Literature DB >> 24193495

Methanogenesis in monogastric animals.

B B Jensen1.   

Abstract

Studies of methanogenic bacteria present in monogastric animals are still scarce. Methanogens have been isolated from faeces of rat, horse, pig, monkey, baboon, rhinoceros, hippopotamus, giant panda, goose, turkey and chicken. The predominant methanogen in all except the chicken and turkey is species of Methanobrevibacterium. The chicken and turkey harbour species of Methanogenium. In pig the population of methanogenic bacteria is more than 30 times as dense in the distal colon as in the caecum. This finding is in agreement with the finding that the rate of methane production is much higher in the colon than in the ceacum. The amount of methane excreted clearly seems to depend on the amount of non-starch polysaccharide intake.The directly measured methane production rate in pigs is from 3.3 to 3.8 times lower than the amount expected from stoichiometric estimates. These data, together with data showing that only small net amounts of hydrogen and small amounts of methane are produced in the ceacum and proximal colon where the microbial activity is high, clearly indicate that hydrogen sinks other than methane production are involved in hydrogen removal in the hindgut of pigs and probably also in other monogastric animals.Methane production by monogastric animals is lower than methane production by ruminants. However, methane production by large herbivorous monogastric animals such as horses, mules and asses is substantial (up to 80 l per animal per day). Methane production by rodents and avians is low. In general, methane production by wild animals is lower than methane production by domestic animals. It is concluded that the contribution of monogastric animals to the global methane emission is negligible, as it only represent about 5% of the total methane emission by domestic and wild animals of 80 Tg per year.

Entities:  

Year:  1996        PMID: 24193495     DOI: 10.1007/BF00394044

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Monit Assess        ISSN: 0167-6369            Impact factor:   2.513


  13 in total

1.  Effect of high-fiber and high-oil diets on the fecal flora of swine.

Authors:  W E Moore; L V Moore; E P Cato; T D Wilkins; E T Kornegay
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Gastrointestinal implications in pigs of wheat and oat fractions. 2. Microbial activity in the gastrointestinal tract.

Authors:  K E Bach Knudsen; B B Jensen; J O Andersen; I Hansen
Journal:  Br J Nutr       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 3.718

3.  Oat bran but not a beta-glucan-enriched oat fraction enhances butyrate production in the large intestine of pigs.

Authors:  K E Knudsen; B B Jensen; I Hansen
Journal:  J Nutr       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 4.798

4.  In vitro total-gas, CH4, H2, volatile fatty acid, and lactate kinetics studies on luminal contents from the small intestine, cecum, and colon of the pig.

Authors:  J A Robinson; W J Smolenski; M L Ogilvie; J P Peters
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1989-10       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Effect of dietary fiber on microbial activity and microbial gas production in various regions of the gastrointestinal tract of pigs.

Authors:  B B Jensen; H Jørgensen
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 4.792

6.  Assessment of fermentation in growing pigs given unmolassed sugar-beet pulp: a stoichiometric approach.

Authors:  J Q Zhu; V R Fowler; M F Fuller
Journal:  Br J Nutr       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 3.718

7.  Methane excretion in the growing pig.

Authors:  K Christensen; G Thorbek
Journal:  Br J Nutr       Date:  1987-05       Impact factor: 3.718

8.  Enumeration of selected anaerobic bacterial groups in cecal and colonic contents of growing-finishing pigs.

Authors:  T J Butine; J A Leedle
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 4.792

9.  Digestion of polysaccharides and other major components in the small and large intestine of pigs fed on diets consisting of oat fractions rich in beta-D-glucan.

Authors:  K E Knudsen; B B Jensen; I Hansen
Journal:  Br J Nutr       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 3.718

10.  Alternative pathways for hydrogen disposal during fermentation in the human colon.

Authors:  G R Gibson; J H Cummings; G T Macfarlane; C Allison; I Segal; H H Vorster; A R Walker
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 23.059

View more
  10 in total

1.  Ecological characterisation of the colonic microbiota in arctic and sub-arctic seals.

Authors:  Trine Glad; Vibeke Fam Kristiansen; Kaare M Nielsen; Lorenzo Brusetti; André-Denis G Wright; Monica A Sundset
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2010-06-04       Impact factor: 4.552

2.  Stable carbon and nitrogen isotope enrichment in primate tissues.

Authors:  Brooke E Crowley; Melinda L Carter; Sarah M Karpanty; Adrienne L Zihlman; Paul L Koch; Nathaniel J Dominy
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2010-07-14       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Development of a swine-specific fecal pollution marker based on host differences in methanogen mcrA genes.

Authors:  Jennifer A Ufnar; David F Ufnar; Shiao Y Wang; R D Ellender
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2007-06-22       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Comparative fecal metagenomics unveils unique functional capacity of the swine gut.

Authors:  Regina Lamendella; Jorge W Santo Domingo; Shreya Ghosh; John Martinson; Daniel B Oerther
Journal:  BMC Microbiol       Date:  2011-05-15       Impact factor: 3.605

5.  Microbial community structure across a wastewater-impacted riparian buffer zone in the southeastern coastal plain.

Authors:  T F Ducey; P R Johnson; A D Shriner; T A Matheny; P G Hunt
Journal:  Open Microbiol J       Date:  2013-06-28

6.  Comparative analysis of the methanogen diversity in horse and pony by using mcrA gene and archaeal 16s rRNA gene clone libraries.

Authors:  Khin-Ohnmar Lwin; Hiroki Matsui
Journal:  Archaea       Date:  2014-01-30       Impact factor: 3.273

Review 7.  The gut microbiome of horses: current research on equine enteral microbiota and future perspectives.

Authors:  Anne Kauter; Lennard Epping; Torsten Semmler; Esther-Maria Antao; Dania Kannapin; Sabita D Stoeckle; Heidrun Gehlen; Antina Lübke-Becker; Sebastian Günther; Lothar H Wieler; Birgit Walther
Journal:  Anim Microbiome       Date:  2019-11-13

8.  Establishment and assessment of an amplicon sequencing method targeting the 16S-ITS-23S rRNA operon for analysis of the equine gut microbiome.

Authors:  Yuta Kinoshita; Hidekazu Niwa; Eri Uchida-Fujii; Toshio Nukada
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-06-04       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Effect of dietary supplementation of xylanase on apparent ileal digestibility of nutrients, viscosity of digesta, and intestinal morphology of growing pigs fed corn and soybean meal based diet.

Authors:  Adsos Adami Passos; Inkyung Park; Peter Ferket; Elke von Heimendahl; Sung Woo Kim
Journal:  Anim Nutr       Date:  2015-03-11

Review 10.  Verrucomicrobial methanotrophs: ecophysiology of metabolically versatile acidophiles.

Authors:  Rob A Schmitz; Stijn H Peeters; Wouter Versantvoort; Nunzia Picone; Arjan Pol; Mike S M Jetten; Huub J M Op den Camp
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Rev       Date:  2021-09-08       Impact factor: 16.408

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.