OBJECTIVE: To compare postoperative pain after conventional laparoscopic and robotically assisted laparoscopic surgery in gynecology. METHODS: This is a prospective nonrandomized analysis of patients undergoing conventional laparoscopy or robotically assisted laparoscopy in a university-affiliated hospital between March 2011 and March 2012. Postoperative pain was measured using the Numeric Rating Scale and the narcotic use converted to morphine sulfate equivalents. The primary outcome was the Numeric Rating Scale pain score obtained on the first postoperative day. RESULTS: One hundred ten patients were enrolled; 91 were included in the statistical analysis. Both groups were similar with regard to race, history of abdominopelvic surgeries, psychiatric history, and substance abuse. Patients undergoing robotically assisted laparoscopy were 6 years older and had a body mass index 6 points higher. Median length of hospital stay for conventional laparoscopy and robotically assisted laparoscopy was 2 days and 3 days, respectively (P<.001); median to being off narcotics was 4 days and 4.5 days, respectively (P=.336); and median return to normal activities was 13 days and 21 days, respectively (P=.021). There were no significant differences in mean Numeric Rating Scale pain scores over time (P=.499) or mean narcotic requirements (P=.393) between groups. CONCLUSION: Robotically assisted laparoscopy is equivalent to conventional laparoscopy in terms of subjective and objective measures of postoperative pain.
OBJECTIVE: To compare postoperative pain after conventional laparoscopic and robotically assisted laparoscopic surgery in gynecology. METHODS: This is a prospective nonrandomized analysis of patients undergoing conventional laparoscopy or robotically assisted laparoscopy in a university-affiliated hospital between March 2011 and March 2012. Postoperative pain was measured using the Numeric Rating Scale and the narcotic use converted to morphine sulfate equivalents. The primary outcome was the Numeric Rating Scale pain score obtained on the first postoperative day. RESULTS: One hundred ten patients were enrolled; 91 were included in the statistical analysis. Both groups were similar with regard to race, history of abdominopelvic surgeries, psychiatric history, and substance abuse. Patients undergoing robotically assisted laparoscopy were 6 years older and had a body mass index 6 points higher. Median length of hospital stay for conventional laparoscopy and robotically assisted laparoscopy was 2 days and 3 days, respectively (P<.001); median to being off narcotics was 4 days and 4.5 days, respectively (P=.336); and median return to normal activities was 13 days and 21 days, respectively (P=.021). There were no significant differences in mean Numeric Rating Scale pain scores over time (P=.499) or mean narcotic requirements (P=.393) between groups. CONCLUSION: Robotically assisted laparoscopy is equivalent to conventional laparoscopy in terms of subjective and objective measures of postoperative pain.
Authors: Jacob Hutchins; Rachel Isaksson Vogel; Rahel Ghebre; Amy McNally; Levi S Downs; Elizabeth Gryzmala; Melissa A Geller Journal: Int J Gynecol Cancer Date: 2015-06 Impact factor: 3.437
Authors: Richard G Arms; Charlotte C Sun; Jennifer K Burzawa; Nicole D Fleming; Alpa M Nick; Vijayashri Rallapalli; Shannon N Westin; Larissa A Meyer; Pedro T Ramirez; Pamela T Soliman Journal: Gynecol Oncol Date: 2015-07-18 Impact factor: 5.482
Authors: Renato Roriz-Silva; Ramon Vilallonga; Jose Manuel Fort; Jad Khoraki; Amador Garcia Ruiz de Gordejuela; Oscar Gonzalez; Enric Caubet; María Rita Rodríguez-Luna; Manel Armengol Journal: J Robot Surg Date: 2022-02-26
Authors: Alan Tan; Hutan Ashrafian; Alasdair J Scott; Sam E Mason; Leanne Harling; Thanos Athanasiou; Ara Darzi Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2016-02-19 Impact factor: 4.584
Authors: Georgios Gitas; I Alkatout; L Proppe; L Hanker; L Allahqoli; G Grimbizis; A Rody; N Werner; S Sommer; S Baum Journal: Arch Gynecol Obstet Date: 2021-12-26 Impact factor: 2.493
Authors: Rachel L Barr Grzesh; Alejandro D Treszezamsky; Suzanne S Fenske; Lauren G Rascoff; Erin L Moshier; Charles Ascher-Walsh Journal: JSLS Date: 2018 Jul-Sep Impact factor: 2.172