OBJECTIVES: To identify the effects of indium on the lung and to assess exposure-effect and exposure-response relations between indium exposure and effects on the lungs. METHODS: Ninety three male indium exposed and 93 male non-exposed workers from four ITO manufacturing or ITO recycling plants were analysed in a cross-sectional study. Indium in serum (In-S) was determined as a biological exposure index. Geometric means (GSD) of In-S were 8.25 ng/ml (4.55) in the exposed workers and 0.25 (2.64) in the non-exposed workers. The maximum concentration of In-S was 116.9 ng/ml. A questionnaire for respiratory symptoms and job histories, spirometry, high-resolution computerised tomography (HRCT) of the chest, serum KL-6, serum SP-A, serum SP-D and serum CRP were measured as the effect indices. RESULTS: Spirometry, subjective symptoms and the prevalence of interstitial or emphysematous changes on lung HRCT showed no differences between exposed and non-exposed workers. Geometric means (GSD) of KL-6, SP-D and SP-A in the exposed workers were 495.4 U/ml (2.26), 85.2 ng/ml (2.02) and 39.6 ng/ml (1.57), and were significantly higher than those in the non-exposed workers. The prevalence (%) of the exposed and non-exposed workers exceeding the reference values were also significantly higher in KL-6 (41.9 vs 2.2), SP-D (39.8 vs 7.5), and SP-A (43.0 vs 24.7). Very sharp exposure-effect and exposure-response relations were discovered between In-S and KL-6 and between In-S and SP-D when the exposed workers were classified into seven groups by In-S. CONCLUSIONS: The study outcomes with regard to the basis of serum immunochemistry biomarkers and HRCT indicate that exposure to hardly soluble indium compound dust may represent a risk for interstitial lung damage.
OBJECTIVES: To identify the effects of indium on the lung and to assess exposure-effect and exposure-response relations between indium exposure and effects on the lungs. METHODS: Ninety three male indium exposed and 93 male non-exposed workers from four ITO manufacturing or ITO recycling plants were analysed in a cross-sectional study. Indium in serum (In-S) was determined as a biological exposure index. Geometric means (GSD) of In-S were 8.25 ng/ml (4.55) in the exposed workers and 0.25 (2.64) in the non-exposed workers. The maximum concentration of In-S was 116.9 ng/ml. A questionnaire for respiratory symptoms and job histories, spirometry, high-resolution computerised tomography (HRCT) of the chest, serum KL-6, serum SP-A, serum SP-D and serum CRP were measured as the effect indices. RESULTS: Spirometry, subjective symptoms and the prevalence of interstitial or emphysematous changes on lung HRCT showed no differences between exposed and non-exposed workers. Geometric means (GSD) of KL-6, SP-D and SP-A in the exposed workers were 495.4 U/ml (2.26), 85.2 ng/ml (2.02) and 39.6 ng/ml (1.57), and were significantly higher than those in the non-exposed workers. The prevalence (%) of the exposed and non-exposed workers exceeding the reference values were also significantly higher in KL-6 (41.9 vs 2.2), SP-D (39.8 vs 7.5), and SP-A (43.0 vs 24.7). Very sharp exposure-effect and exposure-response relations were discovered between In-S and KL-6 and between In-S and SP-D when the exposed workers were classified into seven groups by In-S. CONCLUSIONS: The study outcomes with regard to the basis of serum immunochemistry biomarkers and HRCT indicate that exposure to hardly soluble indium compound dust may represent a risk for interstitial lung damage.
Authors: Melissa A Badding; Natalie R Fix; Marlene S Orandle; Mark W Barger; Katherine M Dunnick; Kristin J Cummings; Stephen S Leonard Journal: J Appl Toxicol Date: 2015-10-15 Impact factor: 3.446
Authors: Kristin J Cummings; Walter E Donat; David B Ettensohn; Victor L Roggli; Peter Ingram; Kathleen Kreiss Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2009-12-17 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Elizabeth M Ward; Paul A Schulte; Kurt Straif; Nancy B Hopf; Jane C Caldwell; Tania Carreón; David M DeMarini; Bruce A Fowler; Bernard D Goldstein; Kari Hemminki; Cynthia J Hines; Kirsti Husgafvel Pursiainen; Eileen Kuempel; Joellen Lewtas; Ruth M Lunn; Elsebeth Lynge; Damien M McElvenny; Hartwig Muhle; Tamie Nakajima; Larry W Robertson; Nathaniel Rothman; Avima M Ruder; Mary K Schubauer-Berigan; Jack Siemiatycki; Debra Silverman; Martyn T Smith; Tom Sorahan; Kyle Steenland; Richard G Stevens; Paolo Vineis; Shelia Hoar Zahm; Lauren Zeise; Vincent J Cogliano Journal: Environ Health Perspect Date: 2010-06-18 Impact factor: 9.031
Authors: Cynthia J Hines; Jennifer L Roberts; Ronnee N Andrews; Matthew V Jackson; James A Deddens Journal: J Occup Environ Hyg Date: 2013 Impact factor: 2.155