Literature DB >> 27587516

Total hip arthroplasty following failure of core decompression and tantalum rod implantation.

M Olsen1, P M Lewis2, Z Morrison1, M D McKee1, J P Waddell1, E H Schemitsch3.   

Abstract

AIMS: One method of femoral head preservation following avascular necrosis (AVN) is core decompression and insertion of a tantalum rod. However, there may be a high failure rate associated with this procedure. The purpose of this study was to document the clinical and radiological outcomes following total hip arthroplasty (THA) subsequent to failed tantalum rod insertion. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 37 failed tantalum rods requiring total hip arthroplasty were identified from a prospective database. There were 21 hips in 21 patients (12 men and nine women, mean age 37 years, 18 to 53) meeting minimum two year clinical and radiographic follow-up whose THAs were carried out between November 2002 and April 2013 (mean time between tantalum rod implantation and conversion to a THA was 26 months, 6 to 72). These were matched by age and gender to individuals (12 men, nine women, mean age 40 years, 18 to 58) receiving THA for AVN without prior tantalum rod insertion.
RESULTS: There were no functional outcome differences between the two groups. Tantalum residue was identified on all post-operative radiographs in the tantalum group. Linear wear rates were comparable between groups with no evidence of catastrophic wear in either group.
CONCLUSION: In the short term, tantalum rod implantation does not demonstrate an adverse effect on subsequent total joint replacement surgery. There is however, a high rate of retained tantalum debris on post-operative radiographs and thus there is an unknown risk of accelerated articular wear necessitating longer term study. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2016;98-B:1175-9. ©2016 The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Avascular necrosis; Tantalum rod; Total hip arthroplasty

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27587516     DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.98B9.37252

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone Joint J        ISSN: 2049-4394            Impact factor:   5.082


  10 in total

1.  What is the rate of patients undergoing a total hip arthroplasty after core decompression and insertion of a tantalum rod in osteonecrosis of the femoral head: a systematic review.

Authors:  Jean-Charles Aurégan; Benoît Villain; Thierry Bégué
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-05-04       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Efficacy of tantalum rod insertion for preventing femoral head collapse in osteonecrosis in a paediatric population: a pilot study.

Authors:  Muqtasid Hussaini; Jitendra Balakumar; David Slattery
Journal:  J Hip Preserv Surg       Date:  2021-09-25

3.  Tantalum-incorporated hydroxyapatite coating on titanium implants: its mechanical and in vitro osteogenic properties.

Authors:  Rong-Jian Lu; Xing Wang; Hui-Xia He; Ling-Ling E; Ying Li; Gui-Lan Zhang; Chuan-Jie Li; Cheng-Yun Ning; Hong-Chen Liu
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2019-10-03       Impact factor: 3.896

4.  Outcome after a new porous tantalum rod implantation for treatment of early-stage femoral head osteonecrosis.

Authors:  Wei Huang; Xuan Gong; Steve Sandiford; Xiaoqiang He; Feilong Li; Yuwan Li; Ziming Liu; Leilei Qin; Jianye Yang; Sizheng Zhu; Jiawei Wang; Xiaolin Tu; Lei Ye; Ning Hu
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2019-09

Review 5.  Nontraumatic Osteonecrosis of the Femoral Head: Where Do We Stand Today?: A 5-Year Update.

Authors:  Michael A Mont; Hytham S Salem; Nicolas S Piuzzi; Stuart B Goodman; Lynne C Jones
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2020-06-17       Impact factor: 6.558

6.  Total hip arthroplasty following failure of tantalum rod implantation for osteonecrosis of the femoral head with 5- to 10-year follow-up.

Authors:  Qi Cheng; Jin-Long Tang; Jiang-Jiang Gu; Kai-Jin Guo; Wang-Shou Guo; Bai-Liang Wang; Feng-Chao Zhao
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2018-08-16       Impact factor: 2.362

7.  The Comparative Analysis of Antegrade Versus Retrograde Approach for a Failed Porous Tantalum Rod Removal During Conversion to Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Fengchao Zhao; Li Zheng; Qi Cheng; Weifan Hu; Bailiang Wang
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2020-05-14

8.  Porous tantalum rod implantation is associated with low survival rates in patients with type C2 osteonecrosis of the femoral head but has no effect on the clinical outcome of conversion total hip arthroplasty: a retrospective study with an average 8-year follow-up.

Authors:  Mincong He; Qiushi Wei; Zhenqiu Chen; Fan Yang; Xiaojun Chen; Yi-Xian Qin; Bin Fang; Wei He
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2020-12-12       Impact factor: 2.362

Review 9.  Influence of less invasive hip preservation surgery on subsequent hip arthroplasty for osteonecrosis of the femoral head.

Authors:  Liang Mo; Jianxiong Li; Zhangzheng Wang; Fayi Huang; Pengfei Xin; Chi Zhou; Wei He; Yuhao Liu
Journal:  J Hip Preserv Surg       Date:  2022-08-03

10.  Comparison of Total Hip Arthroplasty after Two Types of Failed Hip Preserving Procedures with Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Wei Zuo; Jin-Hui Ma; Wei Cui; Wan-Shou Guo; Wei Sun
Journal:  Orthop Surg       Date:  2020-01-20       Impact factor: 2.071

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.