Literature DB >> 27586243

Ability and efficiency of an automatic analysis software to measure microvascular parameters.

Andrea Carsetti1,2, Hollmann D Aya1, Silvia Pierantozzi1,2, Simone Bazurro1, Abele Donati2, Andrew Rhodes1,3, Maurizio Cecconi4,5.   

Abstract

Analysis of the microcirculation is currently performed offline, is time consuming and operator dependent. The aim of this study was to assess the ability and efficiency of the automatic analysis software CytoCamTools 1.7.12 (CC) to measure microvascular parameters in comparison with Automated Vascular Analysis (AVA) software 3.2. 22 patients admitted to the cardiothoracic intensive care unit following cardiac surgery were prospectively enrolled. Sublingual microcirculatory videos were analysed using AVA and CC software. The total vessel density (TVD) for small vessels, perfused vessel density (PVD) and proportion of perfused vessels (PPV) were calculated. Blood flow was assessed using the microvascular flow index (MFI) for AVA software and the averaged perfused speed indicator (APSI) for the CC software. The duration of the analysis was also recorded. Eighty-four videos from 22 patients were analysed. The bias between TVD-CC and TVD-AVA was 2.20 mm/mm2 (95 % CI 1.37-3.03) with limits of agreement (LOA) of -4.39 (95 % CI -5.66 to -3.16) and 8.79 (95 % CI 7.50-10.01) mm/mm2. The percentage error (PE) for TVD was ±32.2 %. TVD was positively correlated between CC and AVA (r = 0.74, p < 0.001). The bias between PVD-CC and PVD-AVA was 6.54 mm/mm2 (95 % CI 5.60-7.48) with LOA of -4.25 (95 % CI -8.48 to -0.02) and 17.34 (95 % CI 13.11-21.57) mm/mm2. The PE for PVD was ±61.2 %. PVD was positively correlated between CC and AVA (r = 0.66, p < 0.001). The median PPV-AVA was significantly higher than the median PPV-CC [97.39 % (95.25, 100 %) vs. 81.65 % (61.97, 88.99), p < 0.0001]. MFI categories cannot estimate or predict APSI values (p = 0.45). The time required for the analysis was shorter with CC than with AVA system [2'42″ (2'12″, 3'31″) vs. 16'12″ (13'38″, 17'57″), p < 0.001]. TVD is comparable between the two softwares, although faster with CC software. The values for PVD and PPV are not interchangeable given the different approach to assess microcirculatory flow.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Analysis; CytoCam; Incident dark field imaging; Microcirculation

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27586243     DOI: 10.1007/s10877-016-9928-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput        ISSN: 1387-1307            Impact factor:   2.502


  17 in total

1.  Using the Bland-Altman method to measure agreement with repeated measures.

Authors:  P S Myles; J Cui
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 9.166

2.  The microcirculation image quality score: development and preliminary evaluation of a proposed approach to grading quality of image acquisition for bedside videomicroscopy.

Authors:  Michael J Massey; Ethan Larochelle; Gabriel Najarro; Adarsh Karmacharla; Ryan Arnold; Stephen Trzeciak; Derek C Angus; Nathan I Shapiro
Journal:  J Crit Care       Date:  2013-08-21       Impact factor: 3.425

3.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-02-08       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Correlation, regression, and repeated data.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1994-04-02

5.  Calculating correlation coefficients with repeated observations: Part 2--Correlation between subjects.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1995-03-11

6.  Calculating correlation coefficients with repeated observations: Part 1--Correlation within subjects.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1995-02-18

7.  Measurement of functional microcirculatory geometry and velocity distributions using automated image analysis.

Authors:  J G G Dobbe; G J Streekstra; B Atasever; R van Zijderveld; C Ince
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2008-04-22       Impact factor: 2.602

8.  How to evaluate the microcirculation: report of a round table conference.

Authors:  Daniel De Backer; Steven Hollenberg; Christiaan Boerma; Peter Goedhart; Gustavo Büchele; Gustavo Ospina-Tascon; Iwan Dobbe; Can Ince
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 9.097

9.  Cytocam-IDF (incident dark field illumination) imaging for bedside monitoring of the microcirculation.

Authors:  Guclu Aykut; Gerke Veenstra; Claudia Scorcella; Can Ince; Christiaan Boerma
Journal:  Intensive Care Med Exp       Date:  2015-01-31

10.  A comparison of the quality of image acquisition between the incident dark field and sidestream dark field video-microscopes.

