BACKGROUND: Recent case reports and epidemiological studies suggest that inhalation of indium dust induces lung damage. OBJECTIVES: To elucidate the dose-dependent effects of indium on the lungs and to prove a causal relationship more clearly. METHODS: A baseline observation was conducted on 465 workers currently exposed to indium, 127 workers formerly exposed to indium and 169 workers without indium exposure in 12 factories and 1 research laboratory from 2003 to 2006. Indium in serum (In-S) was determined as an exposure parameter, and its effects on the lungs were examined. RESULTS: The means of In-S in the current, former and no exposure workers were 8.35, 9.63 and 0.56 ng/ml, respectively. The current and former exposure workers had significantly higher levels of KL-6, and showed significant dose-dependent increases in KL-6, SP-D, and SP-A. Current exposure workers with In-S of 3 ng/ml or above demonstrated a significant increase of KL-6 in both GM and prevalence exceeding the reference value. Approximately a quarter of the former exposure workers had interstitial changes as seen on chest HRCT. In-S of exposed workers who had been working before improvements of the working environment (Group Bef) and those who started working after improvements (Group Aft) were 12.29 and 0.81 ng/ml, respectively. Adjusted odds ratios indicated 87%, 71% and 44% reductions among Group Aft workers who exceeded the reference values of KL-6, SP-D and SP-A, respectively. CONCLUSION: Dose-dependent lung effects due to indium exposure were shown, and a decrease of indium exposure reduced the lung effects. An In-S value of 3 ng/ml may be a cut-off value which could be used to prevent early effects on the lungs.
BACKGROUND: Recent case reports and epidemiological studies suggest that inhalation of indium dust induces lung damage. OBJECTIVES: To elucidate the dose-dependent effects of indium on the lungs and to prove a causal relationship more clearly. METHODS: A baseline observation was conducted on 465 workers currently exposed to indium, 127 workers formerly exposed to indium and 169 workers without indium exposure in 12 factories and 1 research laboratory from 2003 to 2006. Indium in serum (In-S) was determined as an exposure parameter, and its effects on the lungs were examined. RESULTS: The means of In-S in the current, former and no exposure workers were 8.35, 9.63 and 0.56 ng/ml, respectively. The current and former exposure workers had significantly higher levels of KL-6, and showed significant dose-dependent increases in KL-6, SP-D, and SP-A. Current exposure workers with In-S of 3 ng/ml or above demonstrated a significant increase of KL-6 in both GM and prevalence exceeding the reference value. Approximately a quarter of the former exposure workers had interstitial changes as seen on chest HRCT. In-S of exposed workers who had been working before improvements of the working environment (Group Bef) and those who started working after improvements (Group Aft) were 12.29 and 0.81 ng/ml, respectively. Adjusted odds ratios indicated 87%, 71% and 44% reductions among Group Aft workers who exceeded the reference values of KL-6, SP-D and SP-A, respectively. CONCLUSION: Dose-dependent lung effects due to indium exposure were shown, and a decrease of indium exposure reduced the lung effects. An In-S value of 3 ng/ml may be a cut-off value which could be used to prevent early effects on the lungs.
Authors: Melissa A Badding; Natalie R Fix; Marlene S Orandle; Mark W Barger; Katherine M Dunnick; Kristin J Cummings; Stephen S Leonard Journal: J Appl Toxicol Date: 2015-10-15 Impact factor: 3.446
Authors: Jeffrey J Atkinson; Barbara A Lutey; Yoko Suzuki; Holly M Toennies; Diane G Kelley; Dale K Kobayashi; Whitney G Ijem; Gaetan Deslee; Carla H Moore; M Eileen Jacobs; Susan H Conradi; David S Gierada; Richard A Pierce; Tomoko Betsuyaku; Robert M Senior Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2010-11-05 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Kristin J Cummings; Makiko Nakano; Kazuyuki Omae; Koichiro Takeuchi; Tatsuya Chonan; Yong-Long Xiao; Russell A Harley; Victor L Roggli; Akira Hebisawa; Robert J Tallaksen; Bruce C Trapnell; Gregory A Day; Rena Saito; Marcia L Stanton; Eva Suarthana; Kathleen Kreiss Journal: Chest Date: 2011-12-29 Impact factor: 9.410
Authors: Cynthia J Hines; Jennifer L Roberts; Ronnee N Andrews; Matthew V Jackson; James A Deddens Journal: J Occup Environ Hyg Date: 2013 Impact factor: 2.155
Authors: William M Gwinn; Wei Qu; Cassandra J Shines; Ronald W Bousquet; Genie J Taylor; Michael P Waalkes; Daniel L Morgan Journal: Toxicol Sci Date: 2013-07-19 Impact factor: 4.849