Hans Vink1, Philipp Kümpers2, Alexandros Rovas3, Jan Sackarnd4, Jan Rossaint5, Stefanie Kampmeier6, Hermann Pavenstädt3. 1. Department of Physiology, Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands. 2. Department of Medicine D, Division of General Internal and Emergency Medicine, Nephrology, and Rheumatology, University Hospital Münster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, 48149, Münster, Germany. philipp.kuempers@ukmuenster.de. 3. Department of Medicine D, Division of General Internal and Emergency Medicine, Nephrology, and Rheumatology, University Hospital Münster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, 48149, Münster, Germany. 4. Department of Cardiology and Angiology, University Hospital Münster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, 48149, Münster, Germany. 5. Department of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care and Pain Medicine, University Hospital Münster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, 48149, Münster, Germany. 6. Institute of Hygiene, University Hospital Münster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, 48149, Münster, Germany.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The availability of handheld, noninvasive sublingual video-microscopes allows for visualization of the microcirculation in critically ill patients. Recent studies demonstrate that reduced numbers of blood-perfused microvessels and increased penetration of erythrocytes into the endothelial glycocalyx are essential components of microvascular dysfunction. The aim of this study was to identify novel microvascular variables to determine the level of microvascular dysfunction in sepsis and its relationship with clinical variables. METHODS: This observational, prospective, cross-sectional study included 51 participants, of which 34 critically ill sepsis patients were recruited from intensive care units of a university hospital. Seventeen healthy volunteers served as controls. All participants underwent sublingual videomicroscopy by sidestream darkfield imaging. A new developed version of the Glycocheck™ software was used to quantify vascular density, perfused boundary region (PBR-an inverse variable of endothelial glycocalyx dimensions), red blood cell (RBC) velocity, RBC content, and blood flow in sublingual microvessels with diameters between 4 and 25 µm. RESULTS: A detailed analysis of adjacent diameter classes (1 µm each) of vessels between 4 and 25 µm revealed a severe reduction of vascular density in very small capillaries (5-7 µm), which correlated with markers of sepsis severity. Analysis of RBC velocity (VRBC) revealed a strong dependency between capillary and feed vessel VRBC in sepsis patients (R2 = 0.63, p < 0.0001) but not in healthy controls (R2 = 0.04, p = 0.43), indicating impaired capillary (de-)recruitment in sepsis. This finding enabled the calculation of capillary recruitment and dynamic capillary blood volume (CBVdynamic). Moreover, adjustment of PBR to feed vessel VRBC further improved discrimination between sepsis patients and controls by about 50%. By combining these dynamic microvascular and glycocalyx variables, we developed the microvascular health score (MVHSdynamic™), which decreased from 7.4 [4.6-8.7] in controls to 1.8 [1.4-2.7] in sepsis patients (p < 0.0001) and correlated with sepsis severity. CONCLUSION: We introduce new important diameter-specific quantification and differentiated analysis of RBC kinetics, a key to understand microvascular dysfunction in sepsis. MVHSdynamic, which has a broad bandwidth to detect microvascular (dys-) function, might serve as a valuable tool to detect microvascular impairment in critically ill patients.
