Michael G Usher1, Christine Fanning2, Di Wu2, Christine Muglia2, Karen Balonze2, Deborah Kim3, Amay Parikh4, Dana Herrigel2. 1. Department of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN 55455. Electronic address: mgusher@umn.edu. 2. Department of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, Rutgers, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ 08901. 3. Department of Medicine, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA 02118. 4. Department of Medicine, Divisions of Nephrology and Critical Care, Rutgers, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ 08901.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Patients transferred between hospitals are at high risk of adverse events and mortality. This study aims to identify which components of the transfer handoff process are important predictors of adverse events and mortality. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective, observational study of 335 consecutive patient transfers to 3 intensive care units at an academic tertiary referral center. We assessed the relationship between handoff documentation completeness and patient outcomes. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes included adverse events, duplication of labor, disposition error, and length of stay. RESULTS: Transfer documentation was frequently absent with overall completeness of 58.3%. Adverse events occurred in 42% of patients within 24 hours of arrival, with an overall in-hospital mortality of 17.3%. Higher documentation completeness was associated with reduced in-hospital mortality (odds ratio [OR], 0.07; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.02 to 0.38; P = .002), reduced adverse events (coefficient, -2.08; 95% CI, -2.76 to -1.390; P < .001), and reduced duplication of labor (OR, 0.19; 95% CI, 0.04 to 0.88; P = .033) when controlling for severity of illness. CONCLUSIONS: Documentation completeness is associated with improved outcomes and resource utilization in patients transferred between hospitals.
PURPOSE:Patients transferred between hospitals are at high risk of adverse events and mortality. This study aims to identify which components of the transfer handoff process are important predictors of adverse events and mortality. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective, observational study of 335 consecutive patient transfers to 3 intensive care units at an academic tertiary referral center. We assessed the relationship between handoff documentation completeness and patient outcomes. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes included adverse events, duplication of labor, disposition error, and length of stay. RESULTS: Transfer documentation was frequently absent with overall completeness of 58.3%. Adverse events occurred in 42% of patients within 24 hours of arrival, with an overall in-hospital mortality of 17.3%. Higher documentation completeness was associated with reduced in-hospital mortality (odds ratio [OR], 0.07; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.02 to 0.38; P = .002), reduced adverse events (coefficient, -2.08; 95% CI, -2.76 to -1.390; P < .001), and reduced duplication of labor (OR, 0.19; 95% CI, 0.04 to 0.88; P = .033) when controlling for severity of illness. CONCLUSIONS: Documentation completeness is associated with improved outcomes and resource utilization in patients transferred between hospitals.
Authors: G D Vos; F H M Nieman; A M B Meurs; D A Van Waardenburg; G Ramsay; R A M G Donckerwolcke Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2003-07-17 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Karim D Mahmoud; Youlan L Gu; Maarten W Nijsten; Ronald de Vos; Wybe Nieuwland; Felix Zijlstra; Hans L Hillege; Iwan C van der Horst; Bart Jgl de Smet Journal: Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care Date: 2013-06
Authors: Hans Morten Lossius; Thomas Kristiansen; Kjetil G Ringdal; Marius Rehn Journal: Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med Date: 2010-03-16 Impact factor: 2.953
Authors: Amy J Starmer; Theodore C Sectish; Dennis W Simon; Carol Keohane; Maireade E McSweeney; Erica Y Chung; Catherine S Yoon; Stuart R Lipsitz; Ari J Wassner; Marvin B Harper; Christopher P Landrigan Journal: JAMA Date: 2013-12-04 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Monica K Lieng; Heather M Siefkes; Jennifer L Rosenthal; Hadley S Sauers-Ford; Jamie L Mouzoon; Ilana S Sigal; Parul Dayal; Shelby T Chen; Cheryl L McBeth; Sandie Dial; Genevieve Dizon; Haley E Dannewitz; Kiersten Kozycz; Torryn L Jennings-Hill; Jennifer M Martinson; Julia K Huerta; Emily A Pons; Nicole Vance; Breanna N Warnock; James P Marcin Journal: Pediatr Crit Care Med Date: 2019-09 Impact factor: 3.624
Authors: Jennifer L Rosenthal; Oluseun Atolagbe; Michelle Y Hamline; Su-Ting T Li; Alexis Toney; Jessica Witkowski; Heather McKnight; Daniel J Tancredi; Patrick S Romano Journal: Am J Med Qual Date: 2019-06-10 Impact factor: 1.852
Authors: Michael Usher; Nishant Sahni; Dana Herrigel; Gyorgy Simon; Genevieve B Melton; Anne Joseph; Andrew Olson Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2018-05-29 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: James A Hall; Shamyal H Khan; Courtney Shaver; Kendall Pye; Ismail Salejee; Thomas Delmas; Badri Giri; Heath D White; Curtis Mirkes Journal: Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent) Date: 2019-07-30
Authors: David P Stonko; Bradley M Dennis; Rachael A Callcut; Richard D Betzold; Michael C Smith; Andrew J Medvecz; Oscar D Guillamondegui Journal: PLoS One Date: 2018-12-03 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Michael G Usher; Christopher J Tignanelli; Brian Hilliard; Zachary P Kaltenborn; Monica I Lupei; Gyorgy Simon; Surbhi Shah; Jonathan D Kirsch; Genevieve B Melton; Nicholas E Ingraham; Andrew P J Olson; Karyn D Baum Journal: J Patient Saf Date: 2021-09-27 Impact factor: 2.243
Authors: Michael G Usher; Christine Fanning; Vivian W Fang; Madeline Carroll; Amay Parikh; Anne Joseph; Dana Herrigel Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2018-10-01 Impact factor: 6.473