Literature DB >> 21929377

Tailoring auditory training to patient needs with single and multiple talkers: transfer-appropriate gains on a four-choice discrimination test.

Joe Barcroft1, Mitchell S Sommers, Nancy Tye-Murray, Elizabeth Mauzé, Catherine Schroy, Brent Spehar.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Our long-term objective is to develop an auditory training program that will enhance speech recognition in those situations where patients most want improvement. As a first step, the current investigation trained participants using either a single talker or multiple talkers to determine if auditory training leads to transfer-appropriate gains.
DESIGN: The experiment implemented a 2 × 2 × 2 mixed design, with training condition as a between-participants variable and testing interval and test version as repeated-measures variables. Participants completed a computerized six-week auditory training program wherein they heard either the speech of a single talker or the speech of six talkers. Training gains were assessed with single-talker and multi-talker versions of the Four-choice discrimination test. Participants in both groups were tested on both versions. STUDY SAMPLE: Sixty-nine adult hearing-aid users were randomly assigned to either single-talker or multi-talker auditory training.
RESULTS: Both groups showed significant gains on both test versions. Participants who trained with multiple talkers showed greater improvement on the multi-talker version whereas participants who trained with a single talker showed greater improvement on the single-talker version.
CONCLUSION: Transfer-appropriate gains occurred following auditory training, suggesting that auditory training can be designed to target specific patient needs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21929377      PMCID: PMC3328192          DOI: 10.3109/14992027.2011.599868

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Audiol        ISSN: 1499-2027            Impact factor:   2.117


  22 in total

1.  Transfer of a speed of processing intervention to near and far cognitive functions.

Authors:  Jerri D Edwards; Virginia G Wadley; R enee S Myers; Daniel L Roenker; Gayla M Cissell; Karlene K Ball
Journal:  Gerontology       Date:  2002 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.140

2.  Learning to recognize talkers from natural, sinewave, and reversed speech samples.

Authors:  Sonya M Sheffert; David B Pisoni; Jennifer M Fellowes; Robert E Remez
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  Training Japanese listeners to identify English /r/ and /l/: a first report.

Authors:  J S Logan; S E Lively; D B Pisoni
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 4.  Efficacy of individual auditory training in adults: a systematic review of the evidence.

Authors:  Robert Sweetow; Catherine V Palmer
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2005 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.664

5.  Effect of training on word-recognition performance in noise for young normal-hearing and older hearing-impaired listeners.

Authors:  Matthew H Burk; Larry E Humes; Nathan E Amos; Lauren E Strauser
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 3.570

6.  On the perception of similarity among talkers.

Authors:  Robert E Remez; Jennifer M Fellowes; Dalia S Nagel
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  A latent change score analysis of a randomized clinical trial in reasoning training.

Authors:  John J McArdle; John J Prindle
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2008-12

8.  Effects of long-term training on aided speech-recognition performance in noise in older adults.

Authors:  Matthew H Burk; Larry E Humes
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 2.297

9.  Auditory training and challenges associated with participation and compliance.

Authors:  Robert W Sweetow; Jennifer Henderson Sabes
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 1.664

10.  Auditory-visual discourse comprehension by older and young adults in favorable and unfavorable conditions.

Authors:  Nancy Tye-Murray; Mitchell Sommers; Brent Spehar; Joel Myerson; Sandra Hale; Nathan S Rose
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 2.117

View more
  8 in total

1.  Frequent false hearing by older adults: the role of age differences in metacognition.

Authors:  Chad S Rogers; Larry L Jacoby; Mitchell S Sommers
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2011-12-12

2.  New Directions for Auditory Training: Introduction.

Authors:  Mitchell Sommers
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2016-08-01       Impact factor: 2.297

3.  Task- and Talker-Specific Gains in Auditory Training.

Authors:  Joe Barcroft; Brent Spehar; Nancy Tye-Murray; Mitchell Sommers
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2016-08-01       Impact factor: 2.297

4.  Auditory Training for Adults Who Have Hearing Loss: A Comparison of Spaced Versus Massed Practice Schedules.

Authors:  Nancy Tye-Murray; Brent Spehar; Joe Barcroft; Mitchell Sommers
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2017-08-16       Impact factor: 2.297

5.  Partial maintenance of auditory-based cognitive training benefits in older adults.

Authors:  Samira Anderson; Travis White-Schwoch; Hee Jae Choi; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2014-08-08       Impact factor: 3.139

6.  Auditory Training With Frequent Communication Partners.

Authors:  Nancy Tye-Murray; Brent Spehar; Mitchell Sommers; Joe Barcroft
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2016-08-01       Impact factor: 2.297

Review 7.  Efficacy of individual computer-based auditory training for people with hearing loss: a systematic review of the evidence.

Authors:  Helen Henshaw; Melanie A Ferguson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-05-10       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Teaching Children With Hearing Loss to Recognize Speech: Gains Made With Computer-Based Auditory and/or Speechreading Training.

Authors:  Nancy Tye-Murray; Brent Spehar; Mitchell Sommers; Elizabeth Mauzé; Joe Barcroft; Heather Grantham
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2022 Jan/Feb       Impact factor: 3.562

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.