Literature DB >> 10511485

Worst-case soiling levels for patient-used flexible endoscopes before and after cleaning.

M J Alfa1, P Degagne, N Olson.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The soiling levels of patient-used narrow-lumened flexible endoscopes were assessed for bronchoscopes, duodenoscopes, and colonoscopes. The effect of cleaning on the soil composition and concentration was evaluated.
DESIGN: Suction channels from 10 each of bronchoscopes, duodenoscopes used for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, and colonoscopes were assessed immediately after patient use for the levels of bilirubin, hemoglobin, protein, sodium ion, carbohydrate, endotoxin, and viable bacteria. Another 10 suction channels of each type of endoscope were evaluated for the same components after routine cleaning but before processing by high-level disinfection or sterilization for subsequent clinical use.
RESULTS: Recognizing that only soluble components could be quantified, the worst-case soil levels in the suction channels (the average surface area of these channels was 45.6 cm(2), 149.8 cm,(2) and 192.0 cm(2) for bronchoscopes, duodenoscopes, and colonoscopes, respectively) were protein 115 microg/cm(2), sodium ion 7.4 micromol/cm(2), hemoglobin 85 microg/cm(2), bilirubin 299 nmol/cm(2), carbohydrate 29.1 microg/cm(2), endotoxin 9852 endotoxin units/cm(2), and bacteria 7.1 (log(10)) colony-forming units (CFU)/cm(2). Colonoscopes had 4 to 5 times greater soiling on average compared with the other endoscope types. Routine cleaning reduced the levels of bilirubin to below the limits of detection for all endoscopes evaluated (limits of detection were <1 nmol/mL). After cleaning, residual hemoglobin was detectable in bronchoscopes only. After cleaning, the levels of protein, endotoxin, and sodium ion all were reduced fivefold to tenfold for all types of endoscopes. Carbohydrate was reduced to lower than the limit of detection for all endoscopes after cleaning, except the duodenoscopes. The average load of viable bacteria was reduced from 3 log(10) to 5 log(10) CFU/cm(2) (which represents 5.9-9.5 log(10) CFU/endoscope channel) after patient use to approximately 2 log(10) CFU/cm(2) (which represents 3.2-5.3 log(10) CFU/endoscope channel) after cleaning.
CONCLUSIONS: These data demonstrated that cleaning effectively reduced or eliminated many components of soil, but a substantial amount of viable bacteria and protein remained. Hemoglobin levels in before samples indicated that blood was not present in high concentrations in the suction channels of the majority of flexible endoscope samples. Soil that mimics the worst-case composition from patient-used endoscopes would be ideal for simulated-use studies for such medical devices.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10511485     DOI: 10.1016/s0196-6553(99)70004-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Infect Control        ISSN: 0196-6553            Impact factor:   2.918


  13 in total

1.  Assessment on experimental bacterial biofilms and in clinical practice of the efficacy of sampling solutions for microbiological testing of endoscopes.

Authors:  C Aumeran; E Thibert; F A Chapelle; C Hennequin; O Lesens; O Traoré
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2011-12-14       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 2.  Superbugs on Duodenoscopes: the Challenge of Cleaning and Disinfection of Reusable Devices.

Authors:  Romney M Humphries; Gerald McDonnell
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2015-07-22       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 3.  Is peracetic acid suitable for the cleaning step of reprocessing flexible endoscopes?

Authors:  Günter Kampf; Patricia M Fliss; Heike Martiny
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2014-09-16

Review 4.  Current Practice of Duodenoscope Reprocessing.

Authors:  Stephen Kim; V Raman Muthusamy
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2016-10

5.  Turbulent fluid flow is a novel closed-system sample extraction method for flexible endoscope channels of various inner diameters.

Authors:  Seo Yean Sohn; Michelle J Alfa; Richard Lai; Yacoob Tabani; Mohamed E Labib
Journal:  J Microbiol Methods       Date:  2019-11-20       Impact factor: 2.363

6.  EVOTECH endoscope cleaner and reprocessor (ECR) simulated-use and clinical-use evaluation of cleaning efficacy.

Authors:  Michelle J Alfa; Pat DeGagne; Nancy Olson; Iram Fatima
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2010-07-09       Impact factor: 3.090

7.  Thermal Disinfection Validation: The Relationship Between A0 and Microbial Reduction.

Authors:  Terra A Kremer; Gerald McDonnell; Emily Mitzel; Nupur Jain; Henri Hubert; Klaus Roth; Philippe Labrie; Alex Villella
Journal:  Biomed Instrum Technol       Date:  2021-07-01

8.  Escherichia coli morphological changes and lipid A removal induced by reduced pressure nitrogen afterglow exposure.

Authors:  Hayat Zerrouki; Virginie Rizzati; Corinne Bernis; Anne Nègre-Salvayre; Jean Philippe Sarrette; Sarah Cousty
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-02       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Modeling microbial survival in buildup biofilm for complex medical devices.

Authors:  Michelle J Alfa; Rosemarie Howie
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2009-05-08       Impact factor: 3.090

10.  Enzymes Enhance Biofilm Removal Efficiency of Cleaners.

Authors:  Philipp Stiefel; Stefan Mauerhofer; Jana Schneider; Katharina Maniura-Weber; Urs Rosenberg; Qun Ren
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2016-05-23       Impact factor: 5.191

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.