Literature DB >> 27638570

A novel method for training residents in robotic hysterectomy.

Michael A Finan1, Michael E Clark2, Rodney P Rocconi3.   

Abstract

Standard surgeon training for robotic hysterectomy currently includes the use of a porcine lab to gain experience using the daVinci Surgical System. Residents in obstetrics/gynecology are taught using a novel dry lab which mimics the tasks specific to a robotic hysterectomy. This technique may ultimately aid in the credentialing of gynecologic surgeons, obviating the need for the porcine lab. A lab simulating the anatomy of key tasks in the hysterectomy with salpingo-oophorectomy has been developed using readily available materials. Residents perform simulated tasks under direct supervision. Time to complete, a subjective grading score, and any errors made are recorded and compared amongst the participants. From April 2007 through April 2008, 16 residents participated in the lab. Mean times (range, standard deviation) to perform simulated procedures were: 177.3 s (100-270, 48.2) for dexterity training, 71.9 s (32-171, 34.6) for identification of the ureter and sealing/dividing the infundibulopelvic ligament, 157.8 s (60-300, 76.8) for dissecting the bladder flap, 77 s (25-148, 34.8) for skeletonizing the uterine arteries, and 516 s (270-946, 237.8) for suturing the vaginal cuff. Since completing the lab, five residents have completed a total of 16 robotic hysterectomies on live patients, with no training-related patient complications. This lab closely mimics those segments of a hysterectomy on humans. Here, we describe a technique to train residents for robotic hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy without the use of a porcine lab.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Education; Gynecology; Hysterectomy; Resident; Robotic; Surgery

Year:  2010        PMID: 27638570     DOI: 10.1007/s11701-010-0179-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Robot Surg        ISSN: 1863-2483


  8 in total

1.  Robotic surgical education: a systematic approach to training urology residents to perform robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Hani H Rashid; Yuk-Yuen M Leung; Megan J Rashid; Gregory Oleyourryk; John R Valvo; Louis Eichel
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 2.649

2.  Virtual reality simulator training equals mechanical robotic training in improving robot-assisted basic suturing skills.

Authors:  F H Halvorsen; O J Elle; V V Dalinin; B E Mørk; V Sørhus; J S Røtnes; E Fosse
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-08-10       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Computer-enhanced robotic surgery in gynecologic oncology.

Authors:  Jayson B Field; Michelle F Benoit; Tri A Dinh; Concepcion Diaz-Arrastia
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-12-19       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  VR robotic surgery: randomized blinded study of the dV-Trainer robotic simulator.

Authors:  Thomas S Lendvay; Pasquale Casale; Robert Sweet; Craig Peters
Journal:  Stud Health Technol Inform       Date:  2008

5.  Development and evaluation of a training module for the clinical introduction of the da Vinci robotic system in visceral and vascular surgery.

Authors:  A Mehrabi; C L Yetimoglu; A Nickkholgh; A Kashfi; P Kienle; L Konstantinides; M R Ahmadi; H Fonouni; P Schemmer; H Friess; M M Gebhard; M W Büchler; J Schmidt; C N Gutt
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-07-20       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Robotic surgery training and performance: identifying objective variables for quantifying the extent of proficiency.

Authors:  K Narazaki; D Oleynikov; N Stergiou
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2005-12-07       Impact factor: 3.453

7.  Teaching robotic surgery: a stepwise approach.

Authors:  Mohamed R Ali; Jason Rasmussen; Bobby BhaskerRao
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-12-20       Impact factor: 3.453

8.  Making the transition from standard gynecologic laparoscopy to robotic laparoscopy.

Authors:  Jennifer L Ferguson; Todd M Beste; Keith H Nelson; James A Daucher
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2004 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 2.172

  8 in total
  6 in total

1.  Virtual reality robotic surgery simulation curriculum to teach robotic suturing: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Daniel J Kiely; Walter H Gotlieb; Susie Lau; Xing Zeng; Vanessa Samouelian; Agnihotram V Ramanakumar; Helena Zakrzewski; Sonya Brin; Shannon A Fraser; Pira Korsieporn; Laura Drudi; Joshua Z Press
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2015-05-16

2.  Trainee performance at robotic console and benchmark operative times.

Authors:  Andrea K Crane; Elizabeth J Geller; Catherine A Matthews
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2013-05-03       Impact factor: 2.894

3.  A comprehensive method to train residents in robotic hysterectomy techniques.

Authors:  Michael A Finan; Sarah Silver; Edward Otts; Rodney P Rocconi
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2010-08-10

4.  Outcomes of minimally invasive abdominal sacrocolpopexy with resident operative involvement.

Authors:  Emily A Slopnick; Adonis K Hijaz; J Welles Henderson; Sangeeta T Mahajan; Carvell T Nguyen; Simon P Kim
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2018-02-20       Impact factor: 2.894

5.  Validation of a novel virtual reality simulator for robotic surgery.

Authors:  Henk W R Schreuder; Jan E U Persson; Richard G H Wolswijk; Ingmar Ihse; Marlies P Schijven; René H M Verheijen
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2014-01-30

6.  [DeRAS I-German situation of robotic-assisted surgery-an online survey].

Authors:  C M Krüger; O Rückbeil; U Sebestyen; T Schlick; J Kürbis; H Riediger
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2021-06-25       Impact factor: 0.955

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.