Literature DB >> 26092616

A quarantine process for the resolution of duodenoscope-associated transmission of multidrug-resistant Escherichia coli.

Andrew S Ross1, Christopher Baliga1, Punam Verma1, Jeffrey Duchin2, Michael Gluck1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Because of their complex design, duodenoscopes have been long recognized to be difficult to fully disinfect and may play a role in transmission of bacteria between patients. Recent reports of duodenoscope-associated carbapenem-resistant enterobacteriaceae transmission have confirmed these suspicions. An outbreak of a multidrug resistant strain of Escherichia coli was recently reported at our institution. Herein we report the results of our investigation and the process improvements that we deployed in an effort to contain the outbreak.
METHODS: A full investigation into the environment, endoscopists, infection control practices, high-level disinfection process as well as endoscopes was undertaken in conjunction with the local county health authority and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Duodenoscopes were cultured and quarantined for 48 hours until negative cultures were obtained. Ergonomic changes were made to the endoscope reprocessing area, duodenoscopes were returned for routine maintenance, and surveillance cultures were obtained from all patients undergoing ERCP.
RESULTS: Between November 2012 and August 2013, 32 patients were found to harbor 1 of 2 clonal strains of multidrug-resistant E coli, all of whom had undergone ERCP or duodenoscopy. A total of 1149 ERCPs were performed during this time period. Seven patients died within 31 days of the organism being identified in culture, 16 patients died overall by March 2015. The exact contribution of E coli to death is unclear because most patients had underlying late-stage malignancy or other severe medical comorbidities. No breach in high-level disinfection protocol or infection control practices was identified. The clonal strain of E coli was identified in culture on 4 of 8 duodenoscopes, 3 of which required critical repairs despite lack of obvious malfunction. The defect rate in high-level disinfection of duodenoscopes was 2% over a 1-year period. The implemented quality improvements, subsequent to which 1625 ERCPs have been performed, were successful in halting the outbreak.
CONCLUSIONS: The existing manufacturer-recommended high-level disinfection protocols for duodenoscopes are inadequate. Although the ultimate solution may be a design change to the instrument, the timeline for such a change appears long and potentially difficult to exact. In the interim, a reliable method to ensure that bacterial pathogens are not present on the duodenoscope after high-level disinfection is needed.
Copyright © 2015 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26092616     DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2015.04.036

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc        ISSN: 0016-5107            Impact factor:   9.427


  34 in total

Review 1.  Duodenoscope-Associated Infections: Update on an Emerging Problem.

Authors:  M Rubayat Rahman; Abhilash Perisetti; Roxana Coman; Pardeep Bansal; Rajiv Chhabra; Hemant Goyal
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2018-12-19       Impact factor: 3.199

2.  Scoping the scope: endoscopic evaluation of endoscope working channels with a new high-resolution inspection endoscope (with video).

Authors:  Monique T Barakat; Mohit Girotra; Robert J Huang; Subhas Banerjee
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2018-02-06       Impact factor: 9.427

Review 3.  Duodenoscope-Associated Bacterial Infections: A Review and Update.

Authors:  Jennifer T Higa; Michael Gluck; Andrew S Ross
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-06

Review 4.  Current Practice of Duodenoscope Reprocessing.

Authors:  Stephen Kim; V Raman Muthusamy
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2016-10

5.  Next-Generation Epidemiology: Using Real-Time Core Genome Multilocus Sequence Typing To Support Infection Control Policy.

Authors:  John P Dekker; Karen M Frank
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2016-09-14       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 6.  Hygiene: The Looming Achilles Heel in Endoscopy.

Authors:  Michael Jung; Ulrike Beilenhoff
Journal:  Visc Med       Date:  2016-02-10

Review 7.  Software Tools in Endoscopy - Nice to Have or Essential?

Authors:  Oliver Möschler
Journal:  Visc Med       Date:  2016-01-29

8.  Eliminating Duodenoscope-Associated Transmission of Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE): In Search of an Optimal Strategy.

Authors:  Divyanshoo R Kohli; Thomas E Grys; Rahul Pannala
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 9.  Duodenoscope-associated infections: a review.

Authors:  Gheorghe G Balan; Catalin Victor Sfarti; Stefan Andrei Chiriac; Carol Stanciu; Anca Trifan
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2019-09-03       Impact factor: 3.267

10.  Adenosine triphosphate bioluminescence for bacteriologic surveillance and reprocessing strategies for minimizing risk of infection transmission by duodenoscopes.

Authors:  Saurabh Sethi; Robert J Huang; Monique T Barakat; Niaz Banaei; Shai Friedland; Subhas Banerjee
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2016-11-03       Impact factor: 9.427

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.