Literature DB >> 29728733

What is the rate of patients undergoing a total hip arthroplasty after core decompression and insertion of a tantalum rod in osteonecrosis of the femoral head: a systematic review.

Jean-Charles Aurégan1, Benoît Villain2, Thierry Bégué2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Core decompression (CD) may be effective when performed during the early stages of osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH). Tantalum may be added as a rod that would allow putting some mechanical constraints on the femoral head. We aimed to estimate the rate of total hip arthroplasty after CD and insertion of a tantalum rod during early stages of OFNH.
METHODS: We searched systematically Medline via PubMed and the Cochrane Library. Our primary endpoint was the rate of patients undergoing a total hip arthroplasty after CD and insertion of a tantalum rod. Secondary endpoints were the delay between the initial surgery and the arthroplasty, the functional improvement, and the rate of complications.
RESULTS: We included seven  studies reporting the results of 232 patients (297 hips) that were operated on by CD and insertion of a tantalum rod. At a mean follow-up of 26.97 months, 24.63% of the included hips underwent a hip arthroplasty (6-56%, SD = 17.34%). The mean delay between the initial surgery and the arthroplasty was 14.94 months (10.20-22.90; SD = 5.25), the mean improvement of Harris Hip Score was 27.66 (20.20-36.90; SD = 6.48), and the mean rate of femoral fracture was 2.43% (0-13%, SD = 4.89%).
CONCLUSION: CD and insertion of a tantalum rod may represent a solution in order to improve the mechanical support and to give a rate of conversion in arthroplasty that is acceptable.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Core decompression; Osteonecrosis of the femoral head; Tantalum rods

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29728733     DOI: 10.1007/s00264-018-3961-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Orthop        ISSN: 0341-2695            Impact factor:   3.075


  32 in total

1.  Clinical and radiological outcome of the treatment of osteonecrosis of the femoral head using the osteonecrosis intervention implant.

Authors:  Thilo Floerkemeier; Fritz Thorey; Dorothea Daentzer; Matthias Lerch; Phillip Klages; Henning Windhagen; Gabriela von Lewinski
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-01-30       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement.

Authors:  David Moher; Alessandro Liberati; Jennifer Tetzlaff; Douglas G Altman
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2009-07-23       Impact factor: 6.437

3.  Porous tantalum implant in early osteonecrosis of the hip: preliminary report on operative, survival, and outcomes results.

Authors:  Michael S Shuler; Michael D Rooks; James R Roberson
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 4.757

Review 4.  Core decompression of the osteonecrotic femoral head.

Authors:  S W Smith; T K Fehring; W L Griffin; W B Beaver
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 5.284

5.  Tantalum rod implantation and vascularized iliac grafting for osteonecrosis of the femoral head.

Authors:  Dewei Zhao; Yao Zhang; Weiming Wang; Yupeng Liu; Zhigang Li; Benjie Wang; Xiaobing Yu
Journal:  Orthopedics       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 1.390

6.  Tantalum rod implantation for femoral head osteonecrosis: survivorship analysis and determination of prognostic factors for total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Yaosheng Liu; Liang Yan; Shiguo Zhou; Xiuyun Su; Yuncen Cao; Cheng Wang; Shubin Liu
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-08-11       Impact factor: 3.075

7.  Early failures of porous tantalum osteonecrosis implants: a case series with retrieval analysis.

Authors:  Xianzuo Zhang; Jian Wang; Jun Xiao; Zhanjun Shi
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2016-01-07       Impact factor: 3.075

8.  Avascular necrosis of the femoral head: inter- and intraobserver variations of Ficat and ARCO classifications.

Authors:  Marcus Schmitt-Sody; Chlodwig Kirchhoff; Wolfgang Mayer; Michael Goebel; Volkmar Jansson
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2007-03-30       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 9.  Core decompression versus nonoperative management for osteonecrosis of the hip.

Authors:  M A Mont; J J Carbone; A C Fairbank
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Results of Total Hip Arthroplasty after Core Decompression with Tantalum Rod for Osteonecrosis of the Femoral Head.

Authors:  Gun-Woo Lee; Kyung-Soon Park; Do-Youn Kim; Young-Min Lee; Kamolhuja Eshnazarovich Eshnazarov; Taek-Rim Yoon
Journal:  Clin Orthop Surg       Date:  2016-02-13
View more
  8 in total

1.  Hip osteonecrosis: stem cells for life or behead and arthroplasty?

Authors:  Philippe Hernigou; Gildasio Daltro; Jacques Hernigou
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-06-08       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Analysis of peripheral bone reconstruction after the failure of hip osteonecrosis treatment with porous tantalum rod implantation.

Authors:  Weilu Liu; Yong Hu; Zhifa Huang; Zhanjun Shi; Jun Xiao
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2022-03-06       Impact factor: 3.479

3.  Comparison of the outcome of different bone grafts combined with modified core decompression for the treatment of ARCO II stage femoral head necrosis.

Authors:  Junming Wan; Yanqing Hu; Jiachun Li; Yuqing Zeng; Haiyong Ren
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2022-05-10       Impact factor: 3.479

4.  Repair of non-traumatic femoral head necrosis by marrow core decompression with bone grafting and porous tantalum rod implantation.

Authors:  Keyun Peng; Yu Wang; Jifeng Zhu; Chengling Li; Ziming Wang
Journal:  Pak J Med Sci       Date:  2020 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.088

5.  [Treatment of osteonecrosis of the femoral head with vascularized bone grafting].

Authors:  Haibo Ding; Yang Wang; Yun Lu
Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2021-03-15

6.  The Comparative Analysis of Antegrade Versus Retrograde Approach for a Failed Porous Tantalum Rod Removal During Conversion to Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Fengchao Zhao; Li Zheng; Qi Cheng; Weifan Hu; Bailiang Wang
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2020-05-14

7.  Porous tantalum rod implantation is associated with low survival rates in patients with type C2 osteonecrosis of the femoral head but has no effect on the clinical outcome of conversion total hip arthroplasty: a retrospective study with an average 8-year follow-up.

Authors:  Mincong He; Qiushi Wei; Zhenqiu Chen; Fan Yang; Xiaojun Chen; Yi-Xian Qin; Bin Fang; Wei He
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2020-12-12       Impact factor: 2.362

Review 8.  Influence of less invasive hip preservation surgery on subsequent hip arthroplasty for osteonecrosis of the femoral head.

Authors:  Liang Mo; Jianxiong Li; Zhangzheng Wang; Fayi Huang; Pengfei Xin; Chi Zhou; Wei He; Yuhao Liu
Journal:  J Hip Preserv Surg       Date:  2022-08-03
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.