Literature DB >> 2761400

Altering memory through recall: the effects of cue-guided retrieval processing.

M A McDaniel, M D Kowitz, P K Dunay.   

Abstract

Three experiments were designed to investigate the influence of initial recall on memory by assessing delayed recall after different immediate cued-recall tests. In all experiments, subjects performed semantic and phonemic encoding tasks on a word list. The subjects then received a cued-recall test that cued the target using the same word as the context word in the encoding task, a test that cued the target with a word from the same level at which the target was encoded, a test that cued the target with a cue from a different level at which the target was encoded, or no immediate-recall test. One day later, the subjects performed a final cued-recall test in which the type of cue (semantic or phonemic) was varied. Consistently, delayed recall was facilitated primarily when the cue on the immediate test was from the same level as the cue on the delayed test. This pattern of facilitation suggests that immediate cued-recall produces an elaboration of an existing memory representation that is closely tied to the type of cue used on the immediate test.

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2761400     DOI: 10.3758/bf03202614

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  3 in total

1.  The effect of recall upon recognition.

Authors:  N G HANAWALT; A G TARR
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1961-10

2.  Some effects of remembering on forgetting.

Authors:  W N Runquist
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1983-11

3.  Strategy use in question-answering: memory strength and task constraints on fan effects.

Authors:  L M Reder; C Wible
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1984-07
  3 in total
  10 in total

1.  Hypermnesia: age-related differences between young and older adults.

Authors:  R L Widner; H Otani; A D Smith
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2000-06

2.  The influence of retrieval on retention.

Authors:  M Carrier; H Pashler
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1992-11

3.  Impoverished cue support enhances subsequent retention: support for the elaborative retrieval explanation of the testing effect.

Authors:  Shana K Carpenter; Edward L DeLosh
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2006-03

4.  What types of learning are enhanced by a cued recall test?

Authors:  Shana K Carpenter; Harold Pashler; Edward Vul
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2006-10

5.  Inoculating against eyewitness suggestibility via interpolated verbatim vs. gist testing.

Authors:  Ainat Pansky; Einat Tenenboim
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2011-01

6.  Familiarity and retrieval processes in delayed judgments of learning.

Authors:  Janet Metcalfe; Bridgid Finn
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 3.051

7.  Testing potentiates new learning in the misinformation paradigm.

Authors:  Leamarie T Gordon; Ayanna K Thomas
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2014-02

8.  Errorful and errorless learning: The impact of cue-target constraint in learning from errors.

Authors:  Emma K Bridger; Axel Mecklinger
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2014-08

9.  Incidental visual memory and metamemory for a famous monument.

Authors:  Pedro R Montoro; Marcos Ruiz
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2022-03-31       Impact factor: 2.157

10.  The beneficial effect of testing: an event-related potential study.

Authors:  Cheng-Hua Bai; Emma K Bridger; Hubert D Zimmer; Axel Mecklinger
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2015-09-17       Impact factor: 3.558

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.