling Chen
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2011-08-11       Impact factor: 3.015

Review 2.  Systematic characterization of generation and management of e-waste in China.

Authors:  Huabo Duan; Jiukun Hu; Quanyin Tan; Lili Liu; Yanjie Wang; Jinhui Li
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2015-09-26       Impact factor: 4.223

Review 3.  The impact of nanomaterial characteristics on inhalation toxicity.

Authors:  Frank S Bierkandt; Lars Leibrock; Sandra Wagener; Peter Laux; Andreas Luch
Journal:  Toxicol Res (Camb)       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 3.524

4.  KL-6 is not ineffective biomarker of indium lung.

Authors:  Makiko Nakano; Kazuyuki Omae; Akiyo Tanaka; Miyuki Hirata
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2013-04-23       Impact factor: 3.015

5.  Pulmonary toxicity of indium-tin oxide production facility particles in rats.

Authors:  Melissa A Badding; Natalie R Fix; Marlene S Orandle; Mark W Barger; Katherine M Dunnick; Kristin J Cummings; Stephen S Leonard
Journal:  J Appl Toxicol       Date:  2015-10-15       Impact factor: 3.446

6.  Genotoxicity of indium tin oxide by Allium and Comet tests.

Authors:  İbrahim Hakkı Ciğerci; Recep Liman; Emre Özgül; Muhsin Konuk
Journal:  Cytotechnology       Date:  2013-12-12       Impact factor: 2.058

Review 7.  Exposure Potential and Health Impacts of Indium and Gallium, Metals Critical to Emerging Electronics and Energy Technologies.

Authors:  Sarah Jane O White; James P Shine
Journal:  Curr Environ Health Rep       Date:  2016-12

8.  Pulmonary alveolar proteinosis in workers at an indium processing facility.

Authors:  Kristin J Cummings; Walter E Donat; David B Ettensohn; Victor L Roggli; Peter Ingram; Kathleen Kreiss
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2009-12-17       Impact factor: 21.405

Review 9.  Research recommendations for selected IARC-classified agents.

Authors:  Elizabeth M Ward; Paul A Schulte; Kurt Straif; Nancy B Hopf; Jane C Caldwell; Tania Carreón; David M DeMarini; Bruce A Fowler; Bernard D Goldstein; Kari Hemminki; Cynthia J Hines; Kirsti Husgafvel Pursiainen; Eileen Kuempel; Joellen Lewtas; Ruth M Lunn; Elsebeth Lynge; Damien M McElvenny; Hartwig Muhle; Tamie Nakajima; Larry W Robertson; Nathaniel Rothman; Avima M Ruder; Mary K Schubauer-Berigan; Jack Siemiatycki; Debra Silverman; Martyn T Smith; Tom Sorahan; Kyle Steenland; Richard G Stevens; Paolo Vineis; Shelia Hoar Zahm; Lauren Zeise; Vincent J Cogliano
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2010-06-18       Impact factor: 9.031

10.  Use of and occupational exposure to indium in the United States.

Authors:  Cynthia J Hines; Jennifer L Roberts; Ronnee N Andrews; Matthew V Jackson; James A Deddens
Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 2.155

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.