Literature DB >> 27592710

Multivariate two-part statistics for analysis of correlated mass spectrometry data from multiple biological specimens.

Sandra L Taylor1, L Renee Ruhaak2, Robert H Weiss3, Karen Kelly4, Kyoungmi Kim1.   

Abstract

MOTIVATION: High through-put mass spectrometry (MS) is now being used to profile small molecular compounds across multiple biological sample types from the same subjects with the goal of leveraging information across biospecimens. Multivariate statistical methods that combine information from all biospecimens could be more powerful than the usual univariate analyses. However, missing values are common in MS data and imputation can impact between-biospecimen correlation and multivariate analysis results.
RESULTS: We propose two multivariate two-part statistics that accommodate missing values and combine data from all biospecimens to identify differentially regulated compounds. Statistical significance is determined using a multivariate permutation null distribution. Relative to univariate tests, the multivariate procedures detected more significant compounds in three biological datasets. In a simulation study, we showed that multi-biospecimen testing procedures were more powerful than single-biospecimen methods when compounds are differentially regulated in multiple biospecimens but univariate methods can be more powerful if compounds are differentially regulated in only one biospecimen.
AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: We provide R functions to implement and illustrate our method as supplementary information CONTACT: sltaylor@ucdavis.eduSupplementary information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
© The Author 2016. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27592710      PMCID: PMC6075023          DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btw578

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bioinformatics        ISSN: 1367-4803            Impact factor:   6.937


  21 in total

1.  Kidney tumor biomarkers revealed by simultaneous multiple matrix metabolomics analysis.

Authors:  Sheila Ganti; Sandra L Taylor; Omran Abu Aboud; Joy Yang; Christopher Evans; Michael V Osier; Danny C Alexander; Kyoungmi Kim; Robert H Weiss
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2012-05-24       Impact factor: 12.701

2.  The influence of missing value imputation on detection of differentially expressed genes from microarray data.

Authors:  Ida Scheel; Magne Aldrin; Ingrid K Glad; Ragnhild Sørum; Heidi Lyng; Arnoldo Frigessi
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2005-10-10       Impact factor: 6.937

3.  Serum and tissue metabolomics of head and neck cancer.

Authors:  Koichiro Yonezawa; Shin Nishiumi; Shin Nishiumii; Junko Kitamoto-Matsuda; Takeshi Fujita; Koichi Morimoto; Daisuke Yamashita; Miki Saito; Naoki Otsuki; Yasuhiro Irino; Masakazu Shinohara; Masaru Yoshida; Ken-ichi Nibu
Journal:  Cancer Genomics Proteomics       Date:  2013 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 4.069

4.  A statistical framework for protein quantitation in bottom-up MS-based proteomics.

Authors:  Yuliya Karpievitch; Jeff Stanley; Thomas Taverner; Jianhua Huang; Joshua N Adkins; Charles Ansong; Fred Heffron; Thomas O Metz; Wei-Jun Qian; Hyunjin Yoon; Richard D Smith; Alan R Dabney
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2009-06-17       Impact factor: 6.937

5.  Effects of imputation on correlation: implications for analysis of mass spectrometry data from multiple biological matrices.

Authors:  Sandra L Taylor; L Renee Ruhaak; Karen Kelly; Robert H Weiss; Kyoungmi Kim
Journal:  Brief Bioinform       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 11.622

6.  Evaluation of glycomic profiling as a diagnostic biomarker for epithelial ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Kyoungmi Kim; L Renee Ruhaak; Uyen Thao Nguyen; Sandra L Taylor; Lauren Dimapasoc; Cynthia Williams; Carol Stroble; Sureyya Ozcan; Suzanne Miyamoto; Carlito B Lebrilla; Gary S Leiserowitz
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2014-02-20       Impact factor: 4.254

7.  Accounting for undetected compounds in statistical analyses of mass spectrometry 'omic studies.

Authors:  Sandra L Taylor; Gary S Leiserowitz; Kyoungmi Kim
Journal:  Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol       Date:  2013-12

8.  Comparison of squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma of the lung by metabolomic analysis of tissue-serum pairs.

Authors:  K W Jordan; C B Adkins; L Su; E F Halpern; E J Mark; D C Christiani; L L Cheng
Journal:  Lung Cancer       Date:  2009-06-25       Impact factor: 5.705

9.  Metabolomic biomarkers in serum and urine in women with preeclampsia.

Authors:  Marie Austdal; Ragnhild Bergene Skråstad; Astrid Solberg Gundersen; Rigmor Austgulen; Ann-Charlotte Iversen; Tone Frost Bathen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-17       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  A four-compartment metabolomics analysis of the liver, muscle, serum, and urine response to polytrauma with hemorrhagic shock following carbohydrate prefeed.

Authors:  Nancy Witowski; Elizabeth Lusczek; Charles Determan; Daniel Lexcen; Kristine Mulier; Beverly Ostrowski; Greg Beilman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-14       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  2 in total

1.  Joint Bounding of Peaks Across Samples Improves Differential Analysis in Mass Spectrometry-Based Metabolomics.

Authors:  Leslie Myint; Andre Kleensang; Liang Zhao; Thomas Hartung; Kasper D Hansen
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2017-03-07       Impact factor: 6.986

2.  Imputation of Missing Values for Multi-Biospecimen Metabolomics Studies: Bias and Effects on Statistical Validity.

Authors:  Machelle D Wilson; Matthew D Ponzini; Sandra L Taylor; Kyoungmi Kim
Journal:  Metabolites       Date:  2022-07-21
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.