Hemalkumar B Mehta1, Abhishek D Parmar2, Deepak Adhikari3, Nina P Tamirisa4, Francesca Dimou5, Daniel Jupiter6, Taylor S Riall7. 1. Department of Surgery, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas. Electronic address: hbmehta@utmb.edu. 2. Department of Surgery, University of California, Oakland, California. 3. Department of Surgery, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas; Office of Biostatistics, Department of Preventive Medicine and Community Health, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas. 4. Department of Surgery, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas. 5. Department of Surgery, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas; Department of Surgery, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida. 6. Department of Preventive Medicine and Community Health, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas. 7. Department of Surgery, University of Arizona, College of Medicine-Tucson, Tucson, Arizona.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Surgeon and hospital volume are both known to affect outcomes for patients undergoing pancreatic resection. The objective was to evaluate the relative effects of surgeon and hospital volume on 30-d mortality and 30-d complications after pancreatic resection among older patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study used Texas Medicare data (2000-2012), identifying high-volume surgeons as those performing ≥4 pancreatic resections/year, and high-volume hospitals as those performing ≥11 pancreatic resections/year, on Medicare patients. Three-level hierarchical logistic regression models were used to evaluate the relative effects of surgeon and hospital volumes on mortality and complications, after adjusting for case mix differences. RESULTS: There were 2453 pancreatic resections performed by 490 surgeons operating in 138 hospitals. Of the total, 4.5% of surgeons and 6.5% of hospitals were high volume. The overall 30-d mortality was 9.0%, and the 30-d complication rate was 40.6%. Overall, 8.9% of the variance in 30-d mortality was attributed to surgeon factors and 9.8% to hospital factors. For 30-d complications, 4.7% of the variance was attributed to surgeon factors and 1.2% to hospital factors. After adjusting for patient, surgeon, and hospital characteristics, high surgeon volume (odds ratio [OR] = 0.54, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.33-0.87) and high hospital volume (OR = 0.52; 95% CI, 0.30-0.92) were associated with lower risk of mortality; high surgeon volume (OR = 0.71, 95% CI, 0.55-0.93) was also associated lower risk of 30-d complications. CONCLUSIONS: Both hospital and surgeon factors contributed significantly to the observed variance in mortality, but only surgeon factors impacted complications. Published by Elsevier Inc.
BACKGROUND: Surgeon and hospital volume are both known to affect outcomes for patients undergoing pancreatic resection. The objective was to evaluate the relative effects of surgeon and hospital volume on 30-d mortality and 30-d complications after pancreatic resection among older patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study used Texas Medicare data (2000-2012), identifying high-volume surgeons as those performing ≥4 pancreatic resections/year, and high-volume hospitals as those performing ≥11 pancreatic resections/year, on Medicare patients. Three-level hierarchical logistic regression models were used to evaluate the relative effects of surgeon and hospital volumes on mortality and complications, after adjusting for case mix differences. RESULTS: There were 2453 pancreatic resections performed by 490 surgeons operating in 138 hospitals. Of the total, 4.5% of surgeons and 6.5% of hospitals were high volume. The overall 30-d mortality was 9.0%, and the 30-d complication rate was 40.6%. Overall, 8.9% of the variance in 30-d mortality was attributed to surgeon factors and 9.8% to hospital factors. For 30-d complications, 4.7% of the variance was attributed to surgeon factors and 1.2% to hospital factors. After adjusting for patient, surgeon, and hospital characteristics, high surgeon volume (odds ratio [OR] = 0.54, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.33-0.87) and high hospital volume (OR = 0.52; 95% CI, 0.30-0.92) were associated with lower risk of mortality; high surgeon volume (OR = 0.71, 95% CI, 0.55-0.93) was also associated lower risk of 30-d complications. CONCLUSIONS: Both hospital and surgeon factors contributed significantly to the observed variance in mortality, but only surgeon factors impacted complications. Published by Elsevier Inc.
Authors: John D Birkmeyer; Andrea E Siewers; Emily V A Finlayson; Therese A Stukel; F Lee Lucas; Ida Batista; H Gilbert Welch; David E Wennberg Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2002-04-11 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Deborah Schrag; Craig Earle; Feng Xu; Katherine S Panageas; K Robin Yabroff; Robert E Bristow; Edward L Trimble; Joan L Warren Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2006-02-01 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: R H Janes; J E Niederhuber; J S Chmiel; D P Winchester; K C Ocwieja; J H Karnell; R E Clive; H R Menck Journal: Ann Surg Date: 1996-03 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Robert W Eppsteiner; Nicholas G Csikesz; James T McPhee; Jennifer F Tseng; Shimul A Shah Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2009-04 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Francisco Igor B Macedo; Prakash Jayanthi; Mia Mowzoon; Danny Yakoub; Vikas Dudeja; Nipun Merchant Journal: J Gastrointest Surg Date: 2017-07-25 Impact factor: 3.452
Authors: Jose F Velez-Serrano; Daniel Velez-Serrano; Valentin Hernandez-Barrera; Rodrigo Jimenez-Garcia; Ana Lopez de Andres; Pilar Carrasco Garrido; Alejandro Álvaro-Meca Journal: PLoS One Date: 2017-06-07 Impact factor: 3.240