Literature DB >> 27595583

Current Practice of Duodenoscope Reprocessing.

Stephen Kim1, V Raman Muthusamy2.   

Abstract

Numerous outbreaks of duodenoscope-associated transmission of multi-drug resistant bacteria have recently been reported. Unlike prior episodes of endoscope-transmitted infections, the latest outbreaks have occurred despite strict adherence to duodenoscope reprocessing guidelines. The current standard for all flexible endoscope reprocessing includes pre-cleaning, leak testing, an additional manual cleaning step, and high-level disinfection. When these steps are strictly followed, the risk of infection transmission during endoscopy is exceedingly rare. However, due to its complex design, the duodenoscope may not be able to be adequately disinfected using the current reprocessing standards. Supplemental measures to enhance scope reprocessing have subsequently been recommended to reduce the infection risk in patients undergoing endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. These methods are likely short-term solutions that have yet to be validated regarded their effectiveness. Additional approaches to monitor the quality of duodenoscope reprocessing may also be useful. Ultimately, a definitive, yet logistically feasible, method of duodenoscope reprocessing is required to ensure the safety of our patients.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Carbapenem-resistant enterobacteriaceae; Duodenoscope; Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography; Outbreak; Reprocessing

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27595583     DOI: 10.1007/s11894-016-0528-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep        ISSN: 1522-8037


  21 in total

Review 1.  Establishing the shelf life of flexible colonoscopes.

Authors:  Robin Riley; Christine Beanland; Henk Bos
Journal:  Gastroenterol Nurs       Date:  2002 May-Jun       Impact factor: 0.978

2.  Reported gastrointestinal endoscope reprocessing lapses: the tip of the iceberg.

Authors:  Alexandra M Dirlam Langlay; Cori L Ofstead; Natalie J Mueller; Pritish K Tosh; Todd H Baron; Harry P Wetzler
Journal:  Am J Infect Control       Date:  2013-09-08       Impact factor: 2.918

3.  ERCP scopes: what can we do to prevent infections?

Authors:  William A Rutala; David J Weber
Journal:  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 3.254

4.  A quarantine process for the resolution of duodenoscope-associated transmission of multidrug-resistant Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Andrew S Ross; Christopher Baliga; Punam Verma; Jeffrey Duchin; Michael Gluck
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2015-06-16       Impact factor: 9.427

5.  Impact of ethylene oxide gas sterilization of duodenoscopes after a carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae outbreak.

Authors:  Igor Naryzhny; Dean Silas; Kenneth Chi
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2016-02-05       Impact factor: 9.427

6.  New Delhi metallo-β-lactamase-producing carbapenem-resistant Escherichia coli associated with exposure to duodenoscopes.

Authors:  Lauren Epstein; Jennifer C Hunter; M Allison Arwady; Victoria Tsai; Linda Stein; Marguerite Gribogiannis; Mabel Frias; Alice Y Guh; Alison S Laufer; Stephanie Black; Massimo Pacilli; Heather Moulton-Meissner; J Kamile Rasheed; Johannetsy J Avillan; Brandon Kitchel; Brandi M Limbago; Duncan MacCannell; David Lonsway; Judith Noble-Wang; Judith Conway; Craig Conover; Michael Vernon; Alexander J Kallen
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2014-10-08       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Worst-case soiling levels for patient-used flexible endoscopes before and after cleaning.

Authors:  M J Alfa; P Degagne; N Olson
Journal:  Am J Infect Control       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 2.918

8.  Aldehyde-resistant mycobacteria bacteria associated with the use of endoscope reprocessing systems.

Authors:  Christopher W Fisher; Anthony Fiorello; Diana Shaffer; Mary Jackson; Gerald E McDonnell
Journal:  Am J Infect Control       Date:  2012-02-10       Impact factor: 2.918

9.  Validation of adenosine triphosphate to audit manual cleaning of flexible endoscope channels.

Authors:  Michelle J Alfa; Iram Fatima; Nancy Olson
Journal:  Am J Infect Control       Date:  2012-09-11       Impact factor: 2.918

Review 10.  Transmission of infection by flexible gastrointestinal endoscopy and bronchoscopy.

Authors:  Julia Kovaleva; Frans T M Peters; Henny C van der Mei; John E Degener
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 26.132

View more
  6 in total

1.  Rate and impact of duodenoscope contamination: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Sara Larsen; Rasmus Vinther Russell; Lotte Klinten Ockert; Stephen Spanos; Helena Strømstad Travis; Lars Holger Ehlers; Anders Mærkedahl
Journal:  EClinicalMedicine       Date:  2020-07-15

2.  Sterile Reverse Osmosis Water Combined with Friction Are Optimal for Channel and Lever Cavity Sample Collection of Flexible Duodenoscopes.

Authors:  Michelle J Alfa; Harminder Singh; Zoann Nugent; Donald Duerksen; Gale Schultz; Carol Reidy; Patricia DeGagne; Nancy Olson
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2017-11-07

3.  The future of ERCP.

Authors:  Richard A Kozarek
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2017-04

4.  Plasma-activated water: a new and effective alternative for duodenoscope reprocessing.

Authors:  Gheorghe G Bălan; Irina Roşca; Elena-Laura Ursu; Florica Doroftei; Andra-Cristina Bostănaru; Eugen Hnatiuc; Valentin Năstasă; Vasile Şandru; Gabriela Ştefănescu; Anca Trifan; Mihai Mareş
Journal:  Infect Drug Resist       Date:  2018-05-17       Impact factor: 4.003

5.  Worldwide practices on flexible endoscope reprocessing.

Authors:  N Kenters; E Tartari; J Hopman; Rehab H El-Sokkary; M Nagao; K Marimuthu; M C Vos; E G W Huijskens; Andreas Voss
Journal:  Antimicrob Resist Infect Control       Date:  2018-12-17       Impact factor: 4.887

Review 6.  A narrative review on current duodenoscope reprocessing techniques and novel developments.

Authors:  Maarten Heuvelmans; Herman F Wunderink; Henny C van der Mei; Jan F Monkelbaan
Journal:  Antimicrob Resist Infect Control       Date:  2021-12-23       Impact factor: 4.887

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.