Literature DB >> 16844450

Robotic surgical education: a systematic approach to training urology residents to perform robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.

Hani H Rashid1, Yuk-Yuen M Leung, Megan J Rashid, Gregory Oleyourryk, John R Valvo, Louis Eichel.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Robotic-assisted surgery using the da Vinci Surgical System is gaining popularity among urologists. However, training residents to use this system presents new challenges for surgical educators. We describe a method for training residents to perform robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy.
METHODS: Residents first received da Vinci certification training followed by table-side assistance with a second attending urologist present to provide real-time instruction. After demonstrating proficiency with assistance, residents performed segments of robotic prostatectomies as the console surgeon. The procedure was divided into five steps: (a) bladder take-down, (b) endopelvic fascia and dorsal venous complex, (c) bladder neck and posterior dissection, (d) neurovascular bundles, and (e) urethral anastomosis. Performance was rated using an analog scale (0, very poor to 5, outstanding). The resident was allowed to proceed to the next step once proficiency (score greater than 3 of 5) had been demonstrated on three separate occasions. In addition, each procedure was digitally recorded and reviewed with the attending physician after the operation.
RESULTS: Two chief residents underwent this training regimen. All 83 cases with surgical console involvement during a 7-month period were reviewed. The combined residents' mean operative time in minutes and overall performance (score 0 of 5 to 5 of 5) for each step were recorded. Using logistic regression analysis, a statistically significant trend was seen, with faster operative times and greater analog scores over time for both residents (P <0.005).
CONCLUSIONS: A systematic approach can be used to safely and effectively train urology residents to perform robotic radical prostatectomy using the da Vinci robotic system.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16844450     DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2006.01.057

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  32 in total

1.  Residency training program paradigms for teaching robotic surgical skills to urology residents.

Authors:  Sonal Grover; Gerald Y Tan; Abhishek Srivastava; Robert A Leung; Ashutosh K Tewari
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 2.  Training and outcome monitoring in robotic urologic surgery.

Authors:  Daniel Liberman; Quoc-Dien Trinh; Claudio Jeldres; Luc Valiquette; Kevin C Zorn
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2011-11-08       Impact factor: 14.432

3.  Robotic surgery in ophthalmology: reality or fantasy?

Authors:  R Douglas
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 4.638

4.  Robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: initial 15 cases in Japan.

Authors:  K Yoshioka; T Hatano; Y Nakagami; C Ozu; Y Horiguchi; H Yonou; M Tachibana; G Coughlin; V R Patel
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2008-05-22

5.  Developing technical expertise in robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy in a moderate-volume center through a proctor-based team approach.

Authors:  Shieh Ling Bang; Keng Siang Png; Yu Yi Yeow; Gerald Yau Min Tan; Yew Lam Chong
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2014-04-20

6.  A novel method for training residents in robotic hysterectomy.

Authors:  Michael A Finan; Michael E Clark; Rodney P Rocconi
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2010-04-01

7.  Development and validation of surgical training tool: cystectomy assessment and surgical evaluation (CASE) for robot-assisted radical cystectomy for men.

Authors:  Ahmed A Hussein; Kevin J Sexton; Paul R May; Maxwell V Meng; Abolfazl Hosseini; Daniel D Eun; Siamak Daneshmand; Bernard H Bochner; James O Peabody; Ronney Abaza; Eila C Skinner; Richard E Hautmann; Khurshid A Guru
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-04-13       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Surgeons and astronauts: so close, yet so far apart.

Authors:  Chad G Ball; Andrew W Kirkpatrick; David V Feliciano; Richard Reznick; Norman E McSwain
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 2.089

Review 9.  Simulation-based training in robot-assisted surgery: current evidence of value and potential trends for the future.

Authors:  Michael I Hanzly; Tareq Al-Tartir; Syed Johar Raza; Atif Khan; Mohammad Manan Durrani; Thomas Fiorica; Phillip Ginsberg; James L Mohler; Boris Kuvshinoff; Khurshid A Guru
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 3.092

10.  Retention of fundamental surgical skills learned in robot-assisted surgery.

Authors:  Irene H Suh; Mukul Mukherjee; Bhavin C Shah; Dmitry Oleynikov; Ka-Chun Siu
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2011-09-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.