| Literature DB >> 27596850 |
Se Woong Kang1, Hoyoung Lee2, Kunho Bae2, Joo Young Shin3, Sang Jin Kim2, Jong Min Kim2.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The purpose was to investigate precursor lesions of polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (PCV).Entities:
Keywords: Age-related macular degeneration; Drusen-like deposit; Pigmentary change; Polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27596850 PMCID: PMC5285414 DOI: 10.1007/s00417-016-3452-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol ISSN: 0721-832X Impact factor: 3.117
Fig. 1Fundus color photographs (a, b), fluorescein (c, d) and indocyanine green (e, f) angiographs, infrared images (g, h) and optical coherence tomographs (i, j) of a 58-year-old man with unilateral polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy. In the right column, the multimodal images of the left eye with polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy are demonstrated. In the left column, the multimodal images of the uninvolved right eye are demonstrated, which represents the eyes in Group 1. (a) Funduscopic examination reveals drusen-like deposits (DLD, arrow) of a grayish yellow-colored sub-retinal deposit with irregular but discrete margins in the parafoveal area. (c, g) Pigmentary changes (solid arrow heads) adjacent to DLDs visualized by fluorescein angiography and fundus autofluorescence imaging. (e) Mild choroidal hyperpermeability and punctate hyperfluorescent spots (open arrow heads) on indocyanine green angiography. In this case, a DLD is spatially correlated with punctate hyperfluorescent spots (i) Optical coherence tomography scanning over the DLD reveals subretinal deposits, different from that of soft drusen, which usually show dome-like elevation due to sub-retinal-pigment-epithelial accumulation. The subfoveal choroidal thickness is 256 μm
Fig. 2Funduscopic and optical coherence tomographic (OCT) images in the unaffected fellow eyes of patients with unilateral polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy are presented. All cases are from Group 1. (a, b) These eyes show drusen-like deposits (DLD, arrows) and pigmentary changes (solid arrow heads). There are DLDs represented by yellowish deposits with irregular but discrete margins. The DLD manifests as an amorphous subretinal deposit usually disrupting the ellipsoid zone on OCT. OCT manifestations of pigmentary changes range from mild attenuation in the interdigitation zone (a) to severe disruption in the outer retina involving the ellipsoid zone and even the external limiting membrane (b). Choroidal thickening is remarkable in both cases. (c, d) These eyes show only pigmentary changes on funduscopy. The third row case exhibits mild disruption in the interdigitation zone and retinal pigment epithelium/Bruch’s complex on OCT. In contrast, a double layer sign (open arrow heads) on OCT is conspicuous in the fourth row case. (e) In a significant proportion of eyes in Group 1, no specific abnormality was noted, as in this case
Basic demographic characteristics of the study subjects
| Group 1 | Group 2 | Group 3 | Overall |
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N (eyes) | 154 | 59 | 63 | ||||
| Age (years) | 67.2 ± 8.1 | 71.6 ± 8.9 | 66.9 ± 9.4 | 0.002 | 0.182 | 0.006 | 0.001 |
| M : F | 2.2:1 | 0.9:1 | 0.7:1 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.465 | 0.005 |
Group 1: fellow eye of unilateral polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy; Group 2: fellow eye of unilateral typical exudative age-related macular degeneration; Group 3: fellow eye of unilateral epiretinal membrane, as a control
* comparison of all Groups, by ANOVA for continuous variables and chi-square test for non-continuous variables. P value less than 0.05 is considered significant
The independent Student’s T-test was used for the comparison of age, and Fisher’s exact test was used for the comparison of gender in each group. P value less than 0.016 after Bonferroni correction is considered significant
† comparison of Groups 1 and 3
‡ comparison of Groups 2 and 3
** comparison of Groups 1 and 2
Frequency of funduscopic findings in each group
