Literature DB >> 16858531

Development and evaluation of a training module for the clinical introduction of the da Vinci robotic system in visceral and vascular surgery.

A Mehrabi1, C L Yetimoglu, A Nickkholgh, A Kashfi, P Kienle, L Konstantinides, M R Ahmadi, H Fonouni, P Schemmer, H Friess, M M Gebhard, M W Büchler, J Schmidt, C N Gutt.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: With the increasing use of the surgical robotic system in the clinical arena, appropriate training programs and assessment systems need to be established for mastery of this new technology. The authors aimed to design and evaluate a clinic-like training program for the clinical introduction of the da Vinci robotic system in visceral and vascular surgery.
METHODS: Four trainees with different surgical levels of experience participated in this study using the da Vinci telemanipulator. Each participant started with an initial evaluation stage composed of standardized visceral and vascular operations (cholecystectomy, gastrotomy, anastomosis of the small intestine, and anastomosis of the aorta) in a porcine model. Then the participants went on to the training stage with the rat model, performing standardized visceral and vascular operations (gastrotomy, anastomosis of the large and small intestines, and anastomosis of the aorta) four times in four rats. The final evaluation stage was again identical to the initial stage. The operative times, the number of complications, and the performance quality of the participants were compared between the two evaluation stages to assess the impact of the training stage on the results.
RESULTS: The operative times in the final evaluation stage were considerably shorter than in the initial evaluation stage and, except for cholecystectomies, all the differences reached statistical significance. Also, significantly fewer complications and improved quality for each operation in the final evaluation stage were documented, as compared with their counterparts in the initial evaluation stage. These improvements were recorded at each level of experience.
CONCLUSIONS: The presented experimental small and large animal model is a standardized and reproducible training method for robotic surgery that allows evaluation of the surgical performance while shortening and optimizing the learning-curve.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16858531     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-005-0612-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  39 in total

Review 1.  Robotics and allied technologies in endoscopic surgery.

Authors:  G F Buess; M O Schurr; S C Fischer
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2000-02

Review 2.  Granting clinical privileges for telerobotic surgery.

Authors:  Garth H Ballantyne; William E Kelley
Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 1.719

3.  The efficacy of robot-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic vascular anastomoses in an experimental model.

Authors:  D Nio; R Balm; S Maartense; M Guijt; W A Bemelman
Journal:  Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 7.069

Review 4.  Robot-assisted surgical systems: a new era in laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  J P Ruurda; Th J M V van Vroonhoven; I A M J Broeders
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 1.891

5.  Dexterity enhancement with robotic surgery.

Authors:  K Moorthy; Y Munz; A Dosis; J Hernandez; S Martin; F Bello; T Rockall; A Darzi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-04-06       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Manual robot assisted endoscopic suturing: time-action analysis in an experimental model.

Authors:  J P Ruurda; I A M J Broeders; B Pulles; F M Kappelhof; C van der Werken
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-05-28       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 7.  Robot-assisted abdominal surgery.

Authors:  C N Gutt; T Oniu; A Mehrabi; A Kashfi; P Schemmer; M W Büchler
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 6.939

8.  Robotically assisted laparoscopic microsurgical tubal reanastomosis: a feasibility study.

Authors:  M Degueldre; J Vandromme; P T Huong; G B Cadière
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 7.329

9.  Robotic totally endoscopic coronary artery bypass: program development and learning curve issues.

Authors:  J Bonatti; T Schachner; O Bernecker; O Chevtchik; N Bonaros; H Ott; G Friedrich; F Weidinger; G Laufer
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 5.209

10.  Advantages and limits of robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery: preliminary experience.

Authors:  F Corcione; C Esposito; D Cuccurullo; A Settembre; N Miranda; F Amato; F Pirozzi; P Caiazzo
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-11-18       Impact factor: 4.584

View more
  7 in total

1.  Validated robotic laparoscopic surgical training in a virtual-reality environment.

Authors:  Dimitrios Katsavelis; Ka-Chun Siu; Bernadette Brown-Clerk; Irene H Lee; Yong Kwon Lee; Dmitry Oleynikov; Nick Stergiou
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-04-10       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Robot-assisted laparoscopic gastrectomy with D2 dissection for adenocarcinoma: initial experience with 17 patients.

Authors:  R Pugliese; D Maggioni; F Sansonna; G C Ferrari; S Di Lernia; C Magistro; I Pauna; A Forgione; A Costanzi; C Brambilla; F Pugliese
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2008-11-26

3.  A novel method for training residents in robotic hysterectomy.

Authors:  Michael A Finan; Michael E Clark; Rodney P Rocconi
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2010-04-01

Review 4.  Learning tools and simulation in robotic surgery: state of the art.

Authors:  Nicolas C Buchs; François Pugin; Francesco Volonté; Philippe Morel
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 5.  Robotic surgery: review of the latest advances, risks, and outcomes.

Authors:  Mary Downes Gastrich; Joseph Barone; Gloria Bachmann; Mark Anderson; Adrian Balica
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2011-01-21

6.  A comprehensive method to train residents in robotic hysterectomy techniques.

Authors:  Michael A Finan; Sarah Silver; Edward Otts; Rodney P Rocconi
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2010-08-10

7.  Robotic-assisted laparoscopic gynecologic procedures in a fellowship training program.

Authors:  Paula S Lee; Amy Bland; Fidel A Valea; Laura J Havrilesky; Andrew Berchuck; Angeles Alvarez Secord
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2009 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 2.172

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.