Literature DB >> 11463014

The influence of hospital volume on survival after resection for lung cancer.

P B Bach1, L D Cramer, D Schrag, R J Downey, S E Gelfand, C B Begg.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Among patients who have undergone high-risk operations for cancer, postoperative mortality rates are often lower at hospitals where more of these procedures are performed. We undertook a population-based study to estimate the extent to which the number of procedures performed at a hospital (hospital volume) is associated with survival after resection for lung cancer.
METHODS: We studied patients 65 years old or older who received a diagnosis of stage I, II, or IIIA non-small-cell lung cancer between 1985 and 1996, resided in 1 of the 10 study areas covered by the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program, and underwent surgery at a hospital that participates in the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (2118 patients and 76 hospitals).
RESULTS: The volume of procedures at the hospital was positively associated with the survival of patients (P<0.001). Five years after surgery, 44 percent of patients who underwent operations at the hospitals with the highest volume were alive, as compared with 33 percent of those who underwent operations at the hospitals with the lowest volume. Patients at the highest-volume hospitals also had lower rates of postoperative complications (20 percent vs. 44 percent) and lower 30-day mortality (3 percent vs. 6 percent) than those at the lowest-volume hospitals.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients who undergo resection for lung cancer at hospitals that perform large numbers of such procedures are likely to survive longer than patients who have such surgery at hospitals with a low volume of lung-resection procedures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11463014     DOI: 10.1056/NEJM200107193450306

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  N Engl J Med        ISSN: 0028-4793            Impact factor:   91.245


  159 in total

1.  Thoracic surgery in a crisis.

Authors:  Martyn R Partridge
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-02-16

2.  Trends in hospital volume and operative mortality for high-risk surgery.

Authors:  Jonathan F Finks; Nicholas H Osborne; John D Birkmeyer
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2011-06-02       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Cardiothoracic surgeons do a good job.

Authors:  Alastair N J Graham
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-06-15

4.  The volume-outcome relationship in cancer surgery: a hard sell.

Authors:  Ingemar Ihse
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 5.  The lung cancer paradox: time for action.

Authors:  R C Rintoul; T Sethi
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 9.139

6.  Improving lung cancer outcomes by improving the quality of surgical care.

Authors:  Raymond U Osarogiagbon; Thomas A D'Amico
Journal:  Transl Lung Cancer Res       Date:  2015-08

Review 7.  What is quality, and can we define it in lung cancer?-the case for quality improvement.

Authors:  Farhood Farjah; Frank C Detterbeck
Journal:  Transl Lung Cancer Res       Date:  2015-08

8.  Assessing the Generalizability of the National Lung Screening Trial: Comparison of Patients with Stage 1 Disease.

Authors:  Nichole T Tanner; Lin Dai; Brett C Bade; Mulugeta Gebregziabher; Gerard A Silvestri
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 21.405

9.  Risk factors for 30-day mortality after resection of lung cancer and prediction of their magnitude.

Authors:  Trond-Eirik Strand; Hans Rostad; Ronald A M Damhuis; Jarle Norstein
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  2007-06-15       Impact factor: 9.139

10.  Volume of activity and occupancy rate in intensive care units. Association with mortality.

Authors:  Gaetano Lapichino; Luciano Gattinoni; Danilo Radrizzani; Bruno Simini; Guido Bertolini; Luca Ferla; Giovanni Mistraletti; Francesca Porta; Dinis R Miranda
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2003-12-19       Impact factor: 17.440

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.