Literature DB >> 27637237

Analysis of postoperative pain in robotic versus traditional laparoscopic hysterectomy.

Raymond E Betcher1,2, James P Chaney3,4, Pamela R Lacy3,4, Stephen K Otey3,4, Duke J Wood3,4.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to assess postoperative pain and narcotic use in the first 23 h following robotic versus traditional laparoscopic hysterectomy for benign pathology. The study design was that of a retrospective case-control study of robotic (first 100 consecutive) versus traditional (last 100 consecutive) total laparoscopic hysterectomy cases at an obstetrics and gynecology multi-institutional community practice. Patient characteristics were equivalent in both groups (age, p = 0.364; body mass index, p = 0.326; uterine weight, p = 0.565), except for a higher number of Caucasians in the traditional laparoscopic group (p = 0.017). Compared to patients who underwent robotic laparoscopic hysterectomy, those who underwent the traditional procedure had higher visual analog scale pain scores (3.1 ± 1.5 vs. 4.6 ± 2.4, respectively; p < 0.001) and used more narcotics (27.5 vs. 35.4 mg hydrocodone, respectively; p < 0.05). Factors that could potentially increase pain (more procedures, more ports, total incision size, and longer operative time) were significantly higher in the robotic group, but only surgical approach, amount of narcotic, and age correlated with pain levels when evaluated with regression analysis. Complication rates were equivalent between groups. In conclusion, patients who underwent robotic assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy had statistically decreased postoperative pain scores and narcotic use than those who underwent the traditional laparoscopic approach, even when the robotic cases involved more procedures and ports and were associated with longer operative time.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Laparoscopic hysterectomy; Minimally invasive surgery; Narcotics; Pain; Robotic; da Vinci

Year:  2013        PMID: 27637237     DOI: 10.1007/s11701-013-0418-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Robot Surg        ISSN: 1863-2483


  24 in total

Review 1.  Robotic-assisted surgery for the community gynecologist: can it be adopted?

Authors:  Thomas N Payne; Michael C Pitter
Journal:  Clin Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 2.190

2.  Clinical and cost comparisons for hysterectomy via abdominal, standard laparoscopic, vaginal and robot-assisted approaches.

Authors:  Laurie B Landeen; Maria C Bell; Helen B Hubert; Larissa Y Bennis; Siri S Knutsen-Larson; Usha Seshadri-Kreaden
Journal:  S D Med       Date:  2011-06

3.  Robotic hysterectomy versus conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy: outcome and cost analyses of a matched case-control study.

Authors:  Dimitri Sarlos; Lavonne Kots; Nebojsa Stevanovic; Gabriel Schaer
Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol       Date:  2010-03-05       Impact factor: 2.435

4.  Laparoscopic compared with robotic sacrocolpopexy for vaginal prolapse: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Marie Fidela R Paraiso; J Eric Jelovsek; Anna Frick; Chi Chung Grace Chen; Matthew D Barber
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 7.661

5.  Preemptive multimodal analgesia facilitates same-day discharge following robot-assisted hysterectomy.

Authors:  Thomas M Shultz
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2011-05-28

6.  Satisfaction and regret after open retropubic or robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Florian R Schroeck; Tracey L Krupski; Leon Sun; David M Albala; Marva M Price; Thomas J Polascik; Cary N Robertson; Alok K Tewari; Judd W Moul
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2008-06-23       Impact factor: 20.096

7.  Perioperative outcomes of robotically assisted hysterectomy for benign cases with complex pathology.

Authors:  John F Boggess; Paola A Gehrig; Leigh Cantrell; Aaron Shafer; Alberto Mendivil; Emma Rossi; Rabbie Hanna
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 7.661

8.  Postoperative pain and recovery after conventional laparoscopy compared with robotically assisted laparoscopy.

Authors:  Lena El Hachem; Uchenna C Acholonu; Farr R Nezhat
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 7.661

9.  Laparoscopic hysterectomy with and without a robot: Stanford experience.

Authors:  Camran Nezhat; Ofer Lavie; Madeleine Lemyre; Ofer Gemer; Lisa Bhagan; Ceana Nezhat
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2009 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.172

10.  Comparison of Perioperative Outcomes of Total Laparoscopic and Robotically Assisted Hysterectomy for Benign Pathology during Introduction of a Robotic Program.

Authors:  Gokhan Sami Kilic; Gradie Moore; Ayman Elbatanony; Carmen Radecki; John Y Phelps; Mostafa A Borahay
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Int       Date:  2011-10-05
View more
  6 in total

1.  Perioperative outcomes of three-port robotically assisted hysterectomy: a continuous series of 53 cases.

Authors:  Patrick Dällenbach; Patrick Petignat
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2014-03-11

2.  Surgeon's Impact on Opioid Epidemic Following Uncomplicated Laparoscopic Appendectomy and Cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Aakash Trivedi; James Yang; Daniel Barbash; Felippe Sartorato; Daniel J Scheinberg; Marc Meyers; Jamshed Zuberi; Benjamin Rebein
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-05-20

Review 3.  Laparoscopic versus robotic major hepatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ioannis A Ziogas; Dimitrios Giannis; Stepan M Esagian; Konstantinos P Economopoulos; Samer Tohme; David A Geller
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2020-09-28       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Comparison of analgesic requirements in robot-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic abdominal surgeries.

Authors:  Athira Suresh Mangalath; Lakshmi Kumar; Ambreen Basheer Sawant; Rajesh Kesavan; Greeshma Ravindran; Rajan Sunil
Journal:  J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2021-04-10

5.  Evaluation of lignocaine, dexmedetomidine, lignocaine-dexmedetomidine infusion on pain and quality of recovery for robotic abdominal hysterectomy: a prospective randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Pudi Sivaji; Sanjay Agrawal; Ajay Kumar; Anupama Bahadur
Journal:  Braz J Anesthesiol       Date:  2021-11-27

6.  A national database propensity score-matched comparison of minimally invasive and open colectomy for long-term opioid use.

Authors:  Amir L Bastawrous; Kara K Brockhaus; Melissa I Chang; Gediwon Milky; I-Fan Shih; Yanli Li; Robert K Cleary
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2021-02-10       Impact factor: 4.584

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.