Literature DB >> 27578907

Validity of a tablet computer version of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association hip disease evaluation questionnaire: a pilot study.

Yasuhiko Takegami1, Taisuke Seki1, Ayumi Kaneuji2, Akinobu Nakao3, Yukiharu Hasegawa4, Naoki Ishiguro1.   

Abstract

The Japanese Orthopaedic Association hip disease evaluation questionnaire (JHEQ) was established as a new patient-reported outcome for patients with hip disease. We developed a JHEQ application beta version for tablet computers. The application has a slider system to input visual analogue scale (VAS) measurements. The purposes of this study were 1) to test whether the VAS that was acquired from this slider system was equal to the value recorded on paper and 2) to evaluate the validity and agreement of the JHEQ tablet version. A total of 57 patients were analyzed in the study (mean age, 60.2 years; range, 29-81 years). They received either the paper-and-pencil version (paper version) or the tablet computer version (tablet version). To evaluate the validity of the tablet version, we analyzed differences in the VAS and total scores between the paper version and tablet computer version. In addition, we calculated Cronbach's alpha, the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), and the Pearson's correlation coefficient (CC). The VAS scores in the tablet version were significantly lower than those in the paper version (22.3 ± 5.4 vs. 17.0 ± 4.5 and 28.1 ± 6.1 vs. 23.5 ± 5.3, respectively; all P < 0.05). Values of Cronbach's alpha, the ICC, and the CC among subscales ranged from 0.90 to 0.95. In conclusion, the total JHEQ score on the tablet computer beta version was in agreement with the score on the paper version. However, the VAS on the tablet version, which used a slider bar system, proved unreliable.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Japanese Orthopaedic Association hip disease evaluation questionnaire (JHEQ); osteoarthritis of hip; patient-reported outcome; tablet computer

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27578907      PMCID: PMC4995269     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nagoya J Med Sci        ISSN: 0027-7622            Impact factor:   1.131


  15 in total

1.  The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection.

Authors:  J E Ware; C D Sherbourne
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 2.983

2.  Use of the standard error as a reliability index of interest: an applied example using elbow flexor strength data.

Authors:  P W Stratford; C H Goldsmith
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  1997-07

3.  The Equivalence of Remote Electronic and Paper Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Collection.

Authors:  W Griffiths-Jones; M R Norton; E D Fern; D H Williams
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2014-07-04       Impact factor: 4.757

4.  Patients respond similarly to paper and electronic versions of the WOMAC and SF-12 following total joint arthroplasty.

Authors:  Jacquelyn D Marsh; Dianne M Bryant; Steven J Macdonald; Douglas D R Naudie
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2013-08-15       Impact factor: 4.757

5.  Comparison of paper and computer-based questionnaire modes for measuring health outcomes in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Nina Shervin; Janet Dorrwachter; Charles R Bragdon; David Shervin; David Zurakowski; Henrik Malchau
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2011-02-02       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  Reliability and validity of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association hip disease evaluation questionnaire (JHEQ) for patients with hip disease.

Authors:  Taisuke Seki; Yukiharu Hasegawa; Kazuma Ikeuchi; Naoki Ishiguro; Yoshimitsu Hiejima
Journal:  J Orthop Sci       Date:  2013-07-13       Impact factor: 1.601

7.  Validation study of a computerized version of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities VA3.0 Osteoarthritis Index.

Authors:  N Bellamy; J Campbell; J Stevens; L Pilch; C Stewart; Z Mahmood
Journal:  J Rheumatol       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 4.666

Review 8.  Recommendations for incorporating patient-reported outcomes into clinical comparative effectiveness research in adult oncology.

Authors:  Ethan Basch; Amy P Abernethy; C Daniel Mullins; Bryce B Reeve; Mary Lou Smith; Stephen Joel Coons; Jeff Sloan; Keith Wenzel; Cynthia Chauhan; Wayland Eppard; Elizabeth S Frank; Joseph Lipscomb; Stephen A Raymond; Merianne Spencer; Sean Tunis
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-10-15       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Assessing activity in joint replacement patients.

Authors:  C A Zahiri; T P Schmalzried; E S Szuszczewicz; H C Amstutz
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 4.757

10.  Japanese Orthopaedic Association Hip Disease Evaluation Questionnaire (JHEQ): a patient-based evaluation tool for hip-joint disease. The Subcommittee on Hip Disease Evaluation of the Clinical Outcome Committee of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association.

Authors:  Tadami Matsumoto; Ayumi Kaneuji; Yoshimitsu Hiejima; Hajime Sugiyama; Haruhiko Akiyama; Takashi Atsumi; Masaji Ishii; Kiyoko Izumi; Toru Ichiseki; Hiroshi Ito; Takahiro Okawa; Kenji Ohzono; Hiromi Otsuka; Shunji Kishida; Seneki Kobayashi; Takeshi Sawaguchi; Nobuhiko Sugano; Ikumasa Nakajima; Shigeru Nakamura; Yukiharu Hasegawa; Kanji Fukuda; Genji Fujii; Taro Mawatari; Satoshi Mori; Yuji Yasunaga; Masao Yamaguchi
Journal:  J Orthop Sci       Date:  2011-11-02       Impact factor: 1.601

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.