Literature DB >> 25123605

The Equivalence of Remote Electronic and Paper Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Collection.

W Griffiths-Jones1, M R Norton1, E D Fern1, D H Williams1.   

Abstract

Individual patient level Patient Reported Outcomes (PROs) are increasingly important in clinical practice. Web-based collection enables clinicians to remotely collect scores at regular intervals, away from the clinic setting. In this randomized crossover study, 47 patients, having undergone hip surgery, were allocated to two groups. Group 1 completed the web-based scores followed by the paper equivalents one week later; Group 2 completed the scores the other way around. The Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) for the Oxford Hip Score was 0.99, 0.98 to 0.99 (ICC, 95% CI) and the ICCs for the other scores were between 0.95 and 0.97. We conclude that remote ePRO collection using this web-based system reveals excellent equivalence to paper PRO collection of the Oxford Hip, McCarthy, UCLA and howRu scores.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  electronic health; hip impingement; hip surgery; outcomes; patient reported outcome measures

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25123605     DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2014.07.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  6 in total

1.  Pathophysiology and risk factors for osteonecrosis.

Authors:  Kalpit N Shah; Jennifer Racine; Lynne C Jones; Roy K Aaron
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2015-09

Review 2.  Multiple sclerosis: clinical profiling and data collection as prerequisite for personalized medicine approach.

Authors:  Tjalf Ziemssen; Raimar Kern; Katja Thomas
Journal:  BMC Neurol       Date:  2016-08-02       Impact factor: 2.474

3.  Subjects with osteoarthritis can easily use a handheld touch screen electronic device to report medication use: qualitative results from a usability study.

Authors:  Laura Khurana; Ellen M Durand; Sarah T Gary; Antonio V Otero; Millie C Gerzon; Jamie Beck; Chris Hall; Susan M Dallabrida
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2016-10-28       Impact factor: 2.711

4.  Is virtual clinic follow-up of hip and knee joint replacement acceptable to patients and clinicians? A sequential mixed methods evaluation.

Authors:  Rebekah J Parkes; Joanne Palmer; Jennifer Wingham; Dan H Williams
Journal:  BMJ Open Qual       Date:  2019-03-01

5.  Evaluation of the Paper and Smartphone Versions of the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology-Self-Report (QIDS-SR16) and the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) in Depressed Patients in China.

Authors:  Long Zhen; Gang Wang; Gailing Xu; Le Xiao; Lei Feng; Xu Chen; Man Liu; Xuequan Zhu
Journal:  Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat       Date:  2020-04-17       Impact factor: 2.570

6.  Validity of a tablet computer version of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association hip disease evaluation questionnaire: a pilot study.

Authors:  Yasuhiko Takegami; Taisuke Seki; Ayumi Kaneuji; Akinobu Nakao; Yukiharu Hasegawa; Naoki Ishiguro
Journal:  Nagoya J Med Sci       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 1.131

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.