BACKGROUND: The availability of handheld, noninvasive sublingual video-microscopes allows for visualization of the microcirculation in critically illpatients. Recent studies demonstrate that reduced numbers of blood-perfused microvessels and increased penetration of erythrocytes into the endothelial glycocalyx are essential components of microvascular dysfunction. The aim of this study was to identify novel microvascular variables to determine the level of microvascular dysfunction in sepsis and its relationship with clinical variables. METHODS: This observational, prospective, cross-sectional study included 51 participants, of which 34 critically ill sepsispatients were recruited from intensive care units of a university hospital. Seventeen healthy volunteers served as controls. All participants underwent sublingual videomicroscopy by sidestream darkfield imaging. A new developed version of the Glycocheck™ software was used to quantify vascular density, perfused boundary region (PBR-an inverse variable of endothelial glycocalyx dimensions), red blood cell (RBC) velocity, RBC content, and blood flow in sublingual microvessels with diameters between 4 and 25 µm. RESULTS: A detailed analysis of adjacent diameter classes (1 µm each) of vessels between 4 and 25 µm revealed a severe reduction of vascular density in very small capillaries (5-7 µm), which correlated with markers of sepsis severity. Analysis of RBC velocity (VRBC) revealed a strong dependency between capillary and feed vessel VRBC in sepsispatients (R2 = 0.63, p < 0.0001) but not in healthy controls (R2 = 0.04, p = 0.43), indicating impaired capillary (de-)recruitment in sepsis. This finding enabled the calculation of capillary recruitment and dynamic capillary blood volume (CBVdynamic). Moreover, adjustment of PBR to feed vessel VRBC further improved discrimination between sepsispatients and controls by about 50%. By combining these dynamic microvascular and glycocalyx variables, we developed the microvascular health score (MVHSdynamic™), which decreased from 7.4 [4.6-8.7] in controls to 1.8 [1.4-2.7] in sepsispatients (p < 0.0001) and correlated with sepsis severity. CONCLUSION: We introduce new important diameter-specific quantification and differentiated analysis of RBC kinetics, a key to understand microvascular dysfunction in sepsis. MVHSdynamic, which has a broad bandwidth to detect microvascular (dys-) function, might serve as a valuable tool to detect microvascular impairment in critically illpatients.
Authors: Sam D Hutchings; David N Naumann; Philip Hopkins; Clare Mellis; Paul Riozzi; Stefano Sartini; Jasna Mamuza; Tim Harris; Mark J Midwinter; Julia Wendon Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2018-09 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: Can Ince; E Christiaan Boerma; Maurizio Cecconi; Daniel De Backer; Nathan I Shapiro; Jacques Duranteau; Michael R Pinsky; Antonio Artigas; Jean-Louis Teboul; Irwin K M Reiss; Cesar Aldecoa; Sam D Hutchings; Abele Donati; Marco Maggiorini; Fabio S Taccone; Glenn Hernandez; Didier Payen; Dick Tibboel; Daniel S Martin; Alexander Zarbock; Xavier Monnet; Arnaldo Dubin; Jan Bakker; Jean-Louis Vincent; Thomas W L Scheeren Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2018-02-06 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Andrius Pranskunas; Matty Koopmans; Peter M Koetsier; Vidas Pilvinis; E Christiaan Boerma Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2012-12-20 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Michael J Massey; Peter C Hou; Michael Filbin; Henry Wang; Long Ngo; David T Huang; William C Aird; Victor Novack; Stephen Trzeciak; Donald M Yealy; John A Kellum; Derek C Angus; Nathan I Shapiro Journal: Crit Care Date: 2018-11-20 Impact factor: 9.097
Authors: Alexandros Rovas; Konrad Buscher; Irina Osiaevi; Carolin Christina Drost; Jan Sackarnd; Phil-Robin Tepasse; Manfred Fobker; Joachim Kühn; Stephan Braune; Ulrich Göbel; Gerold Thölking; Andreas Gröschel; Jan Rossaint; Hans Vink; Alexander Lukasz; Hermann Pavenstädt; Philipp Kümpers Journal: Angiogenesis Date: 2022-06-20 Impact factor: 10.658
Authors: Lushun Yuan; Shuzhen Cheng; Wendy M P J Sol; Anouk I M van der Velden; Hans Vink; Ton J Rabelink; Bernard M van den Berg Journal: ERJ Open Res Date: 2022-05-03
Authors: Carolin Christina Drost; Alexandros Rovas; Irina Osiaevi; Matthias Rauen; Johan van der Vlag; Baranca Buijsers; Rustem Salmenov; Alexander Lukasz; Hermann Pavenstädt; Wolfgang A Linke; Philipp Kümpers Journal: Front Immunol Date: 2022-06-10 Impact factor: 8.786