OBJECTIVE: To compare nurse preparedness and quality of patient handoff during interfacility transfers from a pretransfer emergency department to a PICU when conducted over telemedicine versus telephone. DESIGN: Cross-sectional nurse survey linked with patient electronic medical record data using multivariable, multilevel analysis. SETTING: Tertiary PICU within an academic children's hospital. PARTICIPANTS: PICU nurses who received a patient handoff between October 2017 and July 2018. INTERVENTIONS: None. MAIN RESULTS AND MEASUREMENTS: Among 239 eligible transfers, 106 surveys were completed by 55 nurses (44% survey response rate). Telemedicine was used for 30 handoffs (28%), and telephone was used for 76 handoffs (72%). Patients were comparable with respect to age, sex, race, primary spoken language, and insurance, but handoffs conducted over telemedicine involved patients with higher illness severity as measured by the Pediatric Risk of Mortality III score (4.4 vs 1.9; p = 0.05). After adjusting for Pediatric Risk of Mortality III score, survey recall time, and residual clustering by nurse, receiving nurses reported higher preparedness (measured on a five-point adjectival scale) following telemedicine handoffs compared with telephone handoffs (3.4 vs 3.1; p = 0.02). There were no statistically significant differences in both bivariable and multivariable analyses of handoff quality as measured by the Handoff Clinical Evaluation Exercise. Handoffs using telemedicine were associated with increased number of Illness severity, Patient summary, Action list, Situation awareness and contingency planning, Synthesis by receiver components (3.3 vs 2.8; p = 0.04), but this difference was not significant in the adjusted analysis (3.1 vs 2.9; p = 0.55). CONCLUSIONS: Telemedicine is feasible for nurse-to-nurse handoffs of critically ill patients between pretransfer and receiving facilities and may be associated with increased perceived and objective nurse preparedness upon patient arrival. Additional research is needed to demonstrate that telemedicine during nurse handoffs improves communication, decreases preventable adverse events, and impacts family and provider satisfaction.
OBJECTIVE: To compare nurse preparedness and quality of patient handoff during interfacility transfers from a pretransfer emergency department to a PICU when conducted over telemedicine versus telephone. DESIGN: Cross-sectional nurse survey linked with patient electronic medical record data using multivariable, multilevel analysis. SETTING: Tertiary PICU within an academic children's hospital. PARTICIPANTS: PICU nurses who received a patient handoff between October 2017 and July 2018. INTERVENTIONS: None. MAIN RESULTS AND MEASUREMENTS: Among 239 eligible transfers, 106 surveys were completed by 55 nurses (44% survey response rate). Telemedicine was used for 30 handoffs (28%), and telephone was used for 76 handoffs (72%). Patients were comparable with respect to age, sex, race, primary spoken language, and insurance, but handoffs conducted over telemedicine involved patients with higher illness severity as measured by the Pediatric Risk of Mortality III score (4.4 vs 1.9; p = 0.05). After adjusting for Pediatric Risk of Mortality III score, survey recall time, and residual clustering by nurse, receiving nurses reported higher preparedness (measured on a five-point adjectival scale) following telemedicine handoffs compared with telephone handoffs (3.4 vs 3.1; p = 0.02). There were no statistically significant differences in both bivariable and multivariable analyses of handoff quality as measured by the Handoff Clinical Evaluation Exercise. Handoffs using telemedicine were associated with increased number of Illness severity, Patient summary, Action list, Situation awareness and contingency planning, Synthesis by receiver components (3.3 vs 2.8; p = 0.04), but this difference was not significant in the adjusted analysis (3.1 vs 2.9; p = 0.55). CONCLUSIONS: Telemedicine is feasible for nurse-to-nurse handoffs of critically illpatients between pretransfer and receiving facilities and may be associated with increased perceived and objective nurse preparedness upon patient arrival. Additional research is needed to demonstrate that telemedicine during nurse handoffs improves communication, decreases preventable adverse events, and impacts family and provider satisfaction.
Authors: Jennifer L Rosenthal; Megumi J Okumura; Lenore Hernandez; Su-Ting T Li; Roberta S Rehm Journal: Acad Pediatr Date: 2016-04-22 Impact factor: 3.107
Authors: Tyler Mardis; Matt Mardis; Joshua Davis; Ellen M Justice; Stacie Riley Holdinsky; John Donnelly; Heather Ragozine-Bush; Lee Ann Riesenberg Journal: J Nurs Care Qual Date: 2016 Jan-Mar Impact factor: 1.597
Authors: Brodie Parent; Lacey N LaGrone; Mohamed T Albirair; Peter T Serina; Jonathan M Keller; Joseph Cuschieri; Erin J Addison; Lapio Choe; Genecelle B Delossantos; Cameron E Gaskill; Sarah D Moon; Jestine T MacDonald; Matthew J Stolzberg; Erik G Van Eaton; Jennifer M Zech; Patricia A Kritek Journal: JAMA Surg Date: 2018-05-01 Impact factor: 14.766
Authors: Barry Heath; Richard Salerno; Amelia Hopkins; Jeremy Hertzig; Michael Caputo Journal: Pediatr Crit Care Med Date: 2009-09 Impact factor: 3.624
Authors: Parul Dayal; Nayla M Hojman; Jamie L Kissee; Jacqueline Evans; JoAnne E Natale; Yunru Huang; Rebecca L Litman; Thomas S Nesbitt; James P Marcin Journal: Pediatr Crit Care Med Date: 2016-06 Impact factor: 3.624
Authors: Carmen E Gonzalez; Norman Brito-Dellan; Srinivas R Banala; David Rubio; Mohamed Ait Aiss; Terry W Rice; Karen Chen; Diane C Bodurka; Carmelita P Escalante Journal: Am J Med Qual Date: 2018-05-21 Impact factor: 1.852
Authors: Amy J Starmer; Theodore C Sectish; Dennis W Simon; Carol Keohane; Maireade E McSweeney; Erica Y Chung; Catherine S Yoon; Stuart R Lipsitz; Ari J Wassner; Marvin B Harper; Christopher P Landrigan Journal: JAMA Date: 2013-12-04 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Mariam T Nawas; Heather J Landau; Craig S Sauter; Catherine A Featherstone; Sheila A Kenny; Elizabeth S Rodriguez; Lauren G Johnson; Sergio A Giralt; Michael Scordo Journal: Biol Blood Marrow Transplant Date: 2020-02-15 Impact factor: 5.742