Literature DB >> 28185120

"One for Sorrow, Two for Joy?": American embryo transfer guideline recommendations, practices, and outcomes for gestational surrogate patients.

Pamela M White1.   

Abstract

In January 2016, Melissa Cook, a California gestational surrogate experiencing a multiple-birth pregnancy following the in vitro fertilization (IVF) transfer of three embryos comprised of donor eggs and sperm provided by the intended father, went to the media when the intended father requested that she undergo a fetal reduction because twins were less expensive to raise than triplets. Much of the legal interest in this case to date has centered on the enforceability of surrogacy contracts. However, the Cook case also raises troubling issues about fertility treatment practices involving gestational surrogates, twin preference, and third-party reproduction medical decision-making. This paper focuses on multiple-embryo transfers in the context of US surrogacy arrangements. Offering an original analysis of data obtained from the US national-assisted reproduction registry, it examines single- and multiple-embryo transfer trends over a 12-year period (2003 to 2014). Findings reveal that recommended guidelines were followed in fewer than 42% of the cases in 2014. The paper argues that ensuring equitable medical treatment for all recipients of IVF requires the adoption of treatment guidelines tailored to, and offering protections for, specific patient groups, and that, once in place, guidelines must be robustly implemented.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Assisted reproduction; Embryo transfer guidelines; Gestational surrogates; IVF clinics; In vitro fertilization; Multiple births; Soft governance

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28185120      PMCID: PMC5401701          DOI: 10.1007/s10815-017-0885-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet        ISSN: 1058-0468            Impact factor:   3.412


  59 in total

Review 1.  ACOG educational bulletin. Special problems of multiple gestation. Number 253, November 1998 (Replaces Number 131, August 1989). American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.

Authors: 
Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 3.561

2.  Health care costs resulting from IVF: prenatal and neonatal periods.

Authors:  S Koivurova; A-L Hartikainen; M Gissler; E Hemminki; R Klemetti; M-R Järvelin
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2004-09-23       Impact factor: 6.918

3.  Insurance coverage and in vitro fertilization outcomes: a U.S. perspective.

Authors:  J Ryan Martin; Jason G Bromer; Denny Sakkas; Pasquale Patrizio
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2010-08-05       Impact factor: 7.329

4.  'At least we tried everything': about binary thinking, anticipated decision regret, and the imperative character of medical technology.

Authors:  Tjeerd Tymstra
Journal:  J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 2.949

5.  Fertility treatments and multiple births in the United States.

Authors:  Aniket D Kulkarni; Denise J Jamieson; Howard W Jones; Dmitry M Kissin; Maria F Gallo; Maurizio Macaluso; Eli Y Adashi
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2013-12-05       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Recommendations for practices utilizing gestational carriers: a committee opinion.

Authors: 
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2014-12-04       Impact factor: 7.329

7.  Embryo transfer practices and multiple births resulting from assisted reproductive technology: an opportunity for prevention.

Authors:  Dmitry M Kissin; Aniket D Kulkarni; Allison Mneimneh; Lee Warner; Sheree L Boulet; Sara Crawford; Denise J Jamieson
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2015-01-27       Impact factor: 7.329

8.  Refuting a misguided campaign against the goal of single-embryo transfer and singleton birth in assisted reproduction.

Authors:  Robert J Stillman; Kevin S Richter; Howard W Jones
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2013-07-30       Impact factor: 6.918

9.  Trends in twin and triplet births: 1980-97.

Authors:  J A Martin; M M Park
Journal:  Natl Vital Stat Rep       Date:  1999-09-14

10.  Reducing the number of embryos transferred in Sweden-impact on delivery and multiple birth rates.

Authors:  P O Karlström; C Bergh
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2007-06-11       Impact factor: 6.918

View more
  1 in total

1.  Incidence of surrogacy in the USA and Israel and implications on women's health: a quantitative comparison.

Authors:  Daphna Birenbaum-Carmeli; Piero Montebruno
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2019-10-30       Impact factor: 3.412

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.