| Group 1 | Group 2 | Group 3 | Overall |
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N. of participants | 154 | 59 | 63 | ||||
| Drusen type | |||||||
| Small hard drusen | 33.8 % | 27.1 % | 19.0 % | 0.091 | |||
| RPD | 0.6 % | 22.0 % | 1.6 % | <0.001 | 0.497 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
| Soft drusen | 4.5 % | 25.4 % | 8.0 % | <0.001 | 0.110 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
| Presence of DLD | 24.7 % | 3.4 % | 9.5 % | <0.001 | 0.015 | 0.275 | <0.001 |
| Size of DLD | <0.001 | 0.001 | 1.000 | 0.002 | |||
| <125 μm | 80.5 % | 96.6 % | 96.8 % | ||||
| > 125 μm | 19.5 % | 3.4 % | 3.2 % | ||||
| Pigmentary changes | 39.6 % | 35.6 % | 14.3 % | 0.001 | <0.001 | 0.011 | 0.639 |
Group 1: fellow eye of unilateral polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy; Group 2: fellow eye of unilateral typical exudative age-related macular degeneration; Group 3: fellow eye of unilateral epiretinal membrane, as a control
Drusen-like deposits (DLD) were defined as sub-retinal or sub-retinal pigment epithelial grayish yellow deposits larger than 63 μm in size with irregular but discrete margins
RPD: reticular pseudodrusen
* comparison of all Groups; P value less than 0.05 is considered significant
† comparison of Groups 1 and 3; P value less than 0.016 is considered significant
‡ comparison of Groups 2 and 3; P value less than 0.016 is considered significant
** comparison of Groups 1 and 2; P value less than 0.016 is considered significant
Frequency of spectral domain optical coherence tomography findings in each group
| Group 1 | Group 2 | Group 3 | Overall |
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N. of participants | 154 | 59 | 63 | ||||
| Double layer sign | 9.1 % | 10.2 % | 0.0 % | 0.015 | 0.012 | 0.011 | 0.797 |
| Elevation by DLD or soft drusen | 16.9 % | 37.3 % | 1.6 % | <0.001 | 0.001 | <0.001 | 0.003 |
| Elevation by PED | 5.8 % | 8.5 % | 0.0 % | 0.049 | 0.062 | 0.024 | 0.539 |
| Disruption of RPE | 4.5 % | 8.5 % | 1.6 % | 0.203 | |||
| Choroidal thickness, μm | 261.4 ± 99.0 | 178.2 ± 101.0 | 207.4 ± 77.6 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.080 | <0.001 |
Group 1: fellow eye of unilateral polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy; Group 2: fellow eye of unilateral typical exudative age-related
macular degeneration; Group 3: fellow eye of unilateral epiretinal membrane, as a control
DLD, drusen-like deposits; PED, pigment epithelial detachment; RPE, retinal pigment epithelium
* comparison of all Groups; P value less than 0.05 is considered significant
† comparison of Groups 1 and 3; P value less than 0.016 is considered significant
‡ comparison of Groups 2 and 3; P value less than 0.016 is considered significant
** comparison of Groups 1 and 2; P value less than 0.016 is considered significant
Indocyanine green angiography findings in Groups 1 and 2
| Group 1 | Group 2 |
| |
|---|---|---|---|
| N. of participants | 154 | 59 | |
| Choroidal hyperpermeability | 23.4 % | 6.8 % | 0.005 |
| Punctate hyperfluorescence spot | |||
| 0–2 | 23.4 % | 28.8 % | 0.647 |
| 3–10 | 20.8 % | 23.7 % | |
| 10–20 | 27.3 % | 18.6 % | |
| 20–40 | 19.5 % | 16.9 % | |
| >40 | 9.1 % | 11.9 % | |
| Late geographic hyperfluorescence | 9.7 % | 1.7 % | 0.076 |
| Spatially correlated punctate hyperfluorescence spots and DLD | 18.2 % | 0.0 % | <0.001 |
| Spatially correlated punctate hyperfluorescence spots and choroidal hyperpermeability | 8.4 % | 5.1 % | 0.565 |
Group 1: fellow eye of unilateral polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy; Group 2: fellow eye of unilateral typical exudative
age-related macular degeneration; Group 3: fellow eye of unilateral epiretinal membrane, as a control
DLD, drusen-like deposits
† comparison of Groups 1 and 2
Fig. 3Funduscopic and optical coherence tomographic (OCT) images comparing drusen-like deposits (DLD, a, b) and soft drusen (c, d). Compared with soft drusen, DLD exhibits a relatively larger size with a non-circular and irregular margin. Asymmetric distribution between two eyes also characterizes DLD. DLD manifests as an amorphous subretinal deposit usually disrupting the ellipsoid zone on OCT