Literature DB >> 12879238

Problems in interhospital pediatric intensive care transport in The Netherlands: results from a survey of general pediatricians.

G D Vos1, F H M Nieman, A M B Meurs, D A Van Waardenburg, G Ramsay, R A M G Donckerwolcke.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Interhospital pediatric intensive care transport accompanied by non-trained specialists usually occurs with inadequate equipment and has been associated with high incidence of complications. These facts have serious consequences for patients but also can be very disconcerting for specialists. This survey was undertaken to gain insight into the problems encountered in organizing pediatric intensive care transport in The Netherlands to measure the specialist's satisfaction or dissatisfaction with the current state of affairs in the organization of such transports, and additional workload and feelings of insecurity experienced during self-organized transports.
DESIGN: Survey, retrospective.
SETTING: A postal questionnaire sent to all pediatricians of community hospitals in The Netherlands.
METHODS: Results of direct questioning are given as discrete frequencies. After factor and reliability analysis 5-point Likert scale items are summed up in scale constructions. Relationships between scales are examined in regression analysis.
RESULTS: Pediatricians appear to be satisfied with current specialist retrieval teams if these teams are available in their region, and highly dissatisfied if not available. Many nontrained specialists consider these transports burdening tasks with a high workload, and they feel insecure during these transports, especially if they report lack of knowledge of the transport equipment.
CONCLUSIONS: The need for pediatric specialist retrieval teams in The Netherlands is seen not only in the insufficient level of care delivered by accompanying nontrained specialists and the reported high incidence of complications as shown in the literature but also in the dissatisfaction and high stress of these specialists.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12879238     DOI: 10.1007/s00134-003-1889-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Intensive Care Med        ISSN: 0342-4642            Impact factor:   17.440


  8 in total

1.  Should paediatric intensive care be centralised? Trent versus Victoria.

Authors:  G Pearson; F Shann; P Barry; J Vyas; D Thomas; C Powell; D Field
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1997-04-26       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  Reduction in case fatality rate from meningococcal disease associated with improved healthcare delivery.

Authors:  R Booy; P Habibi; S Nadel; C de Munter; J Britto; A Morrison; M Levin
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 3.791

3.  Centralisation of paediatric intensive care to improve outcome.

Authors:  R J Gemke
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1997-04-26       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Comparison of a specialist retrieval team with current United Kingdom practice for the transport of critically ill patients.

Authors:  G Bellingan; T Olivier; S Batson; A Webb
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 17.440

5.  Improved outcomes from tertiary center pediatric intensive care: a statewide comparison of tertiary and nontertiary care facilities.

Authors:  M M Pollack; S R Alexander; N Clarke; U E Ruttimann; H M Tesselaar; A C Bachulis
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 7.598

6.  Morbidity and severity of illness during interhospital transfer: impact of a specialised paediatric retrieval team.

Authors:  J Britto; S Nadel; I Maconochie; M Levin; P Habibi
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1995-09-30

7.  Adverse events occurring during interhospital transfer of the critically ill.

Authors:  P W Barry; C Ralston
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 3.791

8.  Comparative assessment of pediatric intensive care: a national multicenter study. Pediatric Intensive Care Assessment of Outcome (PICASSO) Study Group.

Authors:  R J Gemke; G J Bonsel
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 7.598

  8 in total
  6 in total

1.  Transport of seriously ill children: a neglected global issue.

Authors:  Trevor Duke
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 2.  Year in review in intensive care medicine-2003. Part 3: intensive care unit organization, scoring, quality of life, ethics, neonatal and pediatrics, and experimental.

Authors:  Edward Abraham; Peter Andrews; Massimo Antonelli; Laurent Brochard; Christian Brun-Buisson; Geoffrey Dobb; Jean-Yves Fagon; Johan Groeneveld; Jordi Mancebo; Philipp Metnitz; Stefano Nava; Michael Pinsky; Peter Radermacher; Marco Ranieri; Christian Richard; Robert Tasker; Benoit Vallet
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2004-06-26       Impact factor: 17.440

3.  Diagnostic Discordance, Health Information Exchange, and Inter-Hospital Transfer Outcomes: a Population Study.

Authors:  Michael Usher; Nishant Sahni; Dana Herrigel; Gyorgy Simon; Genevieve B Melton; Anne Joseph; Andrew Olson
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2018-05-29       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  Information handoff and outcomes of critically ill patients transferred between hospitals.

Authors:  Michael G Usher; Christine Fanning; Di Wu; Christine Muglia; Karen Balonze; Deborah Kim; Amay Parikh; Dana Herrigel
Journal:  J Crit Care       Date:  2016-08-10       Impact factor: 3.425

Review 5.  Transferring the critically ill patient: are we there yet?

Authors:  Joep M Droogh; Marije Smit; Anthony R Absalom; Jack J M Ligtenberg; Jan G Zijlstra
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2015-02-20       Impact factor: 9.097

6. 

Authors:  Martin C J Kneyber
Journal:  Crit Care (Houten)       Date:  2006
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.