Authors:  Edward Gilbert-Kawai; Jonny Coppel; Vassiliki Bountziouka; Can Ince; Daniel Martin
Journal:  BMC Med Imaging       Date:  2016-01-21       Impact factor: 1.930

View more
  11 in total

1.  Could resuscitation be based on microcirculation data? We are not sure.

Authors:  Xavier Monnet; Bernd Saugel
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2018-05-07       Impact factor: 17.440

2.  Recruitment of non-perfused sublingual capillaries increases microcirculatory oxygen extraction capacity throughout ascent to 7126 m.

Authors:  Matthias Peter Hilty; Tobias Michael Merz; Urs Hefti; Can Ince; Marco Maggiorini; Jacqueline Pichler Hefti
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2019-03-28       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  Second consensus on the assessment of sublingual microcirculation in critically ill patients: results from a task force of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine.

Authors:  Can Ince; E Christiaan Boerma; Maurizio Cecconi; Daniel De Backer; Nathan I Shapiro; Jacques Duranteau; Michael R Pinsky; Antonio Artigas; Jean-Louis Teboul; Irwin K M Reiss; Cesar Aldecoa; Sam D Hutchings; Abele Donati; Marco Maggiorini; Fabio S Taccone; Glenn Hernandez; Didier Payen; Dick Tibboel; Daniel S Martin; Alexander Zarbock; Xavier Monnet; Arnaldo Dubin; Jan Bakker; Jean-Louis Vincent; Thomas W L Scheeren
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2018-02-06       Impact factor: 17.440

4.  Digging into the microcirculation: the rush for gold may excavate apples and oranges.

Authors:  E Christiaan Boerma; Thomas W L Scheeren
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2016-10-11       Impact factor: 2.502

5.  MicroTools enables automated quantification of capillary density and red blood cell velocity in handheld vital microscopy.

Authors:  Matthias Peter Hilty; Philippe Guerci; Yasin Ince; Fevzi Toraman; Can Ince
Journal:  Commun Biol       Date:  2019-06-19

6.  Identification of novel sublingual parameters to analyze and diagnose microvascular dysfunction in sepsis: the NOSTRADAMUS study.

Authors:  Hans Vink; Philipp Kümpers; Alexandros Rovas; Jan Sackarnd; Jan Rossaint; Stefanie Kampmeier; Hermann Pavenstädt
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2021-03-19       Impact factor: 9.097

7.  Evaluation of automated microvascular flow analysis software AVA 4: a validation study.

Authors:  Christian S Guay; Mariam Khebir; T Shiva Shahiri; Ariana Szilagyi; Erin Elizabeth Cole; Gabrielle Simoneau; Mohamed Badawy
Journal:  Intensive Care Med Exp       Date:  2021-04-02

8.  Efficacy of CytoSorb in a Pediatric Case of Severe Multisystem Infammatory Syndrome (MIS-C): A Clinical Case Report.

Authors:  Gabriella Bottari; Valerio Confalone; Nicola Cotugno; Isabella Guzzo; Salvatore Perdichizzi; Emma C Manno; Francesca Stoppa; Corrado Cecchetti
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2021-06-11       Impact factor: 3.418

Review 9.  Recent advances in bedside microcirculation assessment in critically ill patients.

Authors:  Philipe Franco do Amaral Tafner; Felipe Ko Chen; Roberto Rabello; Thiago Domingos Corrêa; Renato Carneiro de Freitas Chaves; Ary Serpa
Journal:  Rev Bras Ter Intensiva       Date:  2017 Apr-Jun

10.  Sublingual microcirculation does not reflect red blood cell transfusion thresholds in the intensive care unit-a prospective observational study in the intensive care unit.

Authors:  Jonas Scheuzger; Anna Zehnder; Vera Meier; Desirée Yeginsoy; Julian Flükiger; Martin Siegemund
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2020-01-17       Impact factor: 9.097

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.