Literature DB >> 17328380

What types of learning are enhanced by a cued recall test?

Shana K Carpenter1, Harold Pashler, Edward Vul.   

Abstract

In two experiments, we investigated what types of learning benefit from a cued recall test. After initial exposure to a word pair (A+B), subjects experienced either an intervening cued recall test (A-->?) with feedback, or a restudy presentation (A-->B). The final test could be cued recall in the same (A-->?) or opposite (?-->B) direction, or free recall of just the cues (Recall As) or just the targets (Recall Bs). All final tests revealed a benefit for testing as opposed to restudying. Tests produced a direct benefit for information that was retrieved on the intervening test (B). This benefit also "spilled over" to facilitate recall of information that was present on the test but not retrieved (A). Both theoretical and practical implications are discussed.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17328380     DOI: 10.3758/bf03194004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  10 in total

1.  The integrity of Web-delivered experiments: can you trust the data?

Authors:  K O McGraw; M D Tew; J E Williams
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2000-11

2.  Associative symmetry and memory theory.

Authors:  Michael J Kahana
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2002-09

3.  The influence of retrieval on retention.

Authors:  M Carrier; H Pashler
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1992-11

4.  Different rates of forgetting following study versus test trials.

Authors:  Mark A Wheeler; Michael Ewers; Joseph F Buonanno
Journal:  Memory       Date:  2003-11

5.  Test-enhanced learning: taking memory tests improves long-term retention.

Authors:  Henry L Roediger; Jeffrey D Karpicke
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2006-03

6.  Impoverished cue support enhances subsequent retention: support for the elaborative retrieval explanation of the testing effect.

Authors:  Shana K Carpenter; Edward L DeLosh
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2006-03

7.  Retrieval-induced facilitation: initially nontested material can benefit from prior testing of related material.

Authors:  Jason C K Chan; Kathleen B McDermott; Henry L Roediger
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2006-11

8.  Altering memory through recall: the effects of cue-guided retrieval processing.

Authors:  M A McDaniel; M D Kowitz; P K Dunay
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1989-07

9.  Standards for Internet-based experimenting.

Authors:  Ulf-Dietrich Reips
Journal:  Exp Psychol       Date:  2002

Review 10.  Patients' memory for medical information.

Authors:  Roy P C Kessels
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 18.000

  10 in total
  26 in total

1.  Tests enhance retention and transfer of spatial learning.

Authors:  Shana K Carpenter; Jonathan W Kelly
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2012-06

2.  Inhibition and interference in the think/no-think task.

Authors:  Mihály Racsmány; Martin A Conway; Attila Keresztes; Attila Krajcsi
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2012-02

3.  Enhancing visuospatial learning: the benefit of retrieval practice.

Authors:  Sean H K Kang
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2010-12

4.  The "pure-study" learning curve: the learning curve without cumulative testing.

Authors:  Henry L Roediger; Megan A Smith
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2012-10

5.  Does test-enhanced learning transfer for triple associates?

Authors:  Steven C Pan; Carol M Wong; Zachary E Potter; Jonathan Mejia; Timothy C Rickard
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2016-01

6.  Testing beyond words: using tests to enhance visuospatial map learning.

Authors:  Shana K Carpenter; Harold Pashler
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2007-06

7.  Examining the efficiency of schedules of distributed retrieval practice.

Authors:  Mary A Pyc; Katherine A Rawson
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2007-12

8.  Enhancing learning and retarding forgetting: choices and consequences.

Authors:  Harold Pashler; Doug Rohrer; Nicholas J Cepeda; Shana K Carpenter
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2007-04

9.  How crucial is the response format for the testing effect?

Authors:  Fredrik U Jönsson; Veit Kubik; Max Larsson Sundqvist; Ivo Todorov; Bert Jonsson
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2013-10-31

10.  Comparison of the effect of post-instruction multiple-choice and short-answer tests on delayed retention learning.

Authors:  Sn Ramraje; Pl Sable
Journal:  Australas Med J       Date:  2011-06-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.