Literature DB >> 12359593

Ten-year incidence and progression of age-related maculopathy: The Beaver Dam eye study.

Ronald Klein1, Barbara E K Klein, Sandra C Tomany, Stacy M Meuer, Guan-Hua Huang.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of the study was to describe the 10-year incidence and progression of retinal drusen, retinal pigmentary abnormalities, and signs of late age-related maculopathy.
DESIGN: Population-based cohort study. PARTICIPANTS: The study included 4926 persons, 43 to 86 years of age at the time of a baseline examination from 1988 through 1990, living in Beaver Dam, Wisconsin, of whom 3684 participated in a 5-year follow-up examination and 2764 participated in a 10-year follow-up.
METHODS: Characteristics of drusen and other lesions typical of age-related maculopathy were determined by grading stereoscopic color fundus photographs using the Wisconsin Age-Related Maculopathy Grading System. MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURES: Incidence of drusen type and size, pigmentary abnormalities, geographic atrophy, and exudative degeneration.
RESULTS: The 10-year incidence of early age-related maculopathy was 12.1% and of late age-related maculopathy it was 2.1%. There was a statistically significant increased incidence of age-related maculopathy lesions with age (P < 0.05). Individuals 75 years of age or older at baseline had significantly (P < 0.01) higher 10-year incidences of the following characteristics than people 43 to 54 years of age: larger sized drusen (125 micro m-249 micro m, 26.3% vs. 3.3%; > or =250 micro m, 16.2% vs. 1.0%), soft indistinct drusen (22.2% vs. 2.2%), retinal pigment abnormalities (19.5% vs. 0.8%), exudative macular degeneration (4.1% vs. 0%), and pure geographic atrophy (3.1% vs. 0%). Compared with those with small numbers of only small, hard drusen (1-2), those with large numbers of only hard drusen (8 or more) had an increased 10-year incidence of both soft drusen (12.3% vs. 6.7%) and pigmentary abnormalities (4.9% vs. 1.7%). Eyes with soft indistinct drusen or retinal pigmentary abnormalities at baseline, were more likely to develop late age-related macular degeneration at follow-up than eyes without these lesions (15.1% vs. 0.4% and 20.0% vs. 0.8%, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: These population-based estimates document the high incidence of signs of age-related maculopathy in people 75 years of age or older. Our findings demonstrate that large numbers of hard drusen predict the incidence of soft drusen and pigmentary abnormalities and that the presence of the latter lesions significantly increases the risk for the development of geographic atrophy and exudative macular degeneration.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12359593     DOI: 10.1016/s0161-6420(02)01146-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmology        ISSN: 0161-6420            Impact factor:   12.079


  154 in total

1.  A whole-genome screen of a quantitative trait of age-related maculopathy in sibships from the Beaver Dam Eye Study.

Authors:  James H Schick; Sudha K Iyengar; Barbara E Klein; Ronald Klein; Karlie Reading; Rachel Liptak; Christopher Millard; Kristine E Lee; Sandra C Tomany; Emily L Moore; Bonnie A Fijal; Robert C Elston
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2003-04-24       Impact factor: 11.025

2.  Dissection of genomewide-scan data in extended families reveals a major locus and oligogenic susceptibility for age-related macular degeneration.

Authors:  Sudha K Iyengar; Danhong Song; Barbara E K Klein; Ronald Klein; James H Schick; Jennifer Humphrey; Christopher Millard; Rachel Liptak; Karlie Russo; Gyungah Jun; Kristine E Lee; Bonnie Fijal; Robert C Elston
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2003-12-19       Impact factor: 11.025

3.  Vitamins E and C and medical record-confirmed age-related macular degeneration in a randomized trial of male physicians.

Authors:  William G Christen; Robert J Glynn; Howard D Sesso; Tobias Kurth; Jean Macfadyen; Vadim Bubes; Julie E Buring; Joann E Manson; J Michael Gaziano
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2012-04-13       Impact factor: 12.079

Review 4.  Animal models of age related macular degeneration.

Authors:  Mark E Pennesi; Martha Neuringer; Robert J Courtney
Journal:  Mol Aspects Med       Date:  2012-06-15

Review 5.  The electroretinogram: a useful tool for evaluating age-related macular disease?

Authors:  Emma J Berrow; Hannah E Bartlett; Frank Eperjesi; Jonathan M Gibson
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-03-16       Impact factor: 2.379

6.  Quantitative classification of eyes with and without intermediate age-related macular degeneration using optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Sina Farsiu; Stephanie J Chiu; Rachelle V O'Connell; Francisco A Folgar; Eric Yuan; Joseph A Izatt; Cynthia A Toth
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2013-08-29       Impact factor: 12.079

7.  [Association between classic cardiovascular risk factors and age-related maculopathy (ARM). Results of the baseline examination of the Münster Aging and Retina Study (MARS)].

Authors:  B Dasch; A Fuhs; A Meister; T Behrens; K Krause; D Pauleikhoff; H W Hense
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 1.059

8.  Serum levels of macular carotenoids in relation to age-related maculopathy: the Muenster Aging and Retina Study (MARS).

Authors:  Burkhard Dasch; Andrea Fuhs; Joachim Schmidt; Thomas Behrens; Astrid Meister; Juergen Wellmann; Manfred Fobker; Daniel Pauleikhoff; Hans-Werner Hense
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2005-10-20       Impact factor: 3.117

9.  Misclassification can explain most apparent regression of age-related macular degeneration: results from multistate models with misclassification.

Authors:  Ronald E Gangnon; Kristine E Lee; Barbara E K Klein; Sudha K Iyengar; Theru A Sivakumaran; Ronald Klein
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2014-03-20       Impact factor: 4.799

10.  Risk alleles in CFH and ARMS2 and the long-term natural history of age-related macular degeneration: the Beaver Dam Eye Study.

Authors:  Ronald Klein; Chelsea E Myers; Stacy M Meuer; Ronald E Gangnon; Theru A Sivakumaran; Sudha K Iyengar; Kristine E Lee; Barbara E K Klein
Journal:  JAMA Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 7.389

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.