Literature DB >> 34028698

Systematic review of prospective studies focused on regionalization of care in surgical oncology.

Shokhi Goel1,2, Matthew M Symer3, Talal Alzghari3, Becky Baltich Nelson4, Heather L Yeo3,5.   

Abstract

To perform a systematic review of studies prospectively analyzing the impact of regionalization of complex surgical oncology care on patient outcomes. High volume care of complex surgical oncology patients has been repeatedly associated with improved outcomes. Most studies, however, are retrospective and have not prospectively accounted for confounders such as financial ability and social support. Four electronic databases (Ovid MEDLINE®, Ovid EMBASE, Cochrane Library (Wiley), and EBSCHOHost) were searched from inception until August 25, 2018. Two authors independently reviewed 5887 references, with a third independent reviewer acting as arbitrator when needed. Data extracted from 11 articles that met inclusion criteria. Risk of bias assessments conducted using MINORS criteria for the non-randomized, observational studies, and the Cochrane tool for the randomized-controlled trial. Of the 11 studies selected, we found 7 historically-controlled trials, two retrospective cohort studies with prospective data collection, one prospective study, and one randomized-controlled trial. 73% of studies were from Northern Europe, 18% from Ontario, Canada, and 9% from England. Pancreatic surgery accounted for 36% of studies, followed by gynecologic oncology (27%), thoracic surgery (18%), and dermatologic surgery (9%). The studies reported varying outcome parameters, but all showed improvement post-regionalization. Included studies featured poor-to-fair risk of bias. 11 studies indicated improved outcomes following regionalization of surgical oncology, but most exhibit poor methodological rigor. Prospective evidence for the regionalization of surgical oncology is lacking. More research addressing patient access to care and specialist availability is needed to understand the shortcomings of centralization.
© 2021. Italian Society of Surgery (SIC).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Centralization; Prospective; Regionalization; Surgical oncology; Systematic review

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34028698     DOI: 10.1007/s13304-021-01073-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Updates Surg        ISSN: 2038-131X


  20 in total

1.  Pledging to Eliminate Low-Volume Surgery.

Authors:  David R Urbach
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2015-10-08       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Centralization of rectal cancer surgery improves long-term survival.

Authors:  M Hosseinali Khani; K Smedh
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 3.788

3.  Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement.

Authors:  David Moher; Alessandro Liberati; Jennifer Tetzlaff; Douglas G Altman
Journal:  Int J Surg       Date:  2010-02-18       Impact factor: 6.071

Review 4.  Tools for 'safety netting' in common paediatric illnesses: a systematic review in emergency care.

Authors:  Evelien de Vos-Kerkhof; Dorien H F Geurts; Mariska Wiggers; Henriette A Moll; Rianne Oostenbrink
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2015-07-10       Impact factor: 3.791

5.  "Take the Volume Pledge" may result in disparity in access to care.

Authors:  Barbara A Blanco; Anai N Kothari; Robert H Blackwell; Sarah A Brownlee; Ryan M Yau; John P Attisha; Yoshiki Ezure; Sam Pappas; Paul C Kuo; Gerard J Abood
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2016-11-14       Impact factor: 3.982

6.  Long-term survival is superior after resection for cancer in high-volume centers.

Authors:  Yuman Fong; Mithat Gonen; David Rubin; Mark Radzyner; Murray F Brennan
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  Relative impact of surgeon and hospital volume on operative mortality and complications following pancreatic resection in Medicare patients.

Authors:  Hemalkumar B Mehta; Abhishek D Parmar; Deepak Adhikari; Nina P Tamirisa; Francesca Dimou; Daniel Jupiter; Taylor S Riall
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2016-05-11       Impact factor: 2.192

8.  Reexamining the Relationship of Breast Cancer Hospital and Surgical Volume to Mortality: An Instrumental Variable Analysis.

Authors:  Liliana E Pezzin; Purushottam Laud; Tina W F Yen; Joan Neuner; Ann B Nattinger
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 2.983

9.  Directing surgical quality improvement initiatives: comparison of perioperative mortality and long-term survival for cancer surgery.

Authors:  Karl Y Bilimoria; David J Bentrem; Joseph M Feinglass; Andrew K Stewart; David P Winchester; Mark S Talamonti; Clifford Y Ko
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-06-23       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  Surgeon volume and operative mortality in the United States.

Authors:  John D Birkmeyer; Therese A Stukel; Andrea E Siewers; Philip P Goodney; David E Wennberg; F Lee Lucas
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2003-11-27       Impact factor: 91.245

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.