Literature DB >> 27565254

Screening of gestational carriers in the United States.

Erika L Fuchs1, Abbey B Berenson2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess medical and psychosocial screening and evaluation received by gestational carriers and compare those using agencies to those not using agencies.
DESIGN: Cross-sectional questionnaire.
SETTING: Not applicable. PATIENT(S): A total of 204 women who completed a survey on their experiences as gestational carriers in the United States. INTERVENTION(S): None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Self-reported screening received before gestational carrier pregnancies. RESULT(S): Overall, 97.1% of gestational carriers had a complete medical evaluation and 94.6% had an evaluation or counseling by a mental health professional. Most participants indicated that they had been informed of at least some medical risks (92.6%) and psychological considerations (89.7%). Participants most often recalled being informed of the risks of multiple pregnancy (89.2%) and medical procedures and medications (87.2%), but least often recalled being informed about the risks of impact on their own employment (46.6%) and to their own children (61.3%). There were no differences in outcome measures between those using an agency and those who did not. CONCLUSION(S): Self-reported screening and evaluation was high, but still not 100% on all measures. Further education of providers regarding guidelines for the screening and evaluation of gestational carriers may be needed.
Copyright © 2016 American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Gestational carrier; infertility; screening; surrogate

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27565254      PMCID: PMC5159232          DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.07.1111

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  15 in total

1.  Recommendations for practices utilizing gestational carriers: an ASRM Practice Committee guideline.

Authors: 
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2012-04-12       Impact factor: 7.329

2.  Assessment of United States fertility clinic websites according to the American Society for Reproductive Medicine (ASRM)/Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology (SART) guidelines.

Authors:  Mary E Abusief; Mark D Hornstein; Tarun Jain
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2006-11-01       Impact factor: 7.329

3.  Evaluation of compliance and range of fees among American Society for Reproductive Medicine-listed egg donor and surrogacy agencies.

Authors:  Janelle Luk; John C Petrozza
Journal:  J Reprod Med       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 0.142

4.  Recommendations for practices utilizing gestational carriers: a committee opinion.

Authors: 
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2014-12-04       Impact factor: 7.329

5.  A comparison of oocyte donors' and gestational carriers/surrogates' attitudes towards third party reproduction.

Authors:  Andrea Mechanick Bravennan; Stephen L Corson
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 3.412

6.  Consideration of the gestational carrier: a committee opinion.

Authors: 
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2013-03-29       Impact factor: 7.329

7.  Trends and outcomes of gestational surrogacy in the United States.

Authors:  Kiran M Perkins; Sheree L Boulet; Denise J Jamieson; Dmitry M Kissin
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2016-04-14       Impact factor: 7.329

8.  Results of the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 among gestational surrogacy candidates.

Authors:  Susan C Klock; Sharon N Covington
Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet       Date:  2015-05-09       Impact factor: 3.561

9.  Recruiting egg donors online: an analysis of in vitro fertilization clinic and agency websites' adherence to American Society for Reproductive Medicine guidelines.

Authors:  Jason Keehn; Eve Holwell; Ruqayyah Abdul-Karim; Lisa Judy Chin; Cheng-Shiun Leu; Mark V Sauer; Robert Klitzman
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2012-07-27       Impact factor: 7.329

10.  Compliance with donor age recommendations in oocyte donor recruitment advertisements in the USA.

Authors:  Hillary B Alberta; Roberta M Berry; Aaron D Levine
Journal:  Reprod Biomed Online       Date:  2012-12-01       Impact factor: 3.828

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  "One for Sorrow, Two for Joy?": American embryo transfer guideline recommendations, practices, and outcomes for gestational surrogate patients.

Authors:  Pamela M White
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2017-02-09       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Outcomes for Gestational Carriers Versus Traditional Surrogates in the United States.

Authors:  Erika L Fuchs; Abbey B Berenson
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2018-01-11       Impact factor: 2.681

3.  Reduction in multiple pregnancy rate in donor oocyte-recipient gestational carrier (GC) in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles in the USA with single-embryo transfer and preimplantation genetic testing.

Authors:  Reeva Makhijani; Madeline Coulter; Arti Taggar; Prachi Godiwala; David O'Sullivan; John Nulsen; Lawrence Engmann; Claudio Benadiva; Daniel Grow
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2021-03-11       Impact factor: 3.357

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.