Literature DB >> 33709344

Reduction in multiple pregnancy rate in donor oocyte-recipient gestational carrier (GC) in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles in the USA with single-embryo transfer and preimplantation genetic testing.

Reeva Makhijani1, Madeline Coulter1, Arti Taggar1, Prachi Godiwala1, David O'Sullivan1, John Nulsen1, Lawrence Engmann1, Claudio Benadiva1, Daniel Grow2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the utilization of single-embryo transfer (SET) and preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) in gestational carrier IVF cycles in the USA with donor oocyte and examine the impact on live birth and multiple gestation.
METHODS: Retrospective cohort study using the Society of Assisted Reproductive Technology (SART) clinic database of 4776 donor oocyte-recipient IVF cycles in which a GC was used. The cycles were separated into 4 groups by use of PGT and number of embryos transferred as follows: (1) PGT and single-embryo transfer (PGT-SET); (2) PGT and multiple embryo transfer (PGT-MET); (3) no PGT and SET (NoPGT-SET); (4) no PGT and MET (NoPGT-MET). Primary outcomes were live birth rate (LBR) and multiple pregnancy rate (MPR).
RESULTS: More than one blastocyst was transferred in 48.7% (2323/4774) of the cycles. When ≥1 blastocyst was transferred, with or without the use of PGT, the MPR was 45.5% and 42.0%, respectively. In comparison, in the PGT-SET and NoPGT-SET groups, the MPR was 1.4% (8/579) and 3.3% (29/883), respectively. Live birth rates increased with the use of PGT-A and with MET.
CONCLUSION: This study shows that SET, with or without PGT, is associated with a significantly reduced MPR in donor oocyte-recipient GC IVF cycles while maintaining high LBR. It also demonstrates that many infertility centers in the USA are not adhering to ASRM embryo transfer guidelines. Our findings highlight an opportunity to increase GC safety, which ultimately may lead to widened access to this increasingly restricted service outside the USA.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Gestational carrier; In vitro fertilization; Oocyte donation; Preimplantation genetic testing; Single-embryo transfer

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33709344      PMCID: PMC8266963          DOI: 10.1007/s10815-021-02112-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet        ISSN: 1058-0468            Impact factor:   3.357


  33 in total

1.  6. Ethical issues related to multiple pregnancies in medically assisted procreation.

Authors: 
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 6.918

2.  ACOG Practice Bulletin #56: Multiple gestation: complicated twin, triplet, and high-order multifetal pregnancy.

Authors: 
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 7.661

3.  Neonatal and maternal outcome after frozen embryo transfer: Increased risks in programmed cycles.

Authors:  Erica Ginström Ernstad; Ulla-Britt Wennerholm; Ali Khatibi; Max Petzold; Christina Bergh
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2019-03-22       Impact factor: 8.661

4.  Guidance on the limits to the number of embryos to transfer: a committee opinion.

Authors: 
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2017-03-11       Impact factor: 7.329

5.  Criteria for number of embryos to transfer: a committee opinion.

Authors: 
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2012-10-22       Impact factor: 7.329

6.  Cross-border reproductive care: an Ethics Committee opinion.

Authors: 
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2016-09-24       Impact factor: 7.329

7.  In vitro fertilization with single euploid blastocyst transfer: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Eric J Forman; Kathleen H Hong; Kathleen M Ferry; Xin Tao; Deanne Taylor; Brynn Levy; Nathan R Treff; Richard T Scott
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2013-03-30       Impact factor: 7.329

8.  Obstetrical complications in gestational carrier pregnancies.

Authors:  Deirdre A Duffy; John C Nulsen; Donald B Maier; Lawrence Engmann; David Schmidt; Claudio A Benadiva
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 7.329

9.  Donor oocyte recipients do not benefit from preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy to improve pregnancy outcomes.

Authors:  Nicole Doyle; Michelle Gainty; Allison Eubanks; Joseph Doyle; Heidi Hayes; Michael Tucker; Kate Devine; Alan DeCherney; Michael Levy; Samad Jahandideh; Micah Hill
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2020-11-01       Impact factor: 6.918

10.  Next generation sequencing for preimplantation genetic screening improves pregnancy outcomes compared with array comparative genomic hybridization in single thawed euploid embryo transfer cycles.

Authors:  Jenna Friedenthal; Susan M Maxwell; Santiago Munné; Yael Kramer; David H McCulloh; Caroline McCaffrey; James A Grifo
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2018-03-28       Impact factor: 7.329

View more
  1 in total

1.  Genetic counseling decisions in gestational carrier pregnancies.

Authors:  Melody A Rasouli; Hailey E Roberts; David N Jackson
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2022-04-04       Impact factor: 3.357

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.