Literature DB >> 21857170

Robotic-assisted surgery for the community gynecologist: can it be adopted?

Thomas N Payne1, Michael C Pitter.   

Abstract

The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists and the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists confirm advantages of conventional minimally invasive surgery over laparotomy for benign gynecological procedures; however, adoption remains low for the general gynecologist. A systematic search for gynecology publications was performed using Medline and Scopus. Available data on adoption rates and perioperative outcomes for hysterectomy, myomectomy, sacrocolpopexy, and endometriosis were reviewed. Robotic assistance may provide an improved rate of minimally invasive surgery adoption with equivalent perioperative outcomes to that of conventional techniques. Accessibility and cost remain controversial. Formal training programs are being created to address these issues.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21857170     DOI: 10.1097/GRF.0b013e31822b4998

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0009-9201            Impact factor:   2.190


  13 in total

1.  Analysis of postoperative pain in robotic versus traditional laparoscopic hysterectomy.

Authors:  Raymond E Betcher; James P Chaney; Pamela R Lacy; Stephen K Otey; Duke J Wood
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2013-07-03

2.  An analysis of the impact of previous laparoscopic hysterectomy experience on the learning curve for robotic hysterectomy.

Authors:  A Eddib; N Jain; M Aalto; S Hughes; A Eswar; M Erk; C Michalik; V Krovi; P Singhal
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2013-02-27

3.  Robot-assisted vaginal hysterectomy: two cases.

Authors:  Pierre Collinet; Manuel Ascencio; Jean-Philippe Lucot; Michel Cosson
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2012-10-25

4.  Impact of Robotic Surgery on Decision Making: Perspectives of Surgical Teams.

Authors:  Rebecca Randell; Natasha Alvarado; Stephanie Honey; Joanne Greenhalgh; Peter Gardner; Arron Gill; David Jayne; Alwyn Kotze; Alan Pearman; Dawn Dowding
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2015-11-05

5.  Retrospective analysis of robot-assisted versus standard laparoscopy in the treatment of pelvic pain indicative of endometriosis.

Authors:  John F Dulemba; Cyndi Pelzel; Helen B Hubert
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2012-06-27

6.  Comparison of robotic, laparoscopic, and abdominal myomectomy in a community hospital.

Authors:  Joseph M Gobern; C J Rosemeyer; James F Barter; Albert J Steren
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2013 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.172

7.  Factors supporting and constraining the implementation of robot-assisted surgery: a realist interview study.

Authors:  Rebecca Randell; Stephanie Honey; Natasha Alvarado; Joanne Greenhalgh; Jon Hindmarsh; Alan Pearman; David Jayne; Peter Gardner; Arron Gill; Alwyn Kotze; Dawn Dowding
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-06-14       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 8.  Plastic and reconstructive uterus operations by minimally invasive surgery? A review on myomectomy.

Authors:  Anja Hirschelmann; Rudy Leon De Wilde
Journal:  GMS Interdiscip Plast Reconstr Surg DGPW       Date:  2012-01-09

9.  Robotically Assisted Hysterectomy versus Vaginal Hysterectomy for Benign Disease: A Prospective Study.

Authors:  M Carbonnel; H Abbou; H T N'guyen; S Roy; G Hamdi; A Jnifen; J M Ayoubi
Journal:  Minim Invasive Surg       Date:  2013-07-07

10.  Association between Obesity, Surgical Route, and Perioperative Outcomes in Patients with Uterine Cancer.

Authors:  Entidhar Al Sawah; Jason L Salemi; Mitchel Hoffman; Anthony N Imudia; Emad Mikhail
Journal:  Minim Invasive Surg       Date:  2018-06-19
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.