Literature DB >> 33404970

Lower recurrence rate after groin and primary ventral hernia repair performed by high-volume surgeons: a systematic review.

C Christophersen1, S Fonnes2, K Andresen2, J Rosenberg2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Hernia repair is a common procedure; however, an overview is lacking regarding the impact of annual surgeon volume and total surgical experience on the outcome of hernia repair. We aimed to explore the impact of annual surgeon volume and total surgical experience on outcomes of groin and primary ventral hernia repair.
METHODS: This systematic review followed the Prefered Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guideline. A protocol was registered at PROSPERO (CRD42020176140). PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane CENTRAL were searched. We investigated recurrence rates after groin and primary ventral hernia repair reported according to annual surgeon volume or total surgical experience with at least 6 months follow-up. Surgeons were pooled in three overlapping categories: high-volume (> 50 cases/year), medium-volume (11-50 cases/year) and low-volume (≤ 25 cases/year).
RESULTS: Ten records for groin hernia and one for primary ventral hernia were included. The median (range) recurrence rates after laparoscopic groin hernia repair for high, medium, and low-volume surgeons were 2.6% (2.3-3.0), 2.4% (0.7-4.6), and 4.2% (1.0-6.8), respectively. The median (range) recurrence rate after open groin hernia repair for high, medium, and low-volume surgeons were 2.1% (2.0-2.2), 1.7% (1.6-2.3), and 2.4% (2.2-5.0). The groin hernia recurrence rate seemed to increase when annual surgeon volume decreased below 25 cases/year. For primary ventral hernia, increased annual surgeon volume was associated with decreased reoperation rate.
CONCLUSION: High-volume surgeons seemed to have lower rates of hernia recurrence after groin as well as primary ventral hernia repair and our data supports the need for centralization of groin hernia repair on individual surgeons.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag France SAS part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Hernia; Recurrence; Reoperation; Surgeon volume; Surgical experience

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33404970     DOI: 10.1007/s10029-020-02359-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hernia        ISSN: 1248-9204            Impact factor:   2.920


  29 in total

Review 1.  Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing open and laparoscopic ventral and incisional hernia repair with mesh.

Authors:  S S Forbes; C Eskicioglu; R S McLeod; A Okrainec
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 6.939

2.  Evaluating cumulative and annual surgeon volume in laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Jonathan S Abelson; Joshua D Spiegel; Cheguevara Afaneh; Jialin Mao; Art Sedrakyan; Heather L Yeo
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2016-10-19       Impact factor: 3.982

Review 3.  A meta-analysis comparing lightweight meshes with heavyweight meshes in Lichtenstein inguinal hernia repair.

Authors:  Chunlin Zhong; Bo Wu; Zhili Yang; Xianzhao Deng; Jie Kang; Bomin Guo; Youben Fan
Journal:  Surg Innov       Date:  2012-10-16       Impact factor: 2.058

Review 4.  Patient-related risk factors for recurrence after inguinal hernia repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies.

Authors:  Jakob Burcharth; Hans-Christian Pommergaard; Thue Bisgaard; Jacob Rosenberg
Journal:  Surg Innov       Date:  2014-09-30       Impact factor: 2.058

5.  Reoperation as surrogate endpoint in hernia surgery. A three year follow-up of 1565 herniorrhaphies.

Authors:  A Kald; E Nilsson; B Anderberg; M Bragmark; P Engström; U Gunnarsson; S Haapaniemi; J Lindhagen; P Nilsson; G Sandblom; A Stubberöd
Journal:  Eur J Surg       Date:  1998-01

6.  Impact of operative time and surgeon satisfaction on the long-term outcome of hernia repair.

Authors:  G Sandblom; D Sevonius; C Staël von Holstein
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 4.739

7.  Comparison of endoscopic procedures vs Lichtenstein and other open mesh techniques for inguinal hernia repair: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  C G Schmedt; S Sauerland; R Bittner
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-12-02       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Bariatric peri-operative outcomes are affected by annual procedure-specific surgeon volume.

Authors:  Maria S Altieri; Aurora D Pryor; Jie Yang; Lizhou Nie; Mark A Talamini; Konstantinos Spaniolas
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-08-06       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Reoperation versus clinical recurrence rate after ventral hernia repair.

Authors:  Frederik Helgstrand; Jacob Rosenberg; Henrik Kehlet; Pernille Strandfelt; Thue Bisgaard
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Recurrence patterns of direct and indirect inguinal hernias in a nationwide population in Denmark.

Authors:  Jakob Burcharth; Kristoffer Andresen; Hans-Christian Pommergaard; Thue Bisgaard; Jacob Rosenberg
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2013-10-25       Impact factor: 3.982

View more
  2 in total

1.  Lower reoperation rates after open and laparoscopic groin hernia repair when performed by high-volume surgeons: a nationwide register-based study.

Authors:  C Christophersen; J J Baker; S Fonnes; K Andresen; J Rosenberg
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2021-04-09       Impact factor: 4.739

Review 2.  Robot-assisted groin hernia repair is primarily performed by specialized surgeons: a scoping review.

Authors:  Danni Lip Hansen; Anders Gram-Hanssen; Siv Fonnes; Jacob Rosenberg
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2022-07-05